Author: Vanda Lamm 1
View More View Less
  • 1 Institute for Legal Studies, HAS H-1014 Budapest Országház u. 30 Hungary
Full access

The article aims to assess the effectiveness of the non-proliferation regime established more than 40 years ago with the adoption of the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Since that time the international community had achieved considerable success in the prevention of nuclear weapons’ proliferation. Nevertheless, while noting the results of the NPT and the verification system established under that instrument, one cannot remain silent about the shortcomings of the system and the non-compliance with some of its provisions. By its structure and provisions the NPT has divided States into two groups, distinguishing those possessing and those not possessing nuclear weapons. In effect, the rights and obligations of the Contracting Parties to the NPT are tailored to the group to which they belong, and the gravest violation of the NPT is that when States seek to change their status as defined in the NPT, notably by trying to munfacture or control of nuclear weapons. Under the NPT, research in, production and application of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes are inalienable rights, but their exercise should be in keeping with the basic obligation of nonnuclear-weapon States under the Treaty not to acquire in any form nuclear weapons and not to carry out unauthorized nuclear activities under the guise of their peaceful nuclear programs. While emphasizing the need to strengthen the non-proliferation regime, the article describes in nutshell the nuclear program of two States (the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea) which gave cause for serious international concern.

The author instruction is available in PDF.

Please, download the file from HERE

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Éva Jakab

Viktor Lőrincz,
Fruzsina Orosz

Samanatha Cheesman,
Zsuzsa Fejes,
Attila Kun,
Gábor Sulyok,
Márton Varju

Editorial Board

      Attila Badó
      Myátyás Bódig (Aberdeen)
      Zoltán Csehi
      Péter Cserne (Hull)
      Balázs Gellér
      András Jakab
      Miklós Király
      György Kiss
      Jan Kudrna (Praha)
      Herbert Küpper (Regensburg)
      Konrad Lachmayer (Durham)
      Andzrej Stanisław Mączyński (Kraków)
      Guido Pfeifer (Frankfurt am Main)
      Miklós Szabó
      Zoltán Szente
      G.J.J. Heerma van Voss (Leiden)
      Bernd Waas (Frankfurt am Main)
      Fryderyk Zoll (Osnabrück)

Advisory Board

      Péter Erdő
      Gábor Hamza
      Attila Harmathy
      László Kecskés
      Tibor Király
      László Korinek
      László Sólyom
      Lajos Vékás
      Imre Vörös

Acta Juridica Hungarica
P.O. Box 25
HU–1250 Budapest,Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 355 7384
Fax. (36 1) 375 7858

  Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Information technology and the Law
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • Worldwide Political Science Abstractss
  • Translation Studies Abstracts
  • Cabell's Directories
  • HeinOnline


Acta Juridica Hungarica
Language English
Year of
changed title
per Year
per Year
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1216-2574 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2616 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
May 2021 0 1 0
Jun 2021 0 3 0
Jul 2021 0 3 1
Aug 2021 0 11 0
Sep 2021 0 2 0
Oct 2021 0 0 0
Nov 2021 0 0 0