The supply quality of a public transport system can be characterized by a few frequently alluded factors. These factors are often not fully considered in emerging countries by decision makers, generally, the decisions are made through a top-down process, while preferences of the demand side would also be essential. This paper suggests an approach aiming to get an overview of passenger’s demands in Mersin city ‘Turkey’. As methodology, analytic hierarchy process has been applied based on created questionnaires that has been used regarding the hierarchy of quality factors, and as evaluators, the public and governmental decision makers have been involved in the survey. The degree of public satisfaction about public transport has been decided by analyzing collected data.
Safe, accountable, flexible, efficient transportation equity act: A legacy for users, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 2005.
Perez J. Some comments on Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process, Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 6, 1995, pp. 1091‒1095.
Duleba S. ; Mishina T.; Shimazaki Y. A. dynamic analysis on public bus transport’s supply quality by using AHP, Transport, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2012, pp. 268–275.
Dyer J. S. Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process, Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 3, 1990, pp. 249–258.
Abbaspour M. , Karimi E., Nassiri P., Monazzam M. R., Taghavi L. Hierarchal assessment of noise pollution in urban areas, A case study, Transportation Research, Part D, Vol. 34, 2015, pp. 95–103.
Saaty T. L. How to make decision: The analytic hierarchy process, Interfaces, Vol. 24, No. 6, 1994, pp. 19‒43.
Zahedi F. The analytic hierarchy process: A survey of the method and its applications, Interfaces, Vol. 16, No. 4, 1986, pp. 96‒108.
Alireza S. , Hossein H., Ghodrat E, Applying AHP clustering approaches for public transportation decision making: a case study of Isfahan city, Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2016, pp. 38-55.
Portschy S. Community participation in sustainable urban growth, case study of Almere, The Netherlands, Pollack Periodica, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2016. pp. 145–155.
Nassereddine M. , Eskandari H. An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation system in Tehran, Transportation Research, Part A, Polici and Practice, Vol. 106, 2017, pp. 427‒439.
Mardani A. , Zavadskas E. K., Khalifah Z., Jusoh A., Nor K. M. Application of multiplecriteria decision-making techniques and approaches to evaluating of service quality: a systematic review of the literature, Journal of Business Eeconomics and Management, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2015, pp. 1034‒1068.
Saaty T. L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1977, pp. 234–281.
Oláh J. , Nestler S., Nobel T., Popp J. Ranking of dry ports in Europe -Benchmarking, Periodica Polytechnica, Transportation Engineering, doi.org/[10.3311/PPtr.11414, 2017.
Torok A. Sustainable and efficient interurban public road transport in Hungary, Pollack Periodica, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2012, pp. 75–82.
Winkler A. Collecting public transport passenger preference data online, Pollack Periodica, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2010, pp. 119–126.