Editorial delay, the time between submission and acceptance of scientific manuscripts, was investigated for a set of 4,540
papers published in 13 leading food research journals. Groups of accelerated papers were defined as those that fell in the
lower quartile of the distribution of the editorial delay for the journals investigated. Delayed papers are those in the upper
quartile of the distribution. Editorial stage is related to the peer review process and two variables were investigated in
search of any bias in editorial review that could influence publication delay: countries of origin of the manuscript and authors’
previous publishing experience in the same journal. A ranking of countries was established based on contributions to the leading
food research journals in the period 1999–2004 and four categories comprising heavy, medium, light and occasional country
producers was established. Chi square tests show significant differences in country provenance of manuscripts only for one
journal. The results for influence on editorial delay of cross-national research and international collaboration, conducted
by means of the Fisher statistic test, were similar. A two-tailed Student’s t test shows significant differences (p<0.05)
in the distribution of experienced and novel authors across the delayed and accelerated groups of papers. Although these results
are time and discipline limited, it can be concluded that authors’ publishing experience causes a faster review and acceptance
of their papers and that neither country of provenance nor cross-national research influence the time involved in editorial
acceptance of the papers.
Az Akadémiai Kiadó régi törekvése vált valóra az online kézirat-benyújtási program beindulásával. A szerkesztőségi munkát olyan modern, online rendszerrel szeretnénk segíteni, amely a szerkesztőség munkáját különösen a lektoráltatási
szakaszban támogatja. A piaci kínálatból azt a szolgáltatót igyekeztünk kiválasztani, amelyik a legkönnyebben használható megoldást ajánlja, s a legtöbb segítséget nyújtja a felhasználóknak a rendszer használata közben. Ezen rövid írás célja a rendszer bemutatása, a lehetőségek felvillantása.
Authors:Lutz Bornmann, Christophe Weymuth, and Hans-Dieter Daniel
Using the data of a comprehensive evaluation study on the peer review process of Angewandte Chemie International Edition (AC-IE), we examined in this study the way in which referees’ comments differ on manuscripts rejected at AC-IE and later
published in either a low-impact journal (Tetrahedron Letters, n = 54) or a high-impact journal (Journal of the American Chemical Society, n = 42). For this purpose, a content analysis was performed of comments which led to the rejection of the manuscripts at AC-IE.
For the content analysis, a classification scheme with thematic areas developed by Bornmann et al. (<cite>2008</cite>) was used. As the results of the analysis demonstrate, a large number of negative comments from referees in the areas “Relevance
of contribution” and “Design/Conception” are clear signs that a manuscript rejected at AC-IE will not be published later in
a high-impact journal. The number of negative statements in the areas “Writing/Presentation,” “Discussion of results,” “Method/Statistics,”
and “Reference to the literature and documentation,” on the other hand, had no statistically significant influence on the
probability that a rejected manuscript would later be published in a low- or high-impact journal. The results of this study
have various implications for authors, journal editors and referees.
The analysis of three
small hieratic papyrus fragments coming from a secondary burial place (Tomb B)
in the outer courtyard of TT 32 shows that the otherwise rare custom of
attaching the papyrus to the outer surfaces of mummy linen via a resinous
substance was not only occurring in Ptolemaic Akhmim but is thus attested in