In this paper we compare the scientific research in the semiconductor-related field in China with some other major nations
in Asia. It is based on the bibliometric information from SCI-Expanded database during the time period of 1995–2004. We show
that China has been developing fast in semiconductor research, and become the second productive country in Asia as reflected
by the publication profile. The evidences indicate a significant increasing trend in the research efforts and readership among
Asian countries. Similar to the scientists in Japan and South Korea, Chinese scientists were more inclined to work in larger
groups, typically 4 or more authors. The assessment of research quality is further conducted based on citation-based measures.
As benchmarks, two western countries, namely USA and Germany, have been compared in the citation analysis. It is revealed
that the impacts of research outputs in the Asian countries, except for Japan, have been badly incommensurate with their devoted
research efforts compared with USA and Germany. Like most of other Asian countries the research results of Chinese scientists
in semiconductor have a low international visibility despite their strong research efforts and increasingly large domestic
readership. The application of Leimkuhler curve illustrates vividly the inequality of citation times among the compared countries.
Furthermore, the Gini Indices of each country and each pair of countries are calculated which illustrates again the inequality
of informetric productivities.
An analysis of 4650 publications abstracted inJournal of Current Laser Abstracts Vol. 27 (April 1990-March 1991) indicates that 14 countries contributed about 94% of the research output with USA toping
the list followed by Japan and the erstwhile USSR. Technical reports and patents, besides articles in scientific journals
constitute an important source of information on laser science and technology. “Spectroscopy of laser output” is the sub-speciality
which has received maximum emphasis. USA has paid almost equal emphasis for theoretical, experimental and applications of
laser research, while such pattern is not applicable for other countries. For USSR, China, and India, the impact of research
did not commensurate with the publication effort.
Authors:Gohar Feroz Khan, Junghoon Moon, Han Woo Park, Bobby Swar, and Jae Jeung Rho
hand, the number of publications dedicated to electronic government issues in developing countries has increased in recent years. Researchers have analyzed the growing amount of electronic government literature while pursuing different objectives. Many
Authors:S. Sangam, Liang Liming, and Gireesh Ganjihal
The present paper describes the application of growth models as suggested by Egghe and Ravichadra Rao (Scientometrics 25:5–46,
1992). The scope of the paper is limited to study the growth and dynamics of Indian and Chinese publications in the field
of liquid crystals research (1997–2006).
Using statistical method, the author analyzed the citation rate of articles published in Chinese Science Bulletin (CSB) between 1995 and 1999 in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) databases. Results indicated that: 1. Majority of authors who published in CSB were Chinese; 2. The articles were
basically cited by the authors themselves in the first year after publication; 3. The peak of total citation rate appeared
in the third year after publication and the peak of non-self-citation rate was further delayed. There are relatively high
self-citation rates of articles from CSB and most of these citations are from Chinese scientific journals. This indicates
that our citation environment is limited to a closed circle. The author, therefore, proposed a strategy for changing the current
conditions of Chinese scientific journals to raise their influence.
The most popular method for judging the impact of biomedical articles is citation count which is the number of citations received.
The most significant limitation of citation count is that it cannot evaluate articles at the time of publication since citations
accumulate over time. This work presents computer models that accurately predict citation counts of biomedical publications
within a deep horizon of 10 years using only predictive information available at publication time. Our experiments show that
it is indeed feasible to accurately predict future citation counts with a mixture of content-based and bibliometric features
using machine learning methods. The models pave the way for practical prediction of the long-term impact of publication, and
their statistical analysis provides greater insight into citation behavior.
universities (Shin, in press).
However, the previous literature published in international journals does not adequately address the social forces shaping U-I-G relations development and innovation diffusion in Asia. In order to investigate the TH or U
media technologies (Baez et al. 2010 ) may reduce the onus of using the scientific literature. Indeed, in other knowledge-intensive work such as software development, enhanced search capability leads to greater component reuse (Banker et al. 1993
Authors:Robert K. Abercrombie, Akaninyene W. Udoeyop, and Bob G. Schlicher
conference literature), the subsequent critical discoveries (evident via original scientific, conference literature and patents), and the transitioning through the various TRLs ultimately to commercial application.