The kinetics of reduction at relatively low temperatures with hydrogen of pure and doped metastable non-stoichiometric magnetite
with 1 at% Mn, Co, Ni and Cu and also with 5 at % Ni and Cu have been investigated by using isothermal thermogravimetry in
the temperature range 300–400°C. With increase in the concentration of the dopant (5 at% Ni and Cu), the reactivity increases.
The activation energies for pure magnetite varies from 7 to 9 kcal/mole with the preparation temperature of precursorf Fe2O3 (250–400°C), being the lowest for those prepared at the lowest temperatures. The corresponding activation energies for the
reduction of doped samples (Fe, M)3−zO4, it depends, apart from their porosity and surface areas, on the nature of the solute atom, amount of disorder, whether it
occupies the tetrahedral (A) or octahedral (B) sites in the non-stoichiometric spinel and possibly on hydrogen ‘Spill over’
Kinetics of the oxidation of magnetite (Fe3O4) to hematite (a-Fe2O3) are studied in air using simultaneous TG/DSC. The mechanism is complex and the differences between the kinetic conclusions
and Arrhenius parameters based on either TG or DSC are discussed. As in our previous work on CaCO3 , the determination of a satisfactory baseline for the DSC results adds considerable uncertainty to those kinetic results.
Consequently the calculations based on the TG data are considered superior. Solid state reactivity varies from one source
of material to another and the results are compared for two different commercial samples of magnetite, both presumably prepared
by wet chemical methods. These materials are much more reactive than the material studied previously , which had been coarsened
and refined at high temperatures. In that earlier study, the metastable spinel, g-Fe2O3, was formed as an intermediate in the oxidation to the final stable form, a-Fe2O3. The exothermic reaction of the gamma to alpha form of the product during the oxidation process destroys the direct comparison
between the TG and DSC results, since the former only detects the change in mass of the sample and not the crystallographic
transformation. The TG results, however, represent the true oxidation process without superposition of the structural aspects.