Authors:Henri Delanghe, Brian Sloan, and Ugur Muldur
researchpolicy. Simply put, the ERA involves a European ‘internal market’ for research, where researchers, technology and knowledge circulate freely, effective European-level coordination of national and regional research activities, programmes and
Groot , T , Garcia-Valderrama , T 2006 Research quality and efficiency—An analysis of assessments and management issues in Dutch economics and business research programmes . ResearchPolicy 35 : 1362 – 1376 10.1016/j.respol.2006
This paper addresses the relation between developments in scientific communication and research. The developments in scientific
communication are related to developments brought about by opportunities provided by the development and wide-scale introduction
of modern information and communication technology. However, this paper does not focus on technological developments, but
rather discusses how these new developments in scientific communication enable developments in research and research policy,
and vice versa. The role of scientometrics and bibliometrics in this context is briefly discussed.
In the past 30 years various scientometric analyses have provided input data for research policy objectives of research institutions in the Netherlands. In this article we discuss several pioneering studies performed on behalf of the research councils for physics (FOM) and technical sciences (STW), which have played an important role in the early development of scientometrics in this country. The motives for these studies, the results and the influence on research policy are discussed. Relations to present themes in scientometric investigations are drawn.
Recent years have seen stem cell research rising to the forefront of biomedical science, public health and researchpolicy (Department of Health and Human Services 2001 , 2006 ).
“A stem cell is a special
In this paper, we describe the development of a methodology and an instrument to support a major research funding allocation decision by the Flemish government. Over the last decade, and in parallel with the decentralization and the devolution of the Belgian federal policy authority towards the various regions and communities in the country, science and technology policy have become a major component of regional policy making. In the Flemish region, there has been an increasing focus on basing the funding allocation decisions that originate from this policy decentralization on “objective, quantifiable and repeatable” decision parameters. One of the data sources and indicator bases that have received ample attention in this evolution is the use of bibliometric data and indicators. This has now led to the creation of a dedicated research and policy support staff, called “Steunpunt O&O Statistieken,” and the first time application of bibliometric data and methods to support a major inter-university funding allocation decision. In this paper, we analyze this evolution. We show how bibliometric data have for the first time been used to allocate 93 million Euro of public research money between 6 Flemish universities for the fiscal year 2003, based on Web-of-Science SCI data provided to “Steunpunt O&O Statistieken” via a license agreement with Thomson-ISI. We also discuss the limitations of the current approach that was based on inter-university publication and citation counts. We provide insights into future adaptations that might make it more representative of the total research activity at the universities involved (e.g., by including data for the humanities) and of its visibility (e.g., by including impact measures). Finally, based on our current experience and interactions with the universities involved, we speculate on the future of the specific bibliometric approach that has now been adopted. More specifically, we hypothesize that the allocation method now developed and under further improvement will become more criticized if it turns out that it (1) also starts influencing intra-university research allocation decisions and, as a consequence (2) introduces adverse publication and citation behaviors at the universities involved.
The primary aim of this paper is to assess the contribution to the international literature of Spanish scientific production
in the research stream of innovation and technology management. For this purpose 72 articles published in the last decade
in the most prestigious international journals in this research stream have been evaluated. From this analysis we have concluded
that there has been a positive evolution from 1995 to the present time, as much from a qualitative as from a quantitative
point of view. Likewise, we have found that research in this research stream is concentrated fundamentally on a reduced group
of universities. Nevertheless, these do not focus exclusively on one or a few research subjects, but on a wide range thereof.
Publication and citation profiles of Full and Associate Professors at the School of Chemistry of the Universidad de la Repblica
in Uruguay were investigated. The groups do not exhibit markedly different age averages. However, the average time since they
started publishing, as well as other characteristics of their publication records, like productivity or citations, set them
apart. From the point of view of both the number of papers per author and per year of activity, on one side, and of the number
of citations per year of activity, on the other, the group of Full Professors has statistically significant larger averages
than the Associate Professors. The impact of self-citations, multi-authorship and internationalization of the publications
were analyzed within the two groups and shown to have no excessive or predictable influence on those parameters, except in
the case of few (≤ 2) or many (>8) authors. It is suggested in this paper that these two indicators, number of papers per
author per production year and number of citations per production year, combined in a plot allowing a bidimensional ranking
of the individuals in the groups, may be used profitably as one of the components in the development of a policy toward promotion
of Associate Professors. The analysis showed also that the quotient of citations received to number of papers published, even
when derived from actual citation data of the scientists without involving the impact factors of the journals in which they
publish, are not good parameters to use for that purpose, essentially because there is a reduction in the information content
of the indicator with respect to those described before.
Authors:J. Rey, M. Martín, L. Plaza, J. Ibáñez, and Isabel Méndez
The aim of this study is to identify changes in publishing behavior of Spanish scientists belonging to the Area of Agronomy
of the Spanish Research Council (CSIC), in response to scientific policy actions carried out in Spain. For this purpose, we
analyze Spanish scientific output published in Spanish journals (covered by the ICYT database), as well as in international
journals (covered by theScience Citation Index), during the period 1980–1995. Congress and conference publications, books and monographs, are also considered. The following
changes in publication habits have been noticed: migration of works towards SCI journals and increased use of books and monographs
as channel of publication of research works. A decreasing participation of Spanish researchers in scientific meetings has
also been noticed, especially since 1989.
This paper reports on a bibliometric study of the characteristics and impact of research in the library and information science
(LIS) field which was funded through research grant programs, and compares it with research that received no extra funding.
Seven core LIS journals were examined to identify articles published in 1998 that acknowledge research grant funding. The
distribution of these articles by various criteria (e.g., topic, affiliation, funding agency) was determined. Their impact
as indicated by citation counts during 1998–2008 was evaluated against that of articles without acknowledging extra funding
and published in the same journals in the same year using citation data collected from Scopus’ Citation Tracker. The impact
of grant-funded research as measured by citation counts was substantially higher than that of other research, both overall
and in each journal individually. Scholars from outside LIS core institutions contributed heavily to grant-funded research.
The two highest-impact publications by far reported non-grant-based research, and grant-based funding of research reported
in core LIS journals was biased towards the information retrieval (IR) area, particularly towards research on IR systems.
The percentage of articles reporting grant-funded research was substantially higher in information-oriented journals than
in library-focused ones.