Összefoglaló. Bevezetés és célkitűzés: A női kismedencei funkciózavarok változatos tünetekkel jelentkezhetnek, és jelentősen befolyásolják az érintettek életminőségét. Vizsgálatunk célja volt felmérni a medencefenék-diszfunkciós tüneteket és azok hatását az egyén életminőségére. Módszer: Vizsgálatunkba 203 nőt vontunk be. Az adatgyűjtést két kérdőív, egy általunk összeállított és az Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire segítségével végeztük. Az adatok statisztikai elemzéséhez SPSS 20.0 rendszert használtunk. Spearman-korrelációt, khi-négyzet-próbát, Mann–Whitney-féle U-tesztet, Kruskal–Wallis-próbát és többváltozós lineáris regressziót alkalmaztunk. A szignifikanciaszintet p≤0,05 határnál állapítottuk meg. Eredmények: A hólyagdiszfunkciók gyakorisága (56,2%) szignifikáns kapcsolatot mutatott az életkor növekedésével (p<0,001), az obesitassal (p<0,001), a szülésszámmal és -móddal (p<0,001; p<0,001), az episiotomiával (p<0,001) és a prolapsusműtétekkel (p = 0,010). A süllyedéses kismedencei kórképek gyakorisága (27,1%) szignifikáns kapcsolatot mutatott az életkor növekedésével (p = 0,002), a szülésszámmal és -móddal (p<0,001; p<0,001) és a korábbi episiotomiával (p<0,001). Az analis incontinentia gyakorisága (58,9%) a magasabb testtömegindexszel (p = 0,029) volt szignifikáns kapcsolatban. Szexuális diszfunkciót (53,2%) allergia és tüdőbetegségek (p = 0,048) jelenlétével kapcsolatban találtunk. A többes diszfunkció előfordulási gyakorisága az életkor növekedésével (p<0,001), az obesitassal (p = 0,043), a korábbi hysterectomiával (p = 0,046) és prolapsusműtétekkel (p<0,001) mutatott szignifikáns kapcsolatot. Minden diszfunkció esetén kimutatható volt az életminőség-romlás (hólyagfunkciók: p<0,001; bél- és székletürítési funkciók: p<0,001, hüvelyfali süllyedés: p<0,001, szexuális funkciók: p<0,001). Következtetés: Az általunk vizsgált női populációban nagy arányban találtunk kismedencei funkciózavarokat, melyek kedvezőtlen hatással voltak az érintettek életminőségére. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(43): 1724–1731.
Summary. Introduction and objective: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) can cause several complaints in women and has an adverse effect on the quality of life (Qol). The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction and its effect on Qol. Method: 203 women were included. We used two questionnaires, a self-constructed and the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 20.0. Spearman’s correlation, chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis tests and multivariate linear regression were used. Statistical significance was set at p≤0.05. Results: There was a significant association between the prevalence of urinary incontinence (56.2%) and age (p<0.001), obesity (p<0.001), number and mode of deliveries (p<0.001; p<0.001), episiotomy (p<0.001) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery (p = 0.010); between the occurrence of POP (27.1%) and age (p = 0.002), the number and mode of deliveries (p<0.001; p<0.001) and episiotomy (p<0.001); between the prevalence of anal incontinence (58.9%) and obesity (p = 0.029); between sexual dysfunction (SD) (53.2%) and respiratory disease and allergy (p = 0.048). Multiple PFD was significantly associated with age (p<0.001), obesity (p = 0.043), hysterectomy (p = 0.046) and POP surgery (p = 0.010). There was a significant difference between women having more severe PFD than milder complaints regarding Qol (bladder p<0.001; bowel p<0.001; SD p<0.001 and POP p<0.001). Conclusion: Pelvic floor dysfunction was common in our study population and had a great adverse effect on Qol. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(43): 1724–1731.
Markland AD, Richter HE, Fwu CW, et al. Prevalence and trends of urinary incontinence in adults in the United States, 2001 to 2008. J Urol. 2011; 186: 589–593.
Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, et al. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG 2005; 112: 971–976.
Wood LN, Anger JT. Urinary incontinence in women. BMJ 2014; 349: g4531.
Vergeldt TF, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, et al. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 26: 1559–1573.
Braekken IH, Majida M, Ellström Engh M, et al. Pelvic floor function is independently associated with pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 2009; 116: 1706–1714.
Leanza V, Passanisi A, Leanza G. Urinary incontinence: quality of life and psychological aspects. Urogynaecologia 2013; 27: e3.
Larsson C, Hedberg CL, Lundgren E, et al. Anal incontinence after caesarean and vaginal delivery in Sweden: a national population-based study. Lancet 2019; 393: 1233–1239.
Saraçoğlu M, Eroğlu A, Divrik RT. Prevalence of anal incontinence and constipation in female patients with urinary incontinence. J Urol Surg. 2018; 5: No. 1.
Li-Yun-Fong R, Larouche M, Hyakutake M, et al. Is pelvic floor dysfunction an independent threat to sexual function? A cross-sectional study in women with pelvic floor dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2017; 14: 226–237.
Dietz HP, Stankiewicz M, Ata IK, et al. Vaginal laxity: what does this symptom mean? Int Urogynecol J. 2018; 29: 723–728.
Banyó T. Diagnosis and treatment of urinary dysfunctions. [A vizelési zavarok kórismézése és kezelése.] Nőgyógy Onk. 2008; 13: 63–67. [Hungarian]
Lipcsey A, Matányi S, Szüle E, et al. Statistics of urinary incontinence of women in Hungary. [A női vizeletinkontinencia országos statisztikai vizsgálata.] Orv Hetil. 2004; 145: 2237–2240. [Hungarian]
Kovács Á, Vártokné Hevér N, Tóth A, et al. Epidemiology of female urinary incontinence in Hungary; a questionnaire survey, 2011. [A női vizeletinkontinencia epidemiológiája Magyarországon; kérdőíves vizsgálat, 2011.] Magy Urol. 2012; 24: 159–166. [Hungarian]
Matányi S. Urinary disorders in pregnancy and post-partum. [A vizelettartás és ürítés zavarai a terhesség alatt és szülés után.] Orv Hetil. 1992; 133: 2551–2553. [Hungarian]
Baessler K, Schüssler B, Burgio K, at al. (eds.) Pelvic floor re-education: principles and practice. Springer-Verlag, London, 2008.
Baessler K, O’Neill SM, Maher CF, et al. A validated self-administered female pelvic floor questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2010; 21: 163–172.
Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000; 894: i–xii, 1–253.
Freyd M. The graphic rating scale. J Educ Psychol. 1923; 14: 83–102.
Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 141–148.
Swenson CW, Kolenic GE, Trowbridge ER, et al. Obesity and stress urinary incontinence in women: compromised continence mechanism or excess bladder pressure during cough? Int Urogynecol J. 2017; 28: 1377–1385.
Giri A, Hartmann KE, Hellwege JN, et al. Obesity and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 217: 11–26.e3.
Whitcomb EL, Lukacz ES, Lawrence JM, et al. Prevalence and degree of bother from pelvic floor disorders in obese women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009; 20: 289–294.
Farkas B, Gál P, Rácz S, et al. Should we consider obesity a risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse? Pelviperineology 2017; 36: 104–107.
Durnea CM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, et al. The role of prepregnancy pelvic floor dysfunction in postnatal pelvic morbidity in primiparous women. Int Urogynecol J. 2014; 25: 1363–1374.
Brochard C, Vénara A, Bodère A, et al. Pathophysiology of fecal incontinence in obese patents: a prospective case-matched study of 201 patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017; 29: e13051.
Bharucha AE, Pemberton JH, Locke GR 3rd. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on constipation. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 218–238.
Lian WQ, Li FJ, Huang HX, et al. Constipation and risk of urinary incontinence in women: a meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2019; 30: 1629–1634.
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 198: Prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 132: e87–e102.
Frigerio M, Mastrolia SA, Spelzini F, et al. Long-term effects of episiotomy on urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019; 299: 317–325. [Published: 18 December 2018]
Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG 2013; 120: 152–160.
Horst W, do Valle JB, Silva JC, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a Brazilian population. Int Urogynecol J. 2017; 28: 1165–1170.
Lalji S, Lozanova P. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a monopolar nonablative radiofrequency device for the improvement of vulvo-vaginal laxity and urinary incontinence. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017; 16: 230–234.
Chambers R, Lucht A, Reihill A, et al. Prevalence and impact of pelvic floor dysfunction in an adult cystic fibrosis population: a questionnaire survey. Int Urogynecol J. 2017; 28: 591–604.
Lethaby A, Mukhopadhyay A, Naik R. Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 4: CD004993
Bohlin KS, Ankardal M, Lindkvist H, et al. Factors influencing the incidence and remission of urinary incontinence after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 216: 53.e1–53.e9.
Løwenstein E, Møller LA, Laigaard J, et al. Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse: a Danish cohort study with 15–20 years’ follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2018; 29: 119–124.
Practice Bulletin No. 176: Pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: e56–e72.
Zeleke BM, Bell RJ, Billah B, et al. Symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in community-dwelling older Australian women. Maturitas 2016; 85: 34–41.
Saarni SI, Härkänen T, Sintonen H, et al. The impact of 29 chronic conditions on health-related quality of life: a general population survey in Finland using 15D and EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2006; 15: 1403–1414.
Lopes MH, Costa JN, Bicalho MB, et al. Profile and quality of life of women in pelvic floor rehabilitation. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018; 71: 2496–505.
Laganà AS, La Rosa VL, Rapisarda AM, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse: the impact on quality of life and psychological well-being. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 39: 164–166.
Meyer I, Richter HE. Impact of fecal incontinence and its treatment on quality of life in women. Womens Health (Lond). 2015; 11: 225–238.
Bilgic D, Gokyildiz S, Kizilkaya Beji N, et al. Quality of life and sexual functıon in obese women with pelvic floor dysfunction. Women Health 2019; 59: 101–113.
Belsey J, Greenfield S, Candy D, et al. Systematic review: impact of constipation on quality of life in adults and children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010; 31: 938–949.
Demir G, Erbesler ZA. Quality of life and factors associated with it in elderly women with urinary incontinence. Turkish Geriatr Der. 2017; 20: 213–222.
Mattsson NK, Karjalainen PK, Tolppanen AM, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and quality of life – a nationwide cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222: 588.e1–588.e10.
Shaw C, Wagg A. Urinary incontinence in older adults. Medicine 2017; 45: 23–27.
Forootan M, Bagheri N, Darvishi M. Chronic constipation: a review of literature. Medicine 2018; 97: e10631.