A ritmikai és a nyelvi, illetve olvasási képességek közötti kapcsolatot a gyakorlati megfi gyeléseken túl számos kutatás eredménye látszik alátámasztani, ugyanakkor a magyar anyanyelvű gyerekeket vizsgáló munkák száma ez idáig csekély. 39 tipikus első osztályos (6–7 éves) tanuló vizsgálatára került sor a tanév kezdetekor egy digitális, gyermekek számára kialakított ritmikai szinkronizációt és spontán motoros tempót mérő teszt, valamint egy ritmusreprodukciós feladatsor segítségével. A tanév végén felmértük a gyerekeket a fonológiai tudatosság, valamint a szóolvasás területein. Az olvasás színvonala és a fonológiai tudatosság is szignifi káns kapcsolatot mutatott a szinkronizációs és a spontán tempó feladat több mutatójával, ugyanakkor a ritmusreprodukciós feladat nem rendelkezett hasonló prediktív erővel. Bár a minta nagysága messzemenő következtetések levonására nem alkalmas, az eredmények egy irányba mutatnak a külföldi szakirodalomban találhatókkal, és azonkívül, hogy további vizsgálatok szükségességét jelzik, felhívják a fi gyelmet a korai ritmikai fejlesztés fontosságára.
A growing body of research supports the link between rhythmic abilities and the development of language and reading, while investigations carried out with Hungarian speaking children are sparse. The rhythmic abilities of 39 typically developing, 6-7 year old, Hungarian native-speaking children were assessed at the beginning of their fi rst school year in three domains: rhythm reproduction, tapping to a regular musical beat, and unpaced tapping, using a digital test suitable for their age. At the end of the school year, children completed tests of phonological awareness and reading abilities. Both showed signifi cant correlation with several indicators of the tapping tasks. Surprisingly however, rhythm reproduction did not predict either of them. Although the moderate sample size of our present study does not allow far-reaching conclusions, our fi ndings are congruent with previous literature, and in addition to the need for further research, stresses the importance of early rhythmic activities.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
Alcock, K. J., Passingham, R. E., Watkins, K., & Vargha-Khadem, F. (2000). Pitch and timing abilities in inherited speech and language impairment. Brain and Language, 75(1), 34–46.
-
Besson, M., & Schön, D. (2011). What remains of modularity? In Rebuschat, P., Rohrmeier, M., Hawkins, J., Crosseds, I. (Eds), Language and Music as Cognitive Systems (pp. 283–291). Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
-
Bonacina, S., Krizman, J., White-Schwoch, T., & Kraus, N. (2018). Clapping in time parallels literacy and calls upon overlapping neural mechanisms in early readers. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1423(1), 338–348.
-
Chang, H., & Trehub, S. E. (2017). Infants’ Perception of Temporal Grouping in Auditory Patterns. Child Development Stable, 48(4), 1666–1670. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1128532 R
-
Colling, L. J., Noble, H. L., & Goswami, U. (2017). Neural Entrainment and Sensorimotor Synchronization to the Beat in Children with Developmental Dyslexia: An EEG Study. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11, 360.
-
Corriveau, K. H., & Goswami, U. (2009). Rhythmic motor entrainment in children with speech and language impairments: Tapping to the beat. Cortex, 45(1), 119–130.
-
Cumming, R., Wilson, A., Leong, V., Colling, L. J., & Goswami, U. (2015). Awareness of Rhythm Patterns in Speech and Music in Children with Specifi c Language Impairments. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 672.
-
Csépe, V. (2006). Az olvasó agy. Akadémiai.
-
Csépe, V. (2014). Az olvasás rendszere, fejlődése és modelljei. In Pléh, Cs., Lukács, Á. (szerk.), Pszicholingvisztika 1–2. Magyar pszicholingvisztikai kézikönyv (pp. 339–370). Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó.
-
David, D., Wade-Woolley, L., Kirby, J. R., & Smithrim, K. (2007). Rhythm and reading development in school-age children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(2), 169–183.
-
Dellatolas, G., Watier, L., Le Normand, M. T., Lubart, T., & Chevrie-Muller, C. (2009). Rhythm reproduction in kindergarten, reading performance at second grade, and developmental dyslexia theories. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(6), 555–563.
-
Drake, C., Jones, M. R., & Baruch, C. (2000). The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences: Attunement, referent period, focal attending. Cognition, 77.
-
Drewing, K., Aschersleben, G., & Li, S.-C. (2006). Sensorimotor synchronization across the life span. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(3), 280–287.
-
Einarson, K. M., & Trainor, L. J. (2016). Hearing the beat: Young children’s perceptual sensitivity to beat alignment varies according to metric structure. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 34(1), 56–70.
-
Flaugnacco, E., Lopez, L., Terribili, C., Montico, M., Zoia, S., & Schön, D. (2015). Music training increases phonological awareness and reading skills in developmental dyslexia: A randomized control trial. PLoS ONE, 10(9), 1–17.
-
Flaugnacco, E., Lopez, L., Terribili, C., Zoia, S., Buda, S., Tilli, S., et al. (2014). Rhythm perception and production predict reading abilities in developmental dyslexia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 392.
-
François, C., Chobert, J., Besson, M., & Schön, D. (2013). Music training for the development of speech segmentation. Cerebral Cortex, 23(9), 2038–2043.
-
Gembris, H. (2002). Grundlagen musikalischer Entwicklung unter dem spezifi schen Aspekt der Kommunikation. www.groups.uni-paderborn.de/ibfm
-
Giraud, A. L., & Poeppel, D. (2012). Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience, 15(4), 511–517.
-
Gordon, R. L., Shivers, C. M., Wieland, E. A., Kotz, S. A., Yoder, P. J., & Devin Mcauley, J. (2015). Musical rhythm discrimination explains individual differences in grammar skills in children. Developmental Science, 18(4), 635–644.
-
Goswami, U. (2018). A Neural Basis for Phonological Awareness? An Oscillatory Temporal-Sampling Perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 56–63.
-
Háden, G. P., Honing, H., Török, M., & Winkler, I. (2015). Detecting the temporal structure of sound sequences in newborn infants. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 96(1), 23–28.
-
Jordanidisz, Á. (2009). A fonológiai tudatosság fejlődése az olvasástanulás időszakában. Anyanyelv–Pedagógia, 2(4).
-
Kertész, Cs. (2018) Ritmus és nyelv – atipikus nyelvi fejlődésű gyerekek zenei tempótartásának vizsgálata számítógépes mérőeszközzel. Pécs, PTE MK Zeneművészeti Intézet.
-
Kirschner, S., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Joint drumming: social context facilitates synchronization in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(3), 299–314.
-
Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010). Music training for the development of auditory skills. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(8), 599–605.
-
Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106(1), 119.
-
Lundetræ, K., & Thomson, J. M. (2018). Rhythm production at school entry as a predictor of poor reading and spelling at the end of fi rst grade. Reading and Writing, 31(1), 215–237.
-
Maróti, E., Barabás, E., Deszpot, G., Farnadi, T., Norbert Nemes, L., Szirányi, B., & Honbolygó, F. (2019). Does moving to the music make you smarter? The relation of sensorimotor entrainment to cognitive, linguistic, musical, and social skills. Psychology of Music, 47(5), 663–679.
-
McAuley, J. D., Jones, M. R., Holub, S., Johnston, H. M., & Miller, N. S. (2006). The time of our lives: Life span development of timing and event tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(3), 348–367.
-
Meixner, I. (1993). A dyslexia prevenció, reedukáció módszere. Budapest: Bárczi Gusztáv Gyógypedagógiai Tanárképző Főiskola.
-
Miendlarzewska, E. A., & Trost, W. J. (2014). How musical training affects cognitive development: Rhythm, reward and other modulating variables. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7(8 Jan), 1–18.
-
Moelants, D. (2002). Preferred tempo reconsidered. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, 2002, 1–4. Sydney.
-
Moreno, S., & Bidelman, G. M. (2014). Examining neural plasticity and cognitive benefi t through the unique lens of musical training. Hearing Research, 308, 84–97.
-
Moreno, S., & Farzan, F. (2015). Music training and inhibitory control: A multidimensional model. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337(1), 147–152.
-
Moritz, C., Yampolsky, S., Papadelis, G., Thomson, J., & Wolf, M. (2013). Links between early rhythm skills, musical training, and phonological awareness. Reading and Writing, 26(5), 739–769.
-
Nettl, B. (2000). An ethnomusicologist contemplates universals in musical sound and musical culture. The Origins of Music, 463–472.
-
Ozernov-Palchik, O., & Patel, A. D. (2018). Musical rhythm and reading development: Does beat processing matter? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1423(1), 166–175.
-
Phillips-Silver, J., & Trainor, L. J. (2005). Psychology: Feeling the beat: Movement infl uences infant rhythm perception. Science, 308(5727), 1430.
-
Politimou, N., Dalla Bella, S., Farrugia, N., & Franco, F. (2019). Born to speak and sing: Musical predictors of language development in pre-schoolers. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(Apr), 1–18.
-
Provasi, Joëlle, Anderson, D. I., & Barbu-Roth, M. (2014). Rhythm perception, production, and synchronization during the perinatal period. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(Sep), 1–16.
-
Provasi, Joëlle, & Bobin-Bègue, A. (2003). Spontaneous motor tempo and rhythmical synchronisation in 2½-and 4-year-old children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(3), 220–231.
-
Provasi, Joëlle, & Bobin-Bègue, A. (2008). Régulation rythmique avant 4 ans: effet d’un tempo auditif sur le tempo moteur. L’Année Psychologique, 108(4), 631–658.
-
Puyjarinet, F., Bégel, V., Lopez, R., Dellacherie, D., & Dalla Bella, S. (2017). Children and adults with Attention-Defi cit/Hyperactivity Disorder cannot move to the beat. Scientifi c Reports, 7(1), 1–11.
-
Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 969–992.
-
Repp, B. H. (2006). Rate Limits of Sensorimotor Synchronization. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2(2), 163–181.
-
Repp, B. H., & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403–452.
-
Richards, S. M. (2017). Rhythmic Sensitivity and Developmental Language Disorder in Children. University of Cambridge.
-
Rocha-Thomas, S.-E. (2018). Do we dance because we walk? The impact of regular vestibular experience on the early development of beat production and perception. Birkbeck: University of London.
-
Sipos, Z. (2015). A 3. évfolyamosok olvasásának vizsgálatára kidolgozott Meixner-olvasólap sztenderdizálásának első eredményei. https://docplayer.hu/105487901-A-3-evfolyamosok-olvasasanak-vizsgalatara-kidolgozott-meixner-olvasolap-sztenderdizalasanak-elso-eredmenyei.html
-
Snyder, J., & Krumhansl, C. L. (2001). Tapping to ragtime: Cues to pulse fi nding. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 455–489.
-
Steinbrink, C., Knigge, J., Mannhaupt, G., Sallat, S., & Werkle, A. (2019). Are temporal and tonal musical skills related to phonological awareness and literacy skills?-Evidence from two cross-sectional studies with children from different age groups. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(Mar), 1–16.
-
Surányi, Z., Csépe, V., Richardson, U., Thomson, J. M., Honbolygó, F., & Goswami, U. (2009). Sensitivity to rhythmic parameters in dyslexic children: A comparison of Hungarian and English. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 41–56.
-
Thompson, E. C., White-Schwoch, T., Tierney, A., & Kraus, N. (2015). Beat Synchronization across the Lifespan: Intersection of Development and Musical Experience. PLOS ONE, 10(6), e0128839.
-
Todd, N. P. M., & Lee, C. S. (2015). The sensory-motor theory of rhythm and beat induction 20 years on: a new synthesis and future perspectives. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 444.
-
Török, T., & Hódi, Á. (2015). A fonológiai tudatosság fejlődése és szövegértéssel való kapcsolata az általános iskola első négy évfolyamán a szocioökonómiai státusz tükrében. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 70(4), 807–826.
-
Ullman, M. T., & Pierpont, E. I. (2005). Specifi c language impairment is not specifi c to language: The procedural defi cit hypothesis. Cortex, 41(3), 399–433.
-
Van Noorden, L., & De ruyn, L. (2009). The development of synchronization skills of children 3 to 11 years old. Proceedings of ESCOM—7th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
-
Van Noorden, L., & Moelants, D. (1999). Resonance in the perception of musical pulse. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 43–66.
-
Winkler, I., Háden, G. P., Ladinig, O., Sziller, I., & Honing, H. (2009). Newborn infants detect the beat in music. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(7), 2468–2471.
-
Wohlschläger, A., & Koch, R. (2000). Synchronization error: An error in time perception. In P. Desain & L. Windsor, Rhythm perception and performance (pp. 115–127). Lisse, The Nether lands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
-
Wolff, P. H. (2002). Timing precision and rhythm in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing , 15(1/2), 179–206.
-
Wong, P. C. M., Skoe, E., Russo, N. M., Dees, T., & Kraus, N. (2007). Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 10(4), 420–422.
-
Woodruff arr, K., White-Schwoch, T., Tierney, A. T., Strait, D. L., & Kraus, N. (2014). Beat synchronization predicts neural speech encoding and reading readiness in preschoolers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(40), 14559–14564.
-
Yang, J., Ouyang, F., Holm, L., Huang, Y., Gan, L., Zhou, L., et al. (2020). Tapping ahead of time: its association with timing variability. Psychological Research, 84, 343–351.
-
Zentner, M., & Eerola, T. (2010). Rhythmic engagement with music in infancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(13), 5768–5773.
Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle
ELTE PPK Pszichológiai Intézet
Address: H-1064 Budapest, Izabella u. 46.
E-mail: pszichoszemle@gmail.com
Indexing and Abstracting Services:
- PsycINFO
- Scopus
- CABELLS Journalytics
| 2021 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Total Cites WoS |
not indexed |
| Journal Impact Factor | not indexed |
| Rank by Impact Factor | not indexed |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
not indexed |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Journal Citation Indicator | not indexed |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator | not indexed |
| Scimago | |
| Scimago H-index |
8 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,117 |
| Scimago Quartile Score | Psychology (miscellaneous) (Q4) |
| Scopus | |
| Scopus Cite Score |
0,3 |
| Scopus CIte Score Rank |
General Psychology 200/209 (Q4) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,366 |
| 2020 | |
|---|---|
| Scimago H-index |
7 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,142 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Psychology (miscellaneous) Q4 |
| Scopus Cite Score |
17/111=0,2 |
| Scopus Cite Score Rank |
General Psychology 199/203 (Q4) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,079 |
| Scopus Cites |
53 |
| Scopus Documents |
24 |
| Days from submission to acceptance | 116 |
| Days from acceptance to publication | 225 |
| Acceptance Rate |
81% |
| 2019 | |
|---|---|
| Scimago H-index |
6 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,139 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Psychology (miscellaneous) Q4 |
| Scopus Cite Score |
24/103=0,2 |
| Scopus Cite Score Rank |
General Psychology 192/204 (Q4) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,113 |
| Scopus Cites |
35 |
| Scopus Documents |
14 |
| Acceptance Rate |
58% |
| Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle | |
|---|---|
| Publication Model | Hybrid |
| Submission Fee | none |
| Article Processing Charge | 900 EUR/article |
| Printed Color Illustrations | 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece |
| Regional discounts on country of the funding agency | World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50% World Bank Low-income economies: 100% |
| Further Discounts | Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50% Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100% |
| Subscription fee 2023 | Online subsscription: 164 EUR / 220 USD Print + online subscription: 196 EUR / 250 USD |
| Subscription Information | Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content. |
| Purchase per Title | Individual articles are sold on the displayed price. |
| Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle | |
|---|---|
| Language | Hungarian |
| Size | B5 |
| Year of Foundation |
1928 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
4 |
| Founder | Magyar Pszichológiai Társaság |
| Founder's Address |
H-1075 Budapest, Hungary Kazinczy u. 23-27. I/116. |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 0025-0279 (Print) |
| ISSN | 1588-2799 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2022 | 0 | 25 | 26 |
| Jan 2023 | 0 | 16 | 18 |
| Feb 2023 | 0 | 24 | 29 |
| Mar 2023 | 0 | 33 | 41 |
| Apr 2023 | 0 | 76 | 68 |
| May 2023 | 0 | 36 | 53 |
| Jun 2023 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory