Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 5 of 5 items for :

  • "Monthly Weather Review" x
  • All content x
Clear All

Abstract  

Editors of peer-reviewed journals obtain recommendations from peer reviewers as guidance in deciding upon the suitability of a submitted manuscript for publication. To investigate whether the number of reviewers used by an editor affects the rate at which manuscripts are rejected, 500 manuscripts submitted to Monthly Weather Review during 15.5 months in 2007–2008 were examined. Two and three reviewers were used for 306 and 155 manuscripts, respectively (92.2% of all manuscripts). Rejection rates for initial decisions and final decisions were not significantly different whether two or three reviewers were used. Manuscripts with more reviewers did not spend more rounds in review or have different rejection rates at each round. The results varied by editor, however, with some editors rejecting more two-reviewer manuscripts and others rejecting more three-reviewer manuscripts. Editors described using their scientific expertise in the decision-making process, either in determining the number of reviews to be sought or in making decisions once the reviews were received, approaches that differ from that of relying purely upon reviewer agreement as reported previously in the literature. A simple model is constructed for three decision-making strategies for editors: rejection when all reviewers recommend rejection, rejection when any reviewer recommends rejection, and rejection when a majority of reviewers recommend rejection. By plotting the probability of reviewer rejection against the probability of editor rejection, the decision-making process can be graphically illustrated, demonstrating that, for this dataset, editors are likely to reject a manuscript when any reviewer recommends rejection.

Restricted access

); others discourage multiple-part manuscripts (e.g., Journal of Neuroscience ); and yet others prohibit them (e.g., International Journal of Computer Mathematics ). I serve as the Chief Editor for Monthly Weather Review ( MWR ), which is one of

Restricted access

-scale parameters , Monthly Weather Review , Vol. 100 , No. 2 , 1972 , pp. 4 – 92 . [13] Allen R. , Pereira L. , Smith M. , Raes D. , Wright J

Restricted access

, Monthly Weather Review , 129 ( 2001 ) ( 3 ) 550 – 560 . [12] Mack , T. , Which stochastic model is underlying the chain ladder

Restricted access

J. Physical Oceanography 58 Monthly Weather Review 50 J. Coastal Research 49

Restricted access