. N. M. Petry F. S. Stinson B. F. Grant 2005 Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other
Problematic overstudying: Studyholism or study addiction?
Commentary on: Ten myths about work addiction (Griffiths et al., 2018)
.e., obsessive) and/or externalizing (i.e., addiction) nature of problematic overstudying. More specifically, we refer to the fifth edition of Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013 ) diagnostic criteria
development ( Cade & Gates, 2017 ). However, the powerful motivational pull of gaming might cause some vulnerable individuals to lose control over their gaming behavior. Although the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5
. P. Kafka 2010 Hypersexual Disorder: A proposed diagnosis for DSM-V Archives of Sexual Behavior 39 2 377 400
3 89 123 . C. Holden 2010 Behavioral addictions debut in proposed DSM-V Science
of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV; APA, 2000 ) criteria and comprehensive information from a clinical examination, which included interviews with both youth and parent and review of psychiatric, psychometric, and
Under the umbrella
Commentary on: Chaos and confusion in DSM-5 diagnosis of Internet Gaming Disorder: Issues, concerns, and recommendations for clarity in the field (Kuss et al.)
psychotherapy, the inclusion of Internet Gaming Disorder as a preliminary clinical condition in Section III of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5; APA, 2013 ) has to be considered not only as a justified but
From Pong to Pokemon Go, catching the essence of the Internet Gaming Disorder diagnosis
Commentary on: Chaos and confusion in DSM-5 diagnosis of Internet Gaming Disorder: Issues, concerns, and recommendations for clarity in the field (Kuss et al.)
The paper by Kuss, Griffiths, and Pontes ( 2016 ) titled “Chaos and confusion in DSM-5 diagnosis of Internet Gaming Disorder: Issues, concerns, and recommendations for clarity in the field” provides a critical account on a subject that the
, 2016 ). In the field of gaming research, such criteria have not yet been established in a similar manner. In fact, the definition of gaming disorder based on the nine criteria defined in the appendix of the DSM-5 ( American Psychiatric Association [APA
Stepping back to advance: Why IGD needs an intensified debate instead of a consensus
Commentary on: Chaos and confusion in DSM-5 diagnosis of Internet Gaming Disorder: Issues, concerns, and recommendations for clarity in the field (Kuss et al.)
In their insightful and important paper, Kuss, Griffiths, and Pontes ( 2017 ) describe the current situation of the DSM-5 diagnosis of Internet gaming disorder (IGD) as “chaos and confusion.” The authors identify several problems, focusing on
