This study examined research performance of Korean physicists, comparing Korean-authoredpapers versus internationally co-authored papers, indexed in SCI, 1994-1998, and using thenumber of citations received by internationally co-authored papers covered by the SCI CD-ROM.For the study, 4,665 papers published from the researchers affiliated with the physics departmentsor physics-associated laboratories at Korean universities and indexed by SCI were analyzed.Korean authored papers tended to be published in Korean, Japanese, and UK journals, whileinternationally co-authored papers were more likely to appear in German, Dutch, and Swissjournals. Among the 18 authorship countries (on the basis of first author), 93 internationally co-authored papers by U.S. researchers had the highest citation rate, an average 15.9 citations perpaper. Of the eight countries that published over 5 papers, there was no correlation between theaverage number of citations per paper and the total number of citations. However, an ANOVAindicated a significant difference between the average number of citations per paper according tocountry (F = 5.84, p < 0.0005). In other words, papers by the U.S. and French researchers tendedto be cited more frequently than papers by the Italian, Japanese, Korean, Russian, and Germanresearchers.
By comparing the citation patterns of Korean researchers in physics and mechanical engineering, this study identifies the
extent to which type of publication source (Korean non-SCI, Korean SCI, and international SCI) and type of authorship (purely
Korean authors, Korean-foreign co-authors, and foreign-Korean co-authors) influence the choice of sources cited by Korean
scientists. Koreans publishing physics or mechanical engineering papers in international SCI journals are more likely to cite
articles published in journals of the science mainstream countries (the U.S., the U.K., the Netherlands, and Germany) than
articles published in national journals, while Koreans publishing in Korean journals tend to cite articles published in national
journals. In terms of authorship, articles published in mainstream journals are more highly cited by internationally co-authored
papers than Korean-authored papers in both disciplines.
Authors:Ronald Kostoff, Ryan Barth, and Clifford Lau
This study evaluates trends in quality of nanotechnology and nanoscience papers produced by South Korean authors. The metric
used to gauge quality is ratio of highly cited nanotechnology papers to total nanotechnology papers produced in sequential
time frames. In the first part of this paper, citations (and publications) for nanotechnology documents published by major
producing nations and major producing global institutions in four uneven time frames are examined. All nanotechnology documents
in the Science Citation Index [SCI, 2006] for 1998, 1999–2000, 2001–2002, 2003 were retrieved and analyzed in March 2007.
In the second part of this paper, all the nanotechnology documents produced by South Korean institutions were retrieved and
examined. All nanotechnology documents produced in South Korea (each document had at least one author with a South Korea address)
in each of the above time frames were retrieved and analyzed. The South Korean institutions were extracted, and their fraction
of total highly cited documents was compared to their fraction of total published documents. Non-Korean institutions that
co-authored papers were included as well, to offer some perspective on the value of collaboration.
Interdisciplinary research has been encouraged through the policies of many governmental and institutional funding agencies
in Korea. This paper measured the degrees of interdisciplinarity in individual and collaborative researches and analyzes the
factors affecting it. This paper also examined flow of knowledge among different disciplines in science and engineering research
using a database obtained from research proposals submitted to Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF). The analysis
indicated that 54.6% of collaborative research proposals were interdisciplinary, while 35.8% of individual research proposals
were interdisciplinary. The analysis of knowledge inflow/outflow structure showed that Natural science served as a link between
Life science and Engineering.
The aim of this study is to reveal the research growth, the distribution of research productivity and impact of genetic engineering
research in Japan, Korea and Taiwan by taking patent bibliometrics approach. This study uses quantitative methods adopt from
bibliometrics to analyze the patents granted to Japan, Korea and Taiwan by United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
from 1991 to 2002. In addition to patent and citation count, Bradford’s Law is applied to identify core assignees in genetic
engineering. Patent coupling approach is taken to further analyze the patents granted to the core assignees to enclose the
correlations among the core assignees.
13,055 genetic engineering patents were granted during the period of 1991 to 2002. Japan, Korea and Taiwan own 841 patents
and Japan owns most of them. 270 assignees shared 841 patents and 16 core assignees are identified by the Bradford’s Law.
18,490 patents were cited by the 13,055 patents and 1,146 out of the 18,490 cited patents were granted to Japan, Korea and
Taiwan. The results show Japan performs best in productivity and research impact among three countries. The core assignees
are also Japan based institutions and four technical clusters are identified by patent coupling.
Facing such serious problems in cultivating IT engineers as a mismatch in supply and demand of IT workers, shortage of globally
competitive IT professionals, and insufficient education and training of university graduates, the Korean government has decided
to adopt a new paradigm in national IT engineering education, based on supply chain management (SCM) in manufacturing. SCM
weights improving competitiveness of the supply chain as a whole via a long-term commitment to supply chain relationships
and a cooperative, integrated approach to business processes. These characteristics of SCM are believed to provide insight
into a more effective IT education and industry-university relationship. On the basis of the SCM literature, a model for industry-oriented
IT higher education is designed, and then applied in the field of computer-software engineering in Korea.
Beginning from the premise that research competitiveness at the university level is the starting point for national competitiveness
as a whole, this paper analyzes the correlation between university research-related performance and the scholarly or academic
resources available through a country’s library system. An analysis of this correlation from two different angles — a macroscopic
approach considering universities in OECD nations and a microscopic approach focusing only upon universities in Korea — found
that there is indeed a significant correlation between university research performance and the scholarly information available
at libraries. A regression analysis of the two approaches also found that the more journal titles subscribed to by university
libraries and the higher their budget for materials, the greater the contribution university libraries make to university
research competitiveness in Korea as well as other OECD countries. In this light, in order for Korea to reach a level of research
competitiveness comparable to other OECD members, policies need to be created that will effectively increase the number of
journals subscribed to by university libraries.
This study performs a webometric analysis to explore the communication characteristics of scientific knowledge in a national
scholarly Web space comprising top ranking universities and government supported research institutions in South Korea. We
found significant differences in scholarly communication activity as well as linking behavior among different subspaces in
addition to institutional differences. We also found the usefulness of the ADM approach in analyzing the metric data containing
extreme outliers and discovered the directory model as the most appropriate. Page counts were found significantly correlated
with inlinks as well as with outlinks at the directory level in the whole scholarly Web space.
It is well known from previous research activities that R&D collaboration among economic actors for knowledge production is
very important. An accompanying analysis of the impact of R&D collaboration on innovative performance has to be conducted
for transferring knowledge to the globalized knowledge-based economy. When we first investigated previous research concerning
R&D collaboration, we found some limitations in the analysis methodology. In order to overcome these limitations in previous
research, we applied a Bayesian network for analyzing the impact of R&D collaboration in Korean firms on their innovative
This article addresses the potential effectiveness of blind review in selecting and funding research proposals in a “scientifically
small” country. By analyzing 474 responses of the blinded reviewers ever worked for Korea Science and Engineering Fund, it
was found that blind review is fairly effective. About two thirds of the blinded reviewers were unable to recognize the applicants
accurately. The applicant detection was affected by (1) physical age, (2) professional experience, and (3) geographical location
of doctoral education of the applicant, (4) review experience, (5) rank of employing universities of the reviewers, and (6)
similirity of research interest between an applicant and a reviewer. It was also found that blind review was more strongly
advocated by those who had made a wrong guess or who had given up guessing. Implications of the findings and future research
directions were discussed.