Search Results
Based on the presence or absence of the various groups (early Roman pottery, glazed, smoothed-in, new, 5th century pottery), I tried to distinguish pottery groups within the fort’s material. 13 This also meant chronological differences. Sometimes the
Mortaria were used in Pannonia in the entire Roman period, but they changed in form and material from time to time. Potter’s stamps indicate that some of them were imported goods, but they were mostly local products. The article deals with mortaria found in Zalalövő (ancient Salla) between 1973 and 2005 and tries to draw a picture of the chronology and the provenance of the different mortarium types.
Numerous notable potters’ waste layers came to light during the recent excavation of a detail of the military pottery workshop (so-called’ Kiscelli Street workshop’) in the Aquincum canabae.A distinctive quality ceramic group was separatable in these layers. These ceramics have well, fine levigated clay and were fired to red and hard. The surfaces are glossy by burnishing or a very thin slip. These sherds measure in many cases up to the Samian ware quality. As geochemical researches revealed these ceramics were made from local clay into which some „red earth” (rich in Al2O3-, Fe2O3- and MnO) admixture was mixed. Moreover it was also observed that the above-mentioned good quality product forms were sometimes made in a „traditional” (without red admixture) colour, too.We can find the best analogies of these ceramics in connection with the finds of the legionary pottery’s find-places (Noviomagus-Holdeurn ware, Vetera, Vindonissa, Argentorate, Wetterau ware, Butovo etc.). These are in the closest connection with the Holdeurn ware in both form and quality (four of the five forms are almost identical). Based on the similarity we think that potterers from Noviomagus might have been commanded here, which is naturally not surprising knowing that the legio X Gemina was placed from Noviomagus to Aquincum in 105 AD and was stationed here till 118 AD. At the same time, researching the origin of the existing forms we find many similarities with the eastern Samian ware (terra sigillata) forms, too. This raises the question who were those potterers that developed these forms first? Though J. K. Haalebos suggested the presence of Italian potterers in connection with the Holdeun pottery, the possibility of eastern potterers’ contribution can also be taken into account.
A római kerámia füstölők funkciójának kérdése régóta vitatott. A zalalövői füstölőtál-anyag feldolgozása során nyert információk, valamint az ókori források alapján megcáfolható, hogy a füstölőket olajlámpaként, libációs edényként, gyümölcsöstálnak vagy virágcserépnek használták volna. A turibulu-mok a római háztartás alapfelszereléséhez tartoztak (Liv. XXIX,14,13), és az égésnyomok alapján a házi isteneknek rendszeresen bemutatott füstáldozatra szolgáltak. Nevük a leggyakrabban füstölt anyagból, a tömjénből ered, amelynek égetése a kultikus célokon túl praktikus előnyökkel is járt. A kereszténység terjedésével párhuzamosan a füstölőtálak eltűntek a római életből, mivel a keresztények a füstölés szokását pogány cselekedetnek tartották, és teljes mértékben elutasították.
keramika Ulpijane (The roman pottery of Ulpiana). Beográd. Rimská keramika Ulpijane (The roman pottery of Ulpiana) Bánki, Zs. 1982
Rayes, J. W. 1972 Late Román Pottery. London. Late Román Pottery Rayes, J. W. 1980 Supplement to Late Román Pottery. London
T. Szönyi E. 1981 Korarómai fazekaskemencék Mursellában (Early román pottery Kilns in Mursella), In: Iparrégészeti kutatások Magyarországon (Industrial Archaeology. Kilns and furnaces), Szerk. Gömöri, J. Veszprém, 19
-germanischen Keramik 10. Bonn 1990, 86. 7 Schindler–Scheffenegger 1977, 147. 8 Schindler-Kaudelka Et Al . 2001, 177. 9 Ibidem , Taf. 72, Sb 27. 10 Schindler–Scheffenegger 1977, Taf. 58.4, 6, 10. 11 J. W. Hayes: Roman pottery from the South Stoa at Corinth. Hesperia 43
Barbaricum. Festschrift für Titus Kolník zum 70. Geburtstag . Nitra , 313 – 324 . K uzmová , K lára 2014 Roman Pottery in Barbaricum: the case of terra
. British archaeological reports, International series, 621. Oxford, pp. 64–65; Miletić Čakširan, I. (2019). Typological and chronological classification of Roman pottery from Siscia . PhD thesis. University of Zagreb, pp. 111–112. 89. Solymár Kocztur, É
