Search Results
situations there are other, more useful methods, e.g. total number of publications, complete citations or the Hirsch Index (Hirsch 2005 ). Detailed analysis confirms that in history, for frequently-cited authors, all measured indicators are closely
Selected characteristics of the authors in the sample: number of papers, number of cited papers, number of citations, average number of citations (per cited paper), Hirsch index, Pareto index, and Shleifer number
It is well known (Hirsch 2005 ; Anderson et al. 2008 ; Kosmulski 2009 ; Abt 2011 ) that the Hirsch index h of an author increases with his/her publication duration t . Therefore, the h index cannot be used to compare the scientific
. AFJ Van Raan 2006 Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups . Scientometrics 67 3 491 – 502
matter physics in the Netherlands . Research Policy 27 1 95 – 107 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00026-2 . AFJ Van Raan 2006 Comparison of the Hirsch-index with
decomposition analysis North-Holland Amsterdam . AFJ van Raan 2006 Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators
Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index . Europhysics Letters 78 3 0002 10.1209/0295-5075/78/30002 . 16. Seglen , P. O. 1992 The skewness of science
