Authors:Pauline Mattsson, Patrice Laget, Anna Nilsson, and Carl-Johan Sundberg
The increase of co-authored papers is a recognized fact. At the same time the factors influencing this change is not well
known. This article aims at studying the patterns of EU science co-authorships. We analyzed articles published in 18 EU countries
and their intra-EU (within EU) and extra-EU (with partners outside EU) co-publication pattern in five scientific fields. The
results point to a Europeanisation of shared co-authorship rather than an internationalization outside Europe. Smaller countries
co-authored more with other EU countries than bigger countries while the co-authorship rate with extra-EU partners was not
dependent of the country’s size. The co-authorship patterns were also found to depend on the scientific field. Engineering
and Computing & Technology was the field with the highest level of national publications and Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences
the field with the highest level of both intra-EU and extra-EU collaborations. These results support the view that a single
market for research is developing within the EU with a seamless extension of national systems into other Member States ones.
The Framework Programme (FP) is the main policy instrument of the European Union (EU) in the area of research and technological development. Introduced in the early 1980s to support European competitiveness in key
Authors:J. A. García, Rosa Rodriguez-Sánchez, and J. Fdez-Valdivia
In this paper we provide an objective ranking of top economics departments in the European Union (EU) and an assessment of how EU departments compare to the top economics departments in the United States
Authors:Robert D. Shelton and Geoffrey M. Holdridge
Both the United States and the European Union have set goals for worldwide leadership of science and technology. While the U. S. leads in most input quantitative indicators, output indicators may be more specific for determining present leadership. They show that the EU has taken the lead in important metrics and is challenging the U. S. in others. Qualitative indicators of fields of research and development, based on expert review studies organized by the authors, confirm that many EU labs are equal or better than those in the U. S.
Authors:Claude Robert, Concepción S. Wilson, Jean-François Gaudy, and Charles-Daniel Arreto
bibliometric analysis of the literature covering a one-year period (2003) was
performed to evaluate the number of scientific publications on sleep and its
distribution among the European Union countries. 912 articles appearing in Life
Sciences and Clinical Medicine journals indexed in the Institute for Scientific
Information databases were downloaded. These articles were authored by EU
researchers; Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy rank at the top of
the EU countries. The output distribution of the most productive EU countries
are also presented and discussed. Despite the limitations of the methods used,
the present results give an interesting snapshot of the EU publishing behavior
in sleep research.
Authors:Saeed-Ul Hassan, Peter Haddawy, Pratikshya Kuinkel, Alexander Degelsegger, and Cosima Blasy
in the course of the European Union (EU) FP7 funded project SEA-EU-NET. 1 First, bibliometric analyses have been conducted to investigate the features and trends of research activities of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries in
An earlier publication and citation analysis of Scandinavian clinical and social medicine 1988–96 reported that in particular Sweden and Denmark loose publication and citation world shares in many medical fields. In well fare systems such observations are alarming, and follow up studies and monitoring are thus carried out in selected medical fields. One such typical field is Psychiatry. It was decided to broaden the scope of analysis also to include the Netherlands with the European Union, USA and the world as comparative baselines. The period covered is 1981–98. This paper reports the findings and their implications on research policy. As in many other scientific fields the Psychiatric research output converges with respect to the US vs. EU in publication world shares. Both Denmark and Sweden suffer from stagnation in absolute publication numbers over the period and loose visibility dramatically in terms of world and EU shares. Finland and the Netherlands show steep growth rates. In terms of citations the picture is identical. Sweden declines dramatically its EU citation share from 13% to 6.5% during the period. The gap between EU and the US citation impact widens with USA on top. Among the analysed Northern EU countries only the Netherlands demonstrates an above-average impact. Other European players, like Belgium and Ireland, increasingly take part in Psychiatric research and show much higher citation impact than the Scandinavian well fare countries.
Authors:Michel Zitt, Suzy Ramanana-Rahary, Elise Bassecoulard, and Françoise Laville
This article depicts some features of the geography of science and technology outputs in the EU, with a particular attention
to regional “co-location” of these two pillars of the “knowledge-based society”. Economists have, for a decade, paid great
attention to local “spillovers” stating that industrial firms often draw advantages from the presence of nearby academic centres.
The presence in the same areas of strong academic and technological resources is both a condition and a result of science-technology
interactions. Concentrating on publications and patents as proxies of the science and technology level in regions, we built
a typology of regions according to their commitment to the two knowledge-base activities and then analysed the co-locations
of science and technology from several points of view. A fine-grain lattice, mainly based on standard Nuts3 level, was used.
Co-location, at the EU level, is not a general rule. A strong potential for spillover/ interaction does exist in the top-class
regions which concentrate a high proportion of European S and T output. But for regions with a small/medium level of S&T activity,
a divergence of orientations appears between a science-oriented family and a technology-oriented family, indicating an imbalance
between local S and T resources. If we look at the S-oriented regions, whilst controlling for underlying factors, such as
population and regional economic product, a significant geographic linkage between T and S appears. This suggests a trajectory
of science-based technological development. A careful examination of S&T thematic alignments and specialisation is necessary
to develop the hypothesis that fostering academic resources could increase the technological power along a growth path.