Search Results
Abstract
We propose a simple way to put in a common scale the h values of researchers working in different scientific ISI fields, so that the foreseeable misuse of this index for inter-areas comparison might be prevented, or at least, alleviated.
Abstract
This paper compares the h-indices of a list of highly-cited Israeli researchers based on citations counts retrieved from the Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar respectively. In several case the results obtained through Google Scholar are considerably different from the results based on the Web of Science and Scopus. Data cleansing is discussed extensively.
Abstract
In the last few years, many new bibliometric rankings or indices have been proposed for comparing the output of scientific researchers. We propose a formal framework in which rankings can be axiomatically characterized. We then present a characterization of some popular rankings. We argue that such analyses can help the user of a ranking to choose one that is adequate in the context where she/he is working.
easy to derive from citation indexes, such as the World of Science (WoS). However, as a researcher publishes more papers and those papers accumulate more citations, the h -index increases steeply with time going from, typically, a value of 5–10 to 30
Bencze Gy.: H-index: Egy új javaslat az egyéni tudományos teljesítmény értékelésére. Magy. Tud., 2006, 166 , 88–91. Bencze Gy. H-index: Egy új javaslat az egyéni tudományos
. Techniques of network analysis, centrality and other network-based indicators became part of the standard toolkit of scientometrics, mentioning Abassi et al. ( 2010 ) or Guns et al. ( 2011 ) just as examples from the recent literature. The h -index
take into account the number of authors and their individual contribution in the paper. Another measure of the quality of research is h -index (Hirsch 2005 ). Axiomatic characterizations of h -index is carried out in Woeginger ( 2008
bibliometric characteristics [Hirsch-index (h-index)], mean citations per publication, total number of publications, total citation count, and year of first publication) of the research output of anaesthetists in higher specialist training in Ireland. The
