Authors:
and
Anita Lencsés
alencses@cogsci.bme.hu
Anita Lencsés
Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem, Kognitív Tudományi Tanszék
Search for other papers by Anita Lencsés in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anita Lencsés in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Gyula Demeter
Gyula Demeter
Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem, Kognitív Tudományi Tanszék
Országos Orvosi Rehabilitációs Intézet Agysérültek Rehabilitációs Osztálya
Search for other papers by Gyula Demeter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Országos Orvosi Rehabilitációs Intézet Agysérültek Rehabilitációs Osztálya
Search for other papers by Gyula Demeter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Jelen tanulmány tudomásunk szerint az első magyar nyelvű áttekintés a prospektív emlékezet (prospective memory, PM) témájában, melynek kettős célja van. Egyrészt összefoglalja a PM legfontosabb fogalmait, elméleteit, kísérleti és idegtudományi eredményeit, ismertetve a kutatások klinikai relevanciáját. A PM a jövőbeli szándékokra irányuló emlékezet, egy olyan összetett kognitív képesség, amely alapvető a mindennapi feladataink ellátása során. Működése a prefrontális kéreghez és kapcsolataihoz köthető, így számos, a frontostriatális rendszert érintő kórkép esetén sérülést mutat. Áttekintésünk fókuszában egy gyakori neurológiai kórkép, a traumás agysérülés áll. E személyek hétköznapjait a leginkább megnehezítő, gyakori és tartós kognitív zavar a PM sérülése. Ennek ellenére kevés kutatás foglalkozott a csökkent PM-működést meghatározó tényezőkkel ebben a betegcsoportban, az eredmények pedig ellentmondásosak.
Tanulmányunk további célja, hogy összefoglalja a traumás agysérült személyek PM-teljesítményével kapcsolatos empirikus kutatásokat. Szakirodalmi áttekintésünkben 25 empirikus tanulmányt azonosítottunk, amelyekben traumás agysérült felnőtt személyek PM-teljesítményét hasonlították össze egészséges kontrollszemélyekével. Az eredmények alapján megállapítható, hogy traumás agysérülést követően jellemző a PM diszfunkciója. Azonban számtalan tényező befolyásolhatja a PM-teljesítményt ebben a populációban: a sérülés súlyossága, lokalizációja, a kómában és a poszttraumás amnéziában töltött idő, a sérülés óta eltelt idő, a hangulatzavarok és a komorbid kognitív zavarok; valamint az olyan feladatjellemzők, mint a mérőeszköz típusa, a PM összetevői, illetve a prospektív kulcsinger és a folyamatban lévő feladat jellegzetességei. Elgondolásunk szerint e kutatási eredmények nemcsak a PM működésének megértésével kapcsolatban szolgálnak fontos következtetésekkel, hanem támpontokat adhatnak a rehabilitációs, terápiás munkára nézve is, megteremtve egy jövőbeli hatékony, a PM-funkciókra fókuszáló kognitív tréning kidolgozását traumás agysérült személyek számára.
To the best of our knowledge, the present paper is the fi rst review in Hungarian on the topic of prospective memory (PM), and it has a dual objective. On the one hand, it summarizes the most important concepts, theories, experimental and neuroscientifi c results of PM, describing the clinical relevance of the research. PM refers to the memory for future intentions, and it is a complex cognitive ability that is essential in performing our day-to-day tasks. PM function is related to the prefrontal cortex and its connections, and its dysfunction is well-documented in several diseases affecting the frontostriatal system. This review focuses on traumatic brain injury, a common neurological disorder. Patients with traumatic brain injury experience PM dysfunction, which is a common and persistent cognitive disorder making their everyday life the most diffi cult. Nevertheless, little research has investigated the factors contributing to decreased PM performance in this patient population, and the results are contradictory.
Another goal of our study is to summarize empirical research on PM performance after traumatic brain injury. In this literature review, we identifi ed 25 empirical studies comparing the PM performance of adults with traumatic brain injury with those of healthy controls. Based on these empirical results, PM dysfunction is a common fi nding after traumatic brain injury. However, a number of factors can affect PM performance in this population: the severity and localization of injury, time spent in coma, length of posttraumatic amnesia, time since injury, mood disorders and comorbid cognitive disorders, and task characteristics, such as the type of measurement, the components of the PM task, and features of the PM cue and the ongoing task. In our opinion, these fi ndings not only provide essential conclusions about understanding the functioning of PM, but they can also establish the foundation for rehabilitation and therapeutic work, and contribute to the creation of an effective cognitive training focused on PM for traumatic brain injury patients.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
Altgassen, M., Kliegel, M., & Martin, M. (2009).Event-based prospective memory in depression: The impact of cue focality.Cognition and Emotion, 23(6), 1041–1055.
-
Altgassen, M., Williams, T. I., Bölte, S., & Kliegel, M. (2009).Time-based prospective memory in children with autism spectrum disorder.Brain Impairment, 10(1), 52–58.
-
*Banville, F., & Nolin, P. (2012).Using virtual reality to assess prospective memory and executive functions after traumatic brain injury.Journal of CyberTherapy and Rehabilitation, 5(1), 45–55.
-
Bishara, S. N., Partridge, F. M., Godfrey, H. P., & Knight, R. G. (1992).Post-traumatic amnesia and Glasgow Coma Scale related to outcome in survivors in a consecutive series of patients with severe closed-head injury.Brain Injury, 6(4), 373–380.
-
Bravin, J. H., Kinsella, G. J., Ong, B., & Vowels, L. (2000 ). A study of performance of de layed intentions in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22(3), 418–429.
-
Brooks, D. N., Aughton, M. E., Bond, M. R., Jones, P., & Rizvi, S. (1980). Cognitive sequelae in relationship to early indices of severity of brain damage after severe blunt head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 43(6), 529–534.
-
Burgess, P. W. (1997). Theory and methodology in executive function research. In Rabbit, P. (Ed), Methodology of frontal and executive function (pp. 81–116). Hove: Psychology Press.
-
Burgess, P. W., Quayle, A., & Frith, C. D. (2001).Brain regions involved in prospective memory as determined by positron emission tomography.Neuropsychologia, 39(6), 545–555.
-
Burgess, P. W., Dumontheil, I., & Gilbert, S. J. (2007 ). The gateway hypothesis of rostral pre-frontal cortex (area 10) function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(7), 290–298.
-
Burgess, P. W., Gonen-Yaacovi, G., & Volle, E. (2011).Functional neuroimaging studies of prospec tive memory: what have we learnt so far? Neuropsychologia, 49(8), 2246–2257.
-
*Canty, A.L., Fleming, J., Patterson, F., Green, H. J., Man, D., & Shum, D. H. (2014). Evaluation of a virtual reality prospective memory task for use with individuals with severe traumatic brain injury.Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(2), 238–265.
-
*Carlesimo, G. A., Casadio, P., & Caltagirone, C. (2004). Prospective and retrospective components in the memory for actions to be performed in patients with severe closed-head injury.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10(5), 679–688.
-
*Carlesimo, G.A., Formisano, R., Bivona, U., Barba, L., & Caltagirone, C. (2010).Prospective memory in patients with severe closed-head injury: Role of concurrent activity and encoding instructions.Behavioural Neurology, 22(3–4), 101–110.
-
Chau, L. T., Lee, J. B., Fleming, J., Roche, N., & Shum, D. (2007).Reliability and normative data for the Comprehensive Assessment of Prospective Memory (CAPM).Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 17(6), 707–722.
-
Chen, N. Y. C., & Batchelor, J. (2019).Length of post-traumatic amnesia and its prediction of neuropsychological outcome following severe to extremely severe traumatic brain injury in a litigating sample.Brain Injury, 33(8), 1087–1096.
-
Clark-Foos, A., Brewer, G. A., Marsh, R. L., Meeks, J. T., & Cook, G. I. (2009 ). The valence of event-based prospective memory cues or the context in which they occur affects their detection. The American Journal of Psychology, 122(1), 89–97.
-
*Clune-Ryberg, M., Blanco-Campal, A., Carton, S., Pender, N., O’Brien, D., Phillips, J., et al (2011). The contribution of retrospective memory,attention and executive functions to the prospective and retrospective components of prospective memory following TBI.Brain Injury, 25(9), 819–831.
-
Cona, G., Scarpazza, C., Sartori, G., Moscovitch, M., & Bisiacchi, P. S. (2015).Neural bases of prospective memory: a meta-analysis and the “Attention to Delayed Intention” (AtoDI) model.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 52, 21–37.
-
Cona, G., & Rothen, N. (2019). Neuropsychological and physiological correlates of prospective memory. In Rummel, J., & McDaniel, M. A. (Eds), Prospective memory (pp. 95–115). Routledge.
-
Costa, A., Peppe, A., Caltagirone, C., & Carlesimo, G. A. (2008).Prospective memory impairment in individuals with Parkinson’s disease.Neuropsychology, 22(3), 283.
-
Crawford, J., Smith, G., Maylor, E., Della Sala, S., & Logie, R. (2003 ). The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Memory, 11(3), 261–275.
-
Crowe, S. F. (2008). The behavioural and emotional complications of traumatic brain injury. Psychology Press.
-
Ellis, J. A., & Freeman, J. E. (2008). Ten years on: Realizing delayed intentions. In Kliegel, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (Eds), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
-
Fleming, J. M., Shum, D., Strong, J., & Lightbody, S. (2005).Prospective memory rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury: A compensatory training programme.Brain Injury, 19(1), 1–10.
-
Haslam, C., Batchelor, J., Fearnside, M. R., Haslam, S. A., Hawkins, S., & Kenway, E. (1994).Post-coma disturbance and post-traumatic amnesia as nonlinear predictors of cognitive outcome following severe closed head injury: fi ndings from the Westmead Head Injury Project.Brain Injury, 8(6), 519–528.
-
*Henry, J. D., Phillips, L. H., Crawford, J.R., Kliegel, M., Theodorou, G., & Summers, F. (2007). Traumatic brain injury and prospective memory: Infl uence of task complexity.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29(5), 457–466.
-
Henry, J. D., Rendell, P. G., Kliegel, M., & Altgassen, M. (2007).Prospective memory in schizophre nia: Primary or secondary impairment? Schizophrenia Research, 95(1–3), 179–185.
-
Iverson, G. L. (2005).Outcome from mild traumatic brain injury.Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 18(3), 301–317.
-
Jeong, J. M., & Cranney, J. (2009).Motivation, depression, and naturalistic time-based prospective remembering. Memory, 17(7), 732–741.
-
Jones, S., Livner, Å., & Bäckman, L. (2006).Patterns of prospective and retrospective memory impairment in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease.Neuropsychology, 20(2), 144.
-
Kerns, K. A., & Price, K. J. (2001).An investigation of prospective memory in children with ADHD.Child Neuropsychology, 7(3), 162–171.
-
*Kinch, J., & McDonald, S. (2001). Traumatic brain injury and prospective memory: An examination of the infl uences of executive functioning and retrospective memory.Brain Impairment, 2(2), 119–130.
-
*Kinsella, G. J., Ong, B., & Tucker, J. (2009). Traumatic brain injury and prospective memory in a virtual shopping trip task: Does it matter who generates the prospective memory target? Brain Impairment, 10(1), 45–51.
-
Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2002).Complex prospective memory and executive control of working memory: A process model.Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 44(2), 303.
-
Kliegel, M., Jager, T., Altgassen, M., Shum, D. (2012). Clinical Neuropsychology of Prospective Memory. In Kliegel, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (Eds), Prospective memory: Cogni-tive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 283–308).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
-
*Knight, R. G., Harnett, M., & Titov, N.(2005). The effects of traumatic brain injury on the predicted and actual performance of a test of prospective remembering. Brain Injury, 19(1), 19–27.
-
*Knight, R. G., Titov, N., & Crawford, M. (2006). The effects of distraction on prospective remembering following traumatic brain injury assessed in a simulated naturalistic environment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(1), 8–16.
-
Kvavilashvili, L. (1987).Remembering intention as a distinct form of memory.British Journal of Psychology, 78(4), 507–518.
-
Kvavilashvili, L. (1992).Remembering intentions: A critical review of existing experimental paradigms.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6(6), 507–524.
-
Kvavilashvili, L., & Ellis, J. (1996). Varieties of intention: Some distinctions and classifi cations. In Brandimonte, M., Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (Eds), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 23–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
-
*Lajeunesse, A., Potvin, M. J., Audy, J., Paradis, V., Giguère, J. F., & Rouleau, I.(2019). Prospective memory assessment in acute mild traumatic brain injury.The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(7), 1175–1194.
-
Levin, H. S. & Krauss, M. F. (1994 ). The frontal lobes and traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuro psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 6, 433–454.
-
Levin, H. S., Hanten, G. (2004). Posttraumatic Amnesia and Residual Memory Defi cit after Closed Head Injury. In Baddeley, A. D., Kopelman, M., & Wilson, B. A. (Eds), The essential handbook of memory disorders for clinicians (pp. 37–67). John Wiley & Sons.
-
Marshman, L. A., Jakabek, D., Hennessy, M., Quirk, F., & Guazzo, E. P. (2013).Post-traumatic amnesia.Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 20(11), 1475–1481.
-
Martin, M., Kliegel, M., & McDaniel, M. A. (2003 ). The involvement of executive functions in prospective memory performance of adults. International Journal of Psychology, 38(4), 195–206.
-
*Mathias, J. L., & Mansfi eld, K. M. (2005). Prospective and declarative memory problems following moderate and severe traumatic brain injury.Brain Injury, 19(4), 271–282.
-
*Maujean, A., Shum, D., & McQueen, R. (2003). Effect of cognitive demand on prospective memory in individuals with traumatic brain injury.Brain Impairment, 4(2), 135–145.
-
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000).Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework.Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Offi cial Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 14(7), 127–144.
-
McDonald-Miszczak, L., Gould, O. N., & Tychynski, D. (1999).Metamemory predictors of prospective and retrospective memory performance.The Journal of General Psychology, 126(1), 37–52.
-
Meacham, J. A., & Dumitru, J. (1976). Prospective remembering and external retrieval cues. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6(65), Ms. No. 1284.
-
Meacham, J. A., & Singer, J. (1977).Incentive effects in prospective remembering.The Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 191–197.
-
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001).An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 167–202.
-
*Mioni, G., Stablum, F., McClintock, S. M., & Cantagallo, A. (2012). Time-based prospective memory in severe traumatic brain injury patients: The involvement of executive functions and time perception.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18(4), 697–705. Gyula
-
*Mioni, G., Rendell, P. G., Henry, J., Cantagallo, A., & Stablum, F. (2013). An investigation of prospective memory functions in people with traumatic brain injury using Virtual Week.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(6), 617–630.
-
*Mioni, G., Rendell, P. G., Terrett, G., & Stablum, F. (2015). Prospective memory performance in traumatic brain injury patients: a study of implementation intentions.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 21(4), 305–313.
-
*Mioni, G., Bertucci, E., Rosato, A., Terrett, G., Rendell, P. G., Zamuner, M., & Stablum, F. (2017). Improving prospective memory performance with future event simulation in traumatic brain injury patients.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(2), 130–148.
-
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000 ). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100.
-
*O’Brien, K. H., & Kennedy, M. R. (2018). Predicting Remembering: Judgments of Prospective Memory After Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(6), 1393–1408.
-
Okuda, J., Fujii, T., Ohtake, H., Tsukiura, T., Yamadori, A., Frith, C. D., & Burgess, P. W. (2007).Differential involvement of regions of rostral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 10) in time-and event-based prospective memory.International Journal of Psychophysiology, 64(3), 233–246.
-
*Palermo, L., Cinelli, M. C., Piccardi, L., De Felice, S., Ciurli, P., Incoccia, C., et al (2020). Cognitive functions underlying prospective memory defi cits: A study on traumatic brain injury.Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 27(2), 158–172.
-
*Pavawalla, S. P., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., & Smith, R. E. (2012). Prospective memory after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: A multinomial modeling approach. Neuropsychology, 26(1), 91.
-
*Potvin, M. J., Rouleau, I., Audy, J., Charbonneau, S., & Giguère, J. F. (2011). Ecological prospective memory assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury.Brain Injury, 25(2), 192–205.
-
Rabbitt, P. (Ed.) (2004). Methodology of frontal and executive function. Psychology Press.
-
Racsmány, M., & Kónya, A. (1998). A Rivermead Viselkedéses Memória Teszt Magyar Változat. Thames Valley Test Company.
-
Racsmány, M., Demeter, G., Csigó, K., Harsányi, A., & Németh, A. (2011).An experimental study of prospective memory in obsessive-compulsive disorder.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(1), 85–91.
-
Raskin, S. A. (2004 ). The Memory for Intentions Screening Test. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10(1), 110.
-
*Raskin, S. A., Shum, D. H. K., Ellis, J., Pereira, A., & Mills, G. (2017). A comparison of laboratory, clinical, and self-report measures of prospective memory in healthy adults and individuals with brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 40(5), 423–436.
-
Raskin, S. A., Williams, J., & Aiken, E. M. (2018). A review of prospective memory in individuals with acquired brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(5), 891–921.
-
Rehel, S., Legrand, N., Lecouvey, G., Laniepce, A., Bertran, F., Fleury, P., et al (2019).Effects of Sleep and Age on Prospective Memory Consolidation: A Walk in a Virtual Museum.Clocks & Sleep, 1(3), 332–351.
-
Rendell, P. G., Gray, T. J., Henry, J. D., & Tolan, A. (2007).Prospective memory impairment in “ecstasy”(MDMA) users.Psychopharmacology, 194(4), 497–504.
-
Rendell, P. G., & Henry, J. D. (2009 ). A review of Virtual Week for prospective memory assessment: Clinical implications. Brain Impairment, 10(1), 14–22.
-
Rose, N. S., Rendell, P. G., Hering, A., Kliegel, M., Bidelman, G. M., & Craik, F. I. (2015). Cognitive and neural plasticity in older adults’ prospective memory following training with the Virtual Week computer game. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 592.
-
Rude, S. S., Hertel, P. T., Jarrold, W., Covich, J., & Hedlund, S. (1999).Depression-related impairments in prospective memory.Cognition & Emotion, 13(3), 267–276.
-
Schretlen, D., & Shapiro, A. M. (2003 ). A quantitative review of the effects of traumatic brain injury on cognitive functioning. International Review of Psychiatry, 15, 341–349.
-
*Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., & Wright, M. J. (2004). Event-based prospective memory following severe closed-head injury.Neuropsychology, 18(2), 353.
-
Scullin, M. K., Bugg, J. M., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). Whoops, I did it again: Commission errors in prospective memory.Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 46.
-
*Shum, D., Valentine, M., & Cutmore, T. (1999). Performance of individuals with severe long-term traumatic brain injury on time-, event-, and activity-based prospective memory tasks. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21(1), 49–58.
-
Shum, D., Levin, H., & Chan, R. C. (2011).Prospective memory in patients with closed head injury: A review.Neuropsychologia, 49(8), 2156–2165.
-
Simons, J. S., Schölvinck, M. L., Gilbert, S. J., Frith, C. D., & Burgess, P. W. (2006). Differential components of prospective memory? Evidence from fMRI.Neuropsychologia, 44(8), 1388–1397
-
Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 347.
-
Smith, R. E. (2010). What costs do reveal and moving beyond cost: Reply to Einstein and McDaniel (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1089–1095.
-
Spiess, M. A., Meier, B., & Roebers, C. M. (2015).Prospective memory, executive functions, and metacognition are already differentiated in young elementary school children. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 74(4), 229–241.
-
*Tay, S. Y., Ang, B. T., Lau, X. Y., Meyyappan, A., & Collinson, S. L. (2010). Chronic impairment of prospective memory after mild traumatic brain injury.Journal of Neurotrauma, 27(1), 77–83.
-
Tagliaferri, F., Compagnone, C., Korsic, M., Servadei, F., & Kraus, J. J. A. N. (2006 ). A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe. Acta Neurochirurgica, 148(3), 255–268.
-
Wilson, B., Cockburn, J., & Baddeley, A. (1985). Manual for the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. London: Thames Valley Test Company, Suffolk, England.
-
Wilson, B. A. (2004). Management and Remediation of Memory Problems in Brain-injured Adults. In Baddeley, A. D., Kopelman, E. D., Wilson, B. A. (Eds), The Essential Handbook of Memory Disorders for Clinicians (pp. 199–226). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
-
Wilson, B. A., Emslie, H., Foley, J., Shiel, A., & Watson, P. H. K. (2005). The Cambridge Prospective Memory Test. London: Harcourt Assessment.
-
Wong Gonzalez, D., & Buchanan, L. (2019). A meta-analysis of task-related infl uences in prospective memory in traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 29(5), 657–671.
-
World Health Organization (2006). Neurological disorders: public health challenges. World Health Organization. Letöltve: 2020.12.03-án: www.who.int/mental_health/neurology/neurodiso/en/
Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle
ELTE PPK Pszichológiai Intézet
Address: H-1064 Budapest, Izabella u. 46.
E-mail: pszichoszemle@gmail.com
Indexing and Abstracting Services:
- PsycINFO
- Scopus
- CABELLS Journalytics
| 2022 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Total Cites WoS |
not indexed |
| Journal Impact Factor | not indexed |
| Rank by Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
not indexed |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Journal Citation Indicator | not indexed |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator |
not indexed |
| Scimago | |
| Scimago H-index |
8 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0.127 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Psychology (miscellaneous) (Q4) |
| Scopus | |
| Scopus Cite Score |
0,3 |
| Scopus CIte Score Rank |
General Psychology 199/209 (5th PCTL) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0.124 |
| 2021 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Total Cites WoS |
not indexed |
| Journal Impact Factor | not indexed |
| Rank by Impact Factor | not indexed |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
not indexed |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Journal Citation Indicator | not indexed |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator | not indexed |
| Scimago | |
| Scimago H-index |
8 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,117 |
| Scimago Quartile Score | Psychology (miscellaneous) (Q4) |
| Scopus | |
| Scopus Cite Score |
0,3 |
| Scopus CIte Score Rank |
General Psychology 200/209 (Q4) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,366 |
| 2020 | |
|---|---|
| Scimago H-index |
7 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,142 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Psychology (miscellaneous) Q4 |
| Scopus Cite Score |
17/111=0,2 |
| Scopus Cite Score Rank |
General Psychology 199/203 (Q4) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,079 |
| Scopus Cites |
53 |
| Scopus Documents |
24 |
| Days from submission to acceptance | 116 |
| Days from acceptance to publication | 225 |
| Acceptance Rate |
81% |
| 2019 | |
|---|---|
| Scimago H-index |
6 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,139 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Psychology (miscellaneous) Q4 |
| Scopus Cite Score |
24/103=0,2 |
| Scopus Cite Score Rank |
General Psychology 192/204 (Q4) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,113 |
| Scopus Cites |
35 |
| Scopus Documents |
14 |
| Acceptance Rate |
58% |
| Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle | |
|---|---|
| Publication Model | Hybrid |
| Submission Fee | none |
| Article Processing Charge | 900 EUR/article |
| Printed Color Illustrations | 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece |
| Regional discounts on country of the funding agency | World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50% World Bank Low-income economies: 100% |
| Further Discounts | Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50% Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100% |
| Subscription fee 2023 | Online subsscription: 164 EUR / 220 USD Print + online subscription: 196 EUR / 250 USD |
| Subscription Information | Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content. |
| Purchase per Title | Individual articles are sold on the displayed price. |
| Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle | |
|---|---|
| Language | Hungarian |
| Size | B5 |
| Year of Foundation |
1928 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
4 |
| Founder | Magyar Pszichológiai Társaság |
| Founder's Address |
H-1075 Budapest, Hungary Kazinczy u. 23-27. I/116. |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 0025-0279 (Print) |
| ISSN | 1588-2799 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2023 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Jul 2023 | 0 | 5 | 14 |
| Aug 2023 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| Sep 2023 | 0 | 10 | 18 |
| Oct 2023 | 0 | 11 | 15 |
| Nov 2023 | 0 | 38 | 31 |
| Dec 2023 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Author:
Author:
Authors:
, , , , , and
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory