The technical and economic effects of the two methods of retrofitting with buckling restrain bracing and using concrete shear wall were investigated. The results of this study showed that using reinforcement, the amount of target displacement in the models was significantly reduced and it was observed that the concrete shear wall had a greater impact on the structure in this regard. The reinforcement methods used in this research have a significant impact on improving the technical performance of structures, which has been more in the strengthening method with concrete shear wall. Also, the evaluations showed that despite the fact that the shear wall of reinforced concrete has a better effect on the performance of the structure from a technical point of view, but in terms of weight, it can be seen that using a buckling brace can be more economical.
A. A. Maske, N. A. Maske, and P. P. Shiras, “Pushover analysis of reinforced concrete frame structures: A case study,” Int. J. Adv. Technol. Eng. Sci., vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 118–128, 2014.
V. M Deep and P. P. Raju, “Pushover analysis of RC building : comparative study on seismic zones of India,” Int. J. Civil Eng. Technol., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 567–578, 2017.
R. K. R. Rochidajah and S. D Cahyono, “Pushover analysis of BTN office building in Madiun City, Indonesia,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 3.7, pp. 634–637, 2018.
M. Ismaeil, “Seismic capacity assessment of existing RC building by using pushover analysis,” Civil Eng. J., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 2034–2043, 2018.
M. A. P. Handana and R. Karolina, “Performance evaluation of existing building structure with pushover analysis,” IOP Conf. Ser.Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 309, 2018, Paper no. 012039.
M. K. Murthy and L. K. Ashwini, “Nonlinear static pushover analysis of medium rise and high-rise building,” Int. J. Scientific Res. Sci. Technol., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 255–261, 2019.
H. K. Sultan, A. T. Mohammed, O. D. Qasim, B. H. Maula, and H. Y. Aziz, “Ductility factor evaluation of concrete moment frame retrofitted by FRP subjected to seismic loads,” Int. Rev. Civil Eng., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 275–282, 2020.
M. Ismaeil, “Seismic retrofit of steel frame structures,” Pollack Period., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 106–117, 2020.
R. G. Wibowo, R. K. Rohman, and S. D. Cahyono, “Seismic evaluation of existing building structures in the city of madiun using pushover analysis,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1845, 2021, Paper no. 012032.
SNI 1726:2012, Procedures for Planning Earthquake Resistance for Building and Non-building Structures (In Indonesian). Jakarta: National Standardization Body, 2012.
J. Nawrot, “Assessment of strengthening in a beam-to-column joint,” Pollack Period., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 92–97, 2022.
S. K. Durga and G. A. Rao, “Review study on performance of seismically tested repaired shear walls,” Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol., vol. 3, no. 16, pp. 129–135, 2014.
G. S. Kumar and P. Suji, “A comparative study on retrofitting of reinforced concrete column by concrete, steel and FRP jacketing using ETABS and ANSYS,” Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 3930–3936, 2019.
K. Chaudhary, “Effect of bracing and unbracing in steel structures by using ETABS,” Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1488–1491, 2019.