View More View Less
  • 1 PTE ÁOK
  • 2 PTE BTK
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $204.00

Elmeolvasó készségünk teszi lehetővé, hogy mások mentális állapotait — észleleteit, szándékait, vélekedéseit — leképezzük, és saját hasonló állapotainktól megkülönböztessük. Ezt a teljesítményt közel negyven éve sajátosan emberi készségnek tételezzük. Az utóbbi évtizedben egyre több bizonyíték szól amellett, hogy a vélekedésolvasás készségének létezik egy implicit formája, melyen automatikus kognitív működéseket értünk. Ugyanakkor kétséges, hogy az automatikus folyamatok során valóban mentális állapotokat reprezentálunk-e. Az implicit működések jelenleg főként viselkedéses mérésen keresztül ragadhatóak meg. Egyes viselkedéses változók pedig nemcsak a vélekedésolvasás lehetséges kifejeződéseként, hanem egyúttal a készség birtoklásának fontos bizonyítékaként is értelmezhetőek. Ugyanakkor eddig kevés figyelem irányult ezen viselkedések lehetséges funkcióinak feltárására. Jelen tanulmányunkban azt a célt tűztük ki, hogy funkcionális értelmezési lehetőségeket kínáljunk az implicit elmeolvasó paradigmákban megjelenő két spontán viselkedésre: a viselkedésjósló szemmozgásra és a közbeavatkozó-korrigáló viselkedésre. Alkalmazott módszerünk a szelektív irodalomelemzés, melynek során az implicit vélekedésolvasás erős bizonyítékait vizsgáljuk meg közelebbről. Eredményeink szerint a viselkedésjósló szemmozgások a szelf és a másik perspektívájának és szándékának az egyesítését, míg a korrigáló-közbeavatkozó viselkedés a saját és a másik reprezentációinak a különválasztását erősítik. Megbeszélésünkben kitérünk a spontán viselkedések szerepére az elmeolvasás atipikus működése terén.

  • Apperly, I. (2010). Mindreaders: the cognitive basis of „theory of mind”. Psychology Press.

  • Baillargeon, R. (1987). Young infants’ reasoning about the physical and spatial properties of a hidden object. Cognitive Development, 2(3), 179200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M., & He, Z. (2010). False-belief understanding in infants. Trends in cognitive sciences, 14(3), 110118.

  • Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E. S., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object permanence in five-month-old infants. Cognition, 20(3), 191208.

  • Bugnyar, T. (2010). Knowe-guesser differentiation in ravens: others’ viewpoints matter. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, rspb20101514.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Eighteen-month-old infants show false belief understanding in an active helping paradigm. Cognition, 112(2), 337342.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2013). How to construct a minimal theory of mind. Mind & Language, 28(5), 606637.

  • Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in cognitive sciences, 12(5), 18792.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cannon, E. N., & Woodward, A. L. (2012). Infants generate goal-based action predictions. Developmental science, 15(2), 292298.

  • Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Breton, C. (2002). How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory. Infant and Child Development, 11(2), 7392.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carruthers, P. (2013). Mindreading in infancy. Mind & Language, 28(2), 14172.

  • Carruthers, P. (2015). Two systems for mindreading? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 122.

  • Clements, W. A., & Perner, J. (1994). Implicit understanding of belief. Cognitive development, 9(4), 377395.

  • Daum, M. M., Attig, M., Gunawan, R., Prinz, W., & Gredebäck, G. (2012). Actions seen through babies’ eyes: A dissociation between looking time and predictive gaze. Anticipation and the control of voluntary action, 116.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dennett, D. C. (1989). The intentional stance. NY: MIT Press.

  • Deschrijver, E., Bardi, L., Wiersema, J. R., & Brass, M. (2015). Behavioral measures of implicit theory of mind in adults with high functioning autism. Cognitive Neuroscience, (justaccepted).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fabricius, W. V., & Khalil, S. L. (2003). False beliefs or false positives? Limits on children’s understanding of mental representation. Journal of Cognition and Development, 4(3), 239262.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frith, C. D. (2012). The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 22132223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garnham, W. A., & Ruffman, T. (2001). Doesn’t see, doesn’t know: Is anticipatory looking really related to understanding of belief? Developmental Science, 4(1), 94100.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gomez, J. C. (1996). Nonhuman primates theories of (nonhuman primate) minds: Some issues concerning the origins of mindreading. In P. Carruthers, & P. K. Smith (Eds), Theories of Theories of Mind (pp. 330343). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haith, M. M. (1998). Who put the cog in infant cognition? Is rich interpretation too costly?. Infant behavior and development, 21(2), 167179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heyes, C. (2014). Submentalizing I Am Not Really Reading Your Mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(2), 131143.

  • Heyes, C. (2014). False belief in infancy: a fresh look. Developmental science, 17(5), 647659.

  • Heyes, C. M. (1993). Anecdotes, training, trapping and triangulating: do animals attribute mental states?. Animal Behaviour, 46(1), 177188.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heyes, C. M., & Frith, C. D. (2014). The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science, 344(6190), 1243091.

  • Hood, B. M., Cole-Davis, V., & Dias, M. (2003). Looking and search measures of object knowledge in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 39, 6170.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kampis, D., Parise, E., Csibra, G., & Kovács, Á. M. (2015). Neural signatures for sustaining object representations attributed to others in preverbal human infants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1819), 1683.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaufman, J., Csibra, G., & Johnson, M. H. (2005). Oscillatory activity in the infant brain reflects object maintenance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(42), 1527115274.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knudsen, B., & Liszkowski, U. (2012). 18-Month-Olds Predict Specific Action Mistakes Through Attribution of False Belief, Not Ignorance, and Intervene Accordingly. Infancy, 17(6), 672691.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knudsen, B., & Liszkowski, U. (2012b). Eighteen-and 24-month-old infants correct others in anticipation of action mistakes. Developmental science, 15(1), 113122.

  • Kovács, Á. M., Téglás, E., & Endress, A. D. (2010). The social sense: Susceptibility to others’ beliefs in human infants and adults. Science, 330(6012), 18301834.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leslie, A. M. (1994). ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core Architecture and Domain Specificity. In L. Hirschfeld & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the Mind: domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leslie, A. M., & Polizzi, P. (1998). Inhibitory processing in the false belief task: Two conjectures. Developmental Science, 1(2), 247253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leslie, A. M., German, T. P., & Polizzi, P. (2005). Belief-desire reasoning as a process of selection. Cognitive Psychology, 50(1), 4585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, D., Wellman, H. M., Tardif, T., & Sabbagh, M. A. (2008). Theory of mind development in Chinese children: a meta-analysis of false-belief understanding across cultures and languages. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 523.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs?. Science, 308(5719), 255258.

  • Perner, J. (2010). Who took the cog out of cognitive science? In P. A. Frensch & R. Schwarzer (Eds), Cognition and neuropsychology: International perspectives on psychological science, 1 (pp. 241263). New York: Psychology Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Perner, J., & Ruffman, T. (2005). Infants’ insight into the mind: How deep. Science, 308(5719), 214216.

  • Povinelli, D. J., & Vonk, J. (2003). Chimpanzee minds: suspiciously human? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 157160.

  • Rakoczy, H. (2012). Do infants have a theory of mind? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 5974.

  • Ruffman, T. (1996). Do children understand the mind by means of simulation or a theory? Evidence from their understanding of inference. Mind & Language, 11(4), 388414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shahaeian, A., Peterson, C. C., Slaughter, V., & Wellman, H. M. (2011). Culture and the sequence of steps in theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Santiesteban, I., Catmur, C., Hopkins, S. C., Bird, G., & Heyes, C. (2014). Avatars and arrows: Implicit mentalizing or domain-general processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 929.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saxe, R. (2006). Uniquely human social cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(2), 235239.

  • Schaafsma, S. M., Pfaff, D. W., Spunt, R. P., & Adolphs, R. (2015). Deconstructing and reconstructing theory of mind. Trends in cognitive sciences, 19(2), 6572.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schneider, D., Bayliss, A. P., Becker, S. I., & Dux, P. E. (2012). Eye movements reveal sustained implicit processing of others’ mental states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 433438.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schneider, D., Lam, R., Bayliss, A. P., & Dux, P. E. (2012). Cognitive load disrupts implicit theory-of-mind processing. Psychological Science, 23(8), 842847.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schneider, D., Nott, Z. E., & Dux, P. E. (2014). Task instructions and implicit theory of mind. Cognition, 133(1), 4347.

  • Schneider, D., Slaughter, V. P., Bayliss, A. P., & Dux, P. E. (2013). A temporally sustained implicit theory of mind deficit in autism spectrum disorders. Cognition, 129(2), 410417.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scott, R. M., & Baillargeon, R. (2009). Which penguin is this? Attributing false beliefs about object identity at 18 months. Child Development, 80(4), 11721196.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Senju, A., Southgate, V., White, S., & Frith, U. (2009). Mindblind eyes: an absence of spontaneous theory of mind in Asperger syndrome. Science, 325(5942), 883885.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sirois, S., & Jackson, I. (2007). Social cognition in infancy: A critical review of research on higher order abilities. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4(1), 4664.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Song, H. J., Onishi, K. H., Baillargeon, R., & Fisher, C. (2008). Can an agent’s false belief be corrected by an appropriate communication? Psychological reasoning in 18-month-old infants. Cognition, 109(3), 295315.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Southgate, V. (2013). Early manifestations of mind reading. In S Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & M. Lombardo (Eds), Understanding other minds (pp. 318). Oxford: University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Southgate, V., Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2007). Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds. Psychological Science, 18(7), 587592.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Southgate, V., & Vernetti, A. (2014). Belief-based action prediction in preverbal infants. Cognition, 130(1), 110.

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind & Language, 17(1–2), 323.

  • Surian, L., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Competence and performance in false belief understanding: A comparison of autistic and normal 3-year-old children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(1), 141155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tuomela, R. (2005). We-intentions revisited. Philosophical Studies, 125(3), 327369.

  • Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science, 311(5765), 13011303.

  • Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655684.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION

  • Psychology (miscellaneous) SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q4
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 0.169
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 6

Language: Hungarian

Founded in 1928
Publication: One volume of four issues annually
Publication Programme: 2020. Vol. 75.
Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • PsycINFO

 

Subscribers can access the electronic version of every printed article.

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fülöp, Márta

Chair of the Editorial Board:
Molnár, Márk

          Area Editors

  • Bereczkei Tamás (Evolutionary psychology)
  • Demetrovics Zsolt (Clinical psychology)
  • Egyed Katalin (Developmental psychology)
  • Hámori Eszter (Clinical child psychology)
  • Molnárné Kovács Judit (Social psychology)
  • Rózsa Sándor (Personality psychology and psychometrics)
  • Nguyen Luu Lan Anh (Cross-cultural psychology)
  • Pléh Csaba (Book Review)
  • Sass Judit (Industrial and organizational psychology)
  • Szabó Éva (Educational psychology)
  • Urbán Róbert (Health psychology)
  • Csákvári judit (Psychology of special education)
  • Faragó Klára (Organizational psychology)
  • Szabolcs Kéri (Experimental and Neuropsychology)

 

        Editorial Board

  • Császár Noémi
  • Csépe Valéria
  • Dúll Andrea
  • Ehmann Bea
  • Erős Ferenc
  • Gervai Judit
  • Kiss Enikő Csilla
  • Kiss Paszkál
  • Mészáros Judit
  • Németh Dezső
  • Oláh Attila
  • Péley Bernadette
  • Perczel-Forintos Dóra
  • Révész György
  • Winkler István
  • Molnár Márk
  • Fülöp Márta

 

Secretary of the editorial board: 

  •  Saád Judit

 

Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle
ELTE PPK Pszichológiai Intézet
Address: H-1064 Budapest, Izabella u. 46.
E-mail: pszichoszemle@gmail.com