Authors:Ling-Li Li, Guohua Ding, Nan Feng, Ming-Huang Wang, and Yuh-Shan Ho
In this study, we aim to evaluate the global scientific production of stem cell research for the past 16 years and provide
insights into the characteristics of the stem cell research activities and identify patterns, tendencies, or regularities
that may exist in the papers. Data are based on the online version of SCI, Web of Science from 1991 to 2006. Articles referring
to stem cell were assessed by many aspects including exponential fitting the trend of publication outputs during 1991–2006,
distribution of source title, author keyword, and keyword plus analysis. Based on the exponential fitting the yearly publicans
of the last decade, it can also be calculated that, in 2,011, the number of scientific papers on the topic of stem-cell will
be twice of the number of publications in 2006. Synthetically analyzing three kinds of keywords, it can be concluded that
application of stem cell transplantation technology to human disease therapy, especially research related on “embryonic stem
cell” and “mesenchymal stem cell” is the orientation of all the stem cell research in the 21st century. This new bibliometric method can help relevant researchers realize the panorama of global stem cell research, and
establish the further research direction.
The primary aim of this paper is to assess the contribution to the international literature of Spanish scientific production
in the research stream of innovation and technology management. For this purpose 72 articles published in the last decade
in the most prestigious international journals in this research stream have been evaluated. From this analysis we have concluded
that there has been a positive evolution from 1995 to the present time, as much from a qualitative as from a quantitative
point of view. Likewise, we have found that research in this research stream is concentrated fundamentally on a reduced group
of universities. Nevertheless, these do not focus exclusively on one or a few research subjects, but on a wide range thereof.
This paper considers the status of information science as science through an exploration ofone of the leading journals in the field – the Journal of the American Society for InformationScience (JASIS) from its initial publication as American Documentation (AD) in 1950 through theclosing issue of its Silver Anniversary year in December 1999. It is a bibliometric examination ofAD/JASIS articles. Based on our analysis of articles published in AD and JASIS from 1950 to1999, we find that there has been a slow but perhaps inevitable shift based first on the single nonfundedresearcher and author to a much wider research and publishing participation amongauthors, regions, corporate authors, and countries. This suggests not only cross-fertilization ofideas, but also more complex research questions. A small trend toward greater external fundingfurther reinforces this hypothesis. Information may no longer be "little" science, but it is also not"big" science.
We propose a comprehensive bibliometric study of the profile of Nobel Prize winners in chemistry and physics from 1901 to
2007, based on citation data available over the same period. The data allows us to observe the evolution of the profiles of
winners in the years leading up to—and following—nominations and awarding of the Nobel Prize. The degree centrality and citation
rankings in these fields confirm that the Prize is awarded at the peak of the winners’ citation history, despite a brief Halo
Effect observable in the years following the attribution of the Prize. Changes in the size and organization of the two fields
result in a rapid decline of predictive power of bibliometric data over the century. This can be explained not only by the
growing size and fragmentation of the two disciplines, but also, at least in the case of physics, by an implicit hierarchy
in the most legitimate topics within the discipline, as well as among the scientists selected for the Nobel Prize. Furthermore,
the lack of readily-identifiable dominant contemporary physicists suggests that there are few new paradigm shifts within the
field, as perceived by the scientific community as a whole.
Authors:Hsuan-I Liu, Bi-Chun Chang, and Kuan-Chia Chen
This paper employs bibliometric methods to observe collaboration patterns of scientific publications in biotechnology, information and computer technology, future energy, and nanotechnology among different institutions in Taiwan. The results show primary domestic and international collaborative patterns, the effect of collaborative papers on the world-wide average, collaborative networks, and the distribution of institutions on global map. The findings suggest that domestic collaboration in each area is higher in proportion than international collaboration. Biotechnology leads in both domestic and international collaborative percentage. Among cooperative benchmarking countries, the US and China are the main partners. Collaboration among research institutes and universities is the most frequent collaborative pattern in each area except biotechnology, which tends to occur between hospitals and universities. On average, international collaborative papers tend to have greater effect, except in nanotechnology. Academia Sinica collaborated frequently with foreign institutes in each research field. A further analysis on how each collaborative group forms is recommended, especially collaboration among the Triple-Helix relationships.
Authors:Anthony F. J. van Raan, Thed N. van Leeuwen, and Martijn S. Visser
We applied a set of standard bibliometric indicators to monitor the scientific state-of-arte of 500 universities worldwide and constructed a ranking on the basis of these indicators (Leiden Ranking ). We find a dramatic and hitherto largely underestimated language effect in the bibliometric, citation-based measurements of research performance when comparing the ranking based on all Web of Science (WoS) covered publications and on only English WoS covered publications, particularly for Germany and France.
Authors:Mark Elkins, Christopher Maher, Robert Herbert, Anne Moseley, and Catherine Sherrington
To determine the degree of correlation among journal citation indices that reflect the average number of citations per article,
the most recent journal ratings were downloaded from the websites publishing four journal citation indices: the Institute
of Scientific Information’s journal impact factor index, Eigenfactor’s article influence index, SCImago’s journal rank index and Scopus’ trend line index. Correlations were determined for each pair of indices, using ratings from all journals that could be identified as
having been rated on both indices. Correlations between the six possible pairings of the four indices were tested with Spearman’s
rho. Within each of the six possible pairings, the prevalence of identifiable errors was examined in a random selection of
10 journals and among the 10 most discordantly ranked journals on the two indices. The number of journals that could be matched
within each pair of indices ranged from 1,857 to 6,508. Paired ratings for all journals showed strong to very strong correlations,
with Spearman’s rho values ranging from 0.61 to 0.89, all p < 0.001. Identifiable errors were more common among scores for journals that had very discordant ranks on a pair of indices.
These four journal citation indices were significantly correlated, providing evidence of convergent validity (i.e. they reflect
the same underlying construct of average citability per article in a journal). Discordance in the ranking of a journal on
two indices was in some cases due to an error in one index.
The study seeks to identify the influence of local and regional publications in the production of public health research papers
in the Latin American region. A citation analysis of the papers published in the following three leading journals in the field
of public health was conducted: Revista Médica de Chile (Chile) (RMCh); Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición (Venezuela) (ALAN); and Salud Pública de México (México) (SPM). Papers were analyzed for the period 2003–2007. SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online) and the printed
version of the journals were used in the analysis. Overall, 1,273 papers from 122 journal issues were analyzed. References
accounted for a total of 38,459. Over 90% of the production was published through the collaboration of two or more authors.
Author affiliation corresponded in most cases to the country of origin of the journal. References to Portuguese papers accounted
for nearly 5% in ALAN and less than 1% each in SPM and RMCh. Citations among the three journals were not significant. Only
ALAN cited RMCh and SPM over 3% each, of total citations. SPM and RMCh cited each other less than 1% of total citations. With
the exception of ALAN, most public health papers published in RMCh and SPM derived from the national collaboration of researchers
in the field. A small amount of public health knowledge communication was being transferred from Brazil to the region through
RMCh and SPM. A vertical and individual (per journal/country) model of knowledge communication in public health was identified.
Authors:Xingjian Liu, F. Benjamin Zhan, Song Hong, Beibei Niu, and Yaolin Liu
). In this article, we evaluate earthquake research performance based on a bibliometricanalysis of 84,051 documents published in journals and other outlets contained in the Scientific Citation Index (SCI) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI
Authors:Giovanni Abramo, Tindaro Cicero, and Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo
. Through a bibliometricanalysis conducted on all Italian universities active in the hard sciences for the 5 years from 2004 to 2008, we will analyze the distribution of performance within universities in two scenarios: under the observed scenario with