Search Results
many of the texts of Hungarian literary criticism in Slovakia. The possible levels of transculturalism in the Slovakian Hungarian reception of these writings are the following: Transculturalism as
'analphabète [ The Illiterate ] ( 2004 ). What literary criticism considers her most important literary achievement is her novel Le Grand Cahier [ The Great Notebook ] ( 1986 ), along with its sequels: La Preuve [ The Proof ] ( 1988 ) and Le Troisième mensonge
socialist realism be evident in their work. Socialist realism, the framework of which was developed by Soviet cultural politician Zhdanov, 21 became the dominant method of literary criticism in Hungary in the 1950s
2018 Symposium Classicum Peregrinum: “Blessings and Curses in Antiquity”
June 21–24, 2018 Lonato del Garda, Italy
details which might allude to one other, with the aim of underlining the importance of human and divine kourotrophia, by using the concept of intertext in literary criticism. Michaela Kellová: ‘Who is his Mother so I
): The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Volume II. The Middle Ages . Cambridge 2005, 107. 6 Edwards, R.: The Heritage of Fulgentius. In Bernardo, A. S. – Levin, S. (eds): The Classics in the Middle Ages . Binghamton – New York 1990, 141. 7 See
at least as important as the author's or readers' different interests and expectations. Although contemporary literary criticism mostly faces the legitimate need to strictly separate the aesthetic/poetic identity of the work of art from the gratuitous
generally eludes a large audience. Prizes also have the ability to make something generally elusive tangible, or at least to appear to be so, to a broad lay audience. In this context, prizes take on the same key functions as, for example, literary criticism
On the concept of πλάσμα, see Meijering, R.: Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia . Groningen 1987, 84–87; Nünlist, R.: The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia . Cambridge 2009, 260
. There is a comparatively large spread in the authors’ choice of topics ranging from anthroponomy to orthographic issues, from phraseology to literary criticism, from translatology to methodical remarks concerning uni- versity language teaching and from
Duffy–Sheridan–Westerink–White (1969) . 29 Robert Lamberton osserva che “the elucidation of the ‘symbols’ seems to belong to the field of comparative religion rather than that of literary criticism” ( Lamberton [1986] 127–128). 30 Edwards (1996
