still others have suggested that this phenomenon only appears in certain experimental sciences (Franceschet and Costantini 2010 ). The debate has also taken place in the specific field of LibraryandInformationScience (LIS) (Hart 2007 ; Levitt and
has meant increased rapid changes for the libraryandinformationscience field (LIS), both in academia and practice. Several studies have analyzed the variation of the LIS domain from various perspectives, such as researcher ranking, content analyses
count vs. citation count), we began our examination of libraryandinformationscience (LIS) research in Korea with a bibliometric study of publications by LIS faculty in Korean universities. The study, which analyzed 2,401 peer-reviewed publications by
Authors:Chang-Ping Hu, Ji-Ming Hu, Yan Gao and Yao-Kun Zhang
During recent years, LibraryandInformationScience (LIS) in China has being changed dramatically along with the reform and opening policy of China and the rapid growth of Chinese economy (Wu and Yuan 1994 ). LIS
Authors:F. De Moya Anegón, E. Contreras and Mercedes Corrochano
Publications and author cocitations in library and information science in Spain during the period from 1985 to 1994 were analyzed
as a measure of the structure, specificity and composition of research fronts in this country. A cocitation matrix developed
from an ad hoc database was subjected to cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling and principal components analysis. The
resulting cocitation maps identified specific areas of research and their knowledge bases. We inferred the degree of consolidation
of the discipline of library and information science, and of the subdisciplines informetrics, librarianship and university
affiliation, from the research activities revealed. In this respect, the conclusions from the study show the existence of
several research fronts in Spanish literature the contents of which are in most cases difficult to compare with those in other
countries. A lesser degree of maturity of research in this field is shown.
This paper aims to identify the collaboration pattern and network structure of the coauthorship network of library and information
science (LIS) in China. Using data from 18 core source LIS journals in China covering 6 years, we construct the LIS coauthorship
network. We analyze the network from both macro and micro perspectives and identify some key features of this network: this
network is a small-world network, and follows the scale-free character. In the micro-level, we calculate each author’s centrality
values and compare them with citation counts. We find that centrality rankings are highly correlated with citation rankings.
We also discuss the limitation of current centrality measures for coauthorship network analysis.
This article reports findings from the study of the international contribution to the system of library and information science
communication in Poland in the years 2003–2005. The sample consists of articles published both in selected journals and collective
works. Two important dimensions determining the internationalization of local scholarly communication are considered: direct
contribution (foreign authors’ articles and papers and their translations published in Poland) and indirect contribution (citedness
of foreign authors’ documents in articles and papers published in Poland). Bibliographic data about the geographical distribution
and affiliation of foreign authors are gathered and analyzed. Furthermore, the findings of citation analysis are presented
to determine the percentage share of citations received by foreign documents as well as to find out what is the structure
of such citations regarding the language and form, which thematic areas are most replete with such citations and which foreign
journals are most cited in Poland.
We define the URL citations of a Web page to be the mentions of its URL in the text of other Web pages, whether hyperlinked
or not. The proportions of formal and informal scholarly motivations for creating URL citations to Library and Information
Science open access journal articles were identified. Five characteristics for each source of URL citations equivalent to
formal citations were manually extracted and the relationship between Web and conventional citation counts at the e-journal
level was examined. Results of Google searches showed that 282 research articles published in the year 2000 in 15 peer-reviewed
LIS open access journals were invoked by 3,045 URL citations. Of these URL citations, 43% were created for formal scholarly
reasons equivalent to traditional citations and 18% for informal scholarly reasons. Of the sources of URL citations, 82% were
in English, 88% were full text papers and 58% were non-HTML documents. Of the URL citations, 60% were text URLs only and 40%
were hyperlinked. About 50% of URL citations were created within one year after the publication of the cited e-article. A
slight correlation was found between average numbers of URL citations and average numbers of ISI citations for the journals
in 2000. Separating out the citing HTML and non-HTML documents showed that formal scholarly communication trends on the Web
were mainly influenced by text URL citations from non-HTML documents.
The paper describes the curriculum subject matter and its placement in the didactic processes at the Institute of Library and Information Science (Instytut Bibliotekoznawstwa i Informacji Naukowej IBIN) at the Warsaw University comparing some elements with other academic schools in Poland. Bibliographic traditions, and traditions in teaching the history of science are indicated as the basis for the present state of affairs. In addition to the discussion of classes and topics dealing with bibliometrics and scientometrics, also problems of reading list repertoire and subject matter of research work, connected with the didactic activity considered, are discussed. In the conclusions it is stated that inadequate explicitness of the scope and object of bibliometrics bears on the dispersion and lack of self-subsistence of bibliometrics substance.
This paper reports on a bibliometric study of the characteristics and impact of research in the library and information science
(LIS) field which was funded through research grant programs, and compares it with research that received no extra funding.
Seven core LIS journals were examined to identify articles published in 1998 that acknowledge research grant funding. The
distribution of these articles by various criteria (e.g., topic, affiliation, funding agency) was determined. Their impact
as indicated by citation counts during 1998–2008 was evaluated against that of articles without acknowledging extra funding
and published in the same journals in the same year using citation data collected from Scopus’ Citation Tracker. The impact
of grant-funded research as measured by citation counts was substantially higher than that of other research, both overall
and in each journal individually. Scholars from outside LIS core institutions contributed heavily to grant-funded research.
The two highest-impact publications by far reported non-grant-based research, and grant-based funding of research reported
in core LIS journals was biased towards the information retrieval (IR) area, particularly towards research on IR systems.
The percentage of articles reporting grant-funded research was substantially higher in information-oriented journals than
in library-focused ones.