Search Results
A variety of explanations have been offered for the observed cross-linguistic preponderance of suffixes over prefixes. Many are couched in terms of synchronic advantages, such as the cognitive simplicity of cross-category harmony between syntax and morphology, and preferences for processing the lexical meaning in stems before the grammatical material in affixes. But hypotheses about functional advantages cannot constitute explanations in themselves without accounts of the mechanisms by which the advantages are translated into grammatical structure. Here it is shown that the numerous exceptions to such hypotheses can be explained when the individual histories of the affixes are considered, including both their sources and the steps by which they develop.
are derived unergatives . In M. Ziková and M. Docekal (eds.) Slavic languages in formal grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brn.me 2010. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 291–306. Moravcsik , Edith. 1972 . Some cross-linguistic generalisations about
are the most frequent and labial clusters are the least frequent. Both observations are in line with cross-linguistic generalisations. The one relating to voicing is not true of languages that have an active or a historical post-nasal voicing process
