View More View Less
  • 1 Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre for Social Sciences
  • | 2 University of Miskolc
Full access

Inserting citations to authorities into a text, in order to increase the persuasive power of it, and prove the competence of the author, has a long tradition in science and in law. The question is whether this also applies to judicial decisions. This question is especially interesting in a continental legal culture, where following previous cases is not obligatory, there is no stare decisis, and therefore, inserting a reference to a previous case may have a different function. In 2012 we performed a computer-based citation analysis of the court decisions published under FOI act on the official website of the National Office for the Judiciary (Országos Bírósági Hivatal). The article contains four sections. The first and the second sections are dealing with citations within judicial decisions in general, and their significance in different legal cultures. The third section is about the quantitative, while the fourth is about the qualitative part of the research, and tackle the issue whether citations increase the quality of judicial reasoning or not. The answer will be limited to the Hungarian legal culture.

  • Austin, J. M., ‘The Law of Citations and Seriatim Opinions: Were the Ancient Romans and the Early Supreme Court on the Right Track?’ (2010) 31 Northern Illinois University Law Review 1936.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bast, C. M., ‘What’s in a Name? Shepard’s Citators’ (1998) 14 Journal of Paralegal Education and Practice 4158.

  • Beniger, J. R., The Control Revolution (Harvard University Press 1986).

  • Cross, F. B., Spriggs II, J. F., Timothy, R. J. and Wahlbeck, P. J., ‘Citations in the U.S Supreme Court: An Empirical Study of their Use, and Significance 2010’ (2010) University of Illinois Law Review 489576.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Friedman, L. M., Kagan, R. A., Cartwright, B. and Wheeler, S., ‘State Supreme Courts: A Century of Style and Citation’ (1981) 33 Stanford Law Review 773818.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garfield, E., ‘Citation Indexes to Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas’ (1955) 122 Science 108111.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goutal, J. L., ‘Characteristics of Judicial Style in France, Britain and the U.S.A.’ (1976) 24 American Journal of Comparative Law (1976) 4372.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnson, C. A., ‘Citations to Authority in Supreme Court Opinions’ (1985) 7 Law & Policy 509523.

  • Landes, W. A. and Posner, R. A., ‘Legal Precendent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis’ (1976) 19 Journal of Law&Economy 249308.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCormick, P., ‘Judicial Citation, the Supreme Court of Canada and the Lower Courts: The Case of Alberta’ (1996) 34 Alberta Law Review 870891.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merryman, J. H., ‘The Authority of Authority: What the California Supreme Court Cited in 1950’ (19531954) 6 Stanford Law Review 613673.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merryman, J. H., ‘Toward a Theory of Citations: An Emprical Study of the Citation Practice of the California Supreme Court in 1950, 1960, and 1970.’ (19771978) 50 Southern California Law Review 381396.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smyth R. , ‘An Empirical Study of Citation Practice in the New Zeeland Court of Appeal’ (2000) 31 Victoria University Wellington Law Review 847895.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wagner-Döbler, R. and Lothar, P., ‘Präjudizien in der Rechtsprechung: Statistische Untersuchungenanhand der Zitierpraxisdeutscher Gerichte’ (1992) 23 Rechtsteorie 228242.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Watson, A., Law out of Context (University of Georgia Press 2000).

  • West, J. B. ‘The Multiplicity of Reports’ (19091910) 2 Law Library Journal 1545.

The author instruction is available in PDF.

Please, download the file from HERE

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Éva Jakab

Co-Editor(s):
Viktor Lőrincz,
Fruzsina Orosz

Editor(s):
Samanatha Cheesman,
Zsuzsa Fejes,
Attila Kun,
Gábor Sulyok,
Márton Varju

Editorial Board

    1. Attila Badó
    1. Myátyás Bódig (Aberdeen)
    1. Zoltán Csehi
    1. Péter Cserne (Hull)
    1. Balázs Gellér
    1. András Jakab
    1. Miklós Király
    1. György Kiss
    1. Jan Kudrna (Praha)
    1. Herbert Küpper (Regensburg)
    1. Konrad Lachmayer (Durham)
    1. Andzrej Stanisław Mączyński (Kraków)
    1. Guido Pfeifer (Frankfurt am Main)
    1. Miklós Szabó
    1. Zoltán Szente
    1. G.J.J. Heerma van Voss (Leiden)
    1. Bernd Waas (Frankfurt am Main)
    1. Fryderyk Zoll (Osnabrück)

Advisory Board

    1. Péter Erdő
    1. Gábor Hamza
    1. Attila Harmathy
    1. László Kecskés
    1. Tibor Király
    1. László Korinek
    1. László Sólyom
    1. Lajos Vékás
    1. Imre Vörös

Acta Juridica Hungarica
P.O. Box 25
HU–1250 Budapest,Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 355 7384
Fax. (36 1) 375 7858
E-mail: acta.juridica@tk.mta.hu

  Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Information technology and the Law
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • Worldwide Political Science Abstractss
  • Translation Studies Abstracts
  • SCOPUS
  • Cabell's Directories
  • HeinOnline

 

Acta Juridica Hungarica
Language English
Size  
Year of
Foundation
1959
Publication
Programme
changed title
Volumes
per Year
 
Issues
per Year
 
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1216-2574 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2616 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Jun 2021 0 5 3
Jul 2021 0 0 0
Aug 2021 0 4 5
Sep 2021 0 1 1
Oct 2021 0 6 2
Nov 2021 0 3 4
Dec 2021 0 0 1