Search Results
flowering of formal phonological theory, which both provoked the rehabilitation of syllable structure in mainstream phonological theory, and led to the introduction of novel hierarchical organisation in autosegmental representations both below and above the
Flemming, Edward 2002. Auditory representations in phonology. Routledge, New York. Flemming E. Auditory representations in phonology
Richardson, Daniel C. — Michael J. Spivey — Lawrence W. Barsalou — Ken McRae 2003. Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of words. In: Cognitive Science 27: 767–780. McRae K
output representations and the unity of opacity. In M. Hirotani , A. Coetzee , N. Hall and J.-Y. Kim (eds.) Proceedings of NELS 30 . Amherst : University of Massachusetts . 231 – 245 . Goldsmith , John . 1976 . Autosegmental
Consonant lenition inside and outside the “minimal foot”
A Strict CV Phonology analysis
phonological representations, part II . Dordrecht, Cinnaminson : Foris . 337 – 383 . Steriade , Donca . 2000 . Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary . In M
Irodalom G ruia , A na-maria 2013 Religious Representations on Stove Tiles from the Medieval Kingdom of Hungary . Cluj
. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions . In G. Trousdale and T. Hoffmann (eds.) The Oxford handbook of construction grammar . Oxford : Oxford University Press . 49 – 69
Conferences, 8 (2014). 1797 – 1812 Lazaridou, Angeliki , Marco Marelli , Roberto Zamparelli and Marco Baroni . 2013 . Compositionally derived representations of
perspectives on phases. MIT Working Papers i . Linguistics 49 . 201 – 236 . Vainikka , Anne . 1989 . Deriving syntactic representations in Finnish . Doctoral dissertation
The article illustrates some of the salient features of Government Phonology (GP) 2.0 by axiomatising (a subclass of) the set of possible Putonghua forms.We show that a phonological theory can profit by assuming that phonological representations are hierarchical, just like syntactic representations. A structural relation of c++command, a relative of the well-known c-command, is used heavily. The similarity with syntax is further underlined by the introduction of a phonological Binding Theory: illicit representations are prohibited by the LUxI Principles, the phonological counterpart of Principles A, B and C.
