Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 46 items for :

  • "work addiction" x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Authors:
Mark D. Griffiths
,
Zsolt Demetrovics
, and
Paweł A. Atroszko

studies. Norwegian studies reported that approximately 7.3%–8.3% of Norwegians were addicted to work using the Bergen Work Addiction Scale ( Andreassen, Griffiths, Hetland, & Pallesen, 2012 ; Andreassen, Nielsen, Pallesen, & Gjerstad, in press ). A

Open access

Myths about “The myths about work addiction”

Commentary on: Ten myths about work addiction (Griffiths et al., 2018)

Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Authors:
Cecilie Schou Andreassen
,
Wilmar B. Schaufeli
, and
Ståle Pallesen

Introduction Griffiths, Demetrovics, and Atroszko ( 2018 ) present and discuss 10 myths about work addiction/workaholism. Strangely enough, they do so without explicitly defining work addiction. In this paper, we show that

Open access
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Authors:
Bernadette Kun
,
Zsofia K. Takacs
,
Mara J. Richman
,
Mark D. Griffiths
, and
Zsolt Demetrovics

, 2018 ). Although “work addiction” is not included in either the DSM-5 ( American Psychiatric Association, 2013 ) or the ICD-11 ( Iler et al., 2019; World Health Organization, 2018 ), it has often been cited and referred to in the behavioral addiction

Open access

How to counter the ten myths about work addiction?: Three postulates for future research

Commentary on: Ten myths about work addiction (Griffiths et al., 2018)

Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Author:
Diana Malinowska

upon the 10 myths about work addiction, Griffiths, Demetrovics, and Atroszko ( 2018 ) initiated a necessary scientific debate on what we know and do not know about people who are addicted. Although scientists present mostly numbers, behind these numbers

Open access

In the last decade there has been increasing attention towards the phenomenon of work addiction – a behavioral addiction characterized by a persistent and dysfunctional form of heavy work investment potentially leading to clinically relevant

Open access

Work addiction: An organizational behavior as well as an addictive behavior?

Commentary on: Ten myths about work addiction (Griffiths et al., 2018)

Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Authors:
Oren Lior
,
Reizer Abira
, and
Weinstein Aviv

Griffiths, Demetrovics, and Atroszko ( 2018 ) in their comprehensive review article discuss 10 myths in the study of work addiction. Before relating to these 10 myths, the authors indicated the problematic state of theorizing and research in

Open access

addiction was conceptualized within contemporary theories of (and research into) “work addiction” (i.e., workaholism) and defined as “being overly concerned with studying, driven by an uncontrollable motivation to study, and investing so much time and effort

Open access

Beyond the myths about work addiction: Toward a consensus on definition and trajectories for future studies on problematic overworking

A response to the commentaries on: Ten myths about work addiction (Griffiths et al., 2018)

Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Authors:
Paweł A. Atroszko
,
Zsolt Demetrovics
, and
Mark D. Griffiths

Introduction In a collaborative effort to integrate the existing knowledge on work addiction and delineate trajectories for future studies, eight commentaries by 15 authors responded to our deliberately provocative debate paper

Open access

Introduction The article Ten myths about work addiction by Griffiths, Demetrovics, and Atroszko ( 2018 ) is a narrative review on work addiction (WA). Today, gambling disorder is the only behavioral addiction in fifth edition

Open access

Seeing the forest through different trees: A social psychological perspective of work addiction

Commentary on: Ten myths about work addiction (Griffiths et al., 2018)

Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Authors:
István Tóth-Király
,
Beáta Bőthe
, and
Gábor Orosz

Introduction We welcome the debate paper of Griffiths, Demetrovics, and Atroszko ( 2018 ) in which they address key myths and issues related to the scientific study of work addiction (WA). In the following commentary, we would

Open access