Author:
Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto

Search for other papers by Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Business entities see arbitration as a forum where they can settle their disputes. This form of alternative dispute resolution provides a win-win situation for both parties involved in the debate. Arbitration is the only institution that has full authority to settle their disputes once parties entered into a consent to choose an arbitration committee over a classic judicial forum. Even though arbitral awards have a final and binding character, they may be challenged using two legal methods: refusal or annulment. Besides providing specific grounds of refusal, the New York Convention 1958 ruled that the annulment of a foreign arbitral award could be done by a “competent authority of the country in which, or under the law of which, the award was made”. Although Indonesia has ratified the Convention and has specific national regulations on arbitration, judges of the courts of the first and second instance in fact do not have sufficient understanding of the refusal and annulment grounds of foreign arbitral awards. The well-known case of Karaha Bodas Company v. Pertamina shows that judges of the District Court of Central Jakarta failed to exercise their jurisdiction to annul the Geneva arbitral award. The case is a very typical example of not thinking outside the box and disregarding international treaties that sadly seems to be a commonly followed ‘habit’ in many cases all over the world. This paper aims to criticize several mistakes in the judicial reasoning that lead to such outcomes in judicial practice. Moreover, this paper will explain ways to strengthen judges’ ability to understand the international treaties ratified by their government, as their usual practice in the civil law system is to constantly rely on the hierarchy of national legislation.

  • Agusman, D. , Hukum Perjanjian Internasional: Kajian Teori dan Praktik Indonesia (Refika Aditama 2010).

  • Budidjaja, T. , Public Policy as Grounds for Refusal of Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Indonesia (PT. Tatanusa 2002).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Department Review of Court Decision International, ‘Effect of Award Annulled by a Country Lacking Primary Jurisdiction’ (2003) 59 JUL Journal of Dispute Resolution 9091.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drahozal, C. R. , ‘Enforcing Vacated International Arbitral Awards: An Economic Approach’ (2000) 11 American Review of International Arbitration 451479.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hikmah, M. , ‘The Roles of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia in Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards in Indonesia’ (2013) 3 Indonesia Law Review 238266.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hunter, H. and Martin, J., ‘The UNCITRAL Model Law’ (1985) 13 International Business Lawyer 399402.

  • Hwang, M. , et.al, ‘Survey of South East Asian Nations on the Application of the New York Convention’ (2008) 25 Journal of International Arbitration 873892.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Juwana, H. , ‘Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional oleh Pengadilan Nasional’ (2002) 21 Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 6774.

  • Longdong, T. L. T. , Asas Ketertiban Umum & Konvensi New York 1958 (PT. Citra Aditya Bakti 1998).

  • Mills, K. , ‘Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Indonesia’ (2000) 6 International Arbitration Law Review 192194.

  • Peradilan, V. , ‘Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Digugat Pembatalannya: Kasus Pertamina v. Karaha Bodas’ (2005) 20 Majalah Hukum Tahun 427.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rajagukguk, E. , ‘Economic Law: Legal Reform in Indonesia’ in RM Talib Puspokusumo (ed), Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia: Sebuah Keniscayaan (Tim Pakar Hukum Departemen Kehakiman dan HAM RI 2000).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rubins, N. , ‘The Enforcement and Annulment of International Arbitral Awards in Indonesia’ (2005) 20 American University International Law Review 359401.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Slate, W. K. , ‘International Arbitration: Do Institutions Make a Difference?’ (2004) 31 Wake Forest Law Review 4164.

  • Soemartomo, G. P. , Arbitrase dan Mediasi di Indonesia (Gramedia Pustaka Utama 2006).

  • Collapse
  • Expand

The author instruction is available in PDF.

Please, download the file from HERE

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Éva Jakab

Co-Editor(s):
Viktor Lőrincz,
Fruzsina Orosz

Editor(s):
Samanatha Cheesman,
Zsuzsa Fejes,
Attila Kun,
Gábor Sulyok,
Márton Varju

Editorial Board

    1. Attila Badó
    1. Myátyás Bódig (Aberdeen)
    1. Zoltán Csehi
    1. Péter Cserne (Hull)
    1. Balázs Gellér
    1. András Jakab
    1. Miklós Király
    1. György Kiss
    1. Jan Kudrna (Praha)
    1. Herbert Küpper (Regensburg)
    1. Konrad Lachmayer (Durham)
    1. Andzrej Stanisław Mączyński (Kraków)
    1. Guido Pfeifer (Frankfurt am Main)
    1. Miklós Szabó
    1. Zoltán Szente
    1. G.J.J. Heerma van Voss (Leiden)
    1. Bernd Waas (Frankfurt am Main)
    1. Fryderyk Zoll (Osnabrück)

Advisory Board

    1. Péter Erdő
    1. Gábor Hamza
    1. Attila Harmathy
    1. László Kecskés
    1. Tibor Király
    1. László Korinek
    1. László Sólyom
    1. Lajos Vékás
    1. Imre Vörös

Acta Juridica Hungarica
P.O. Box 25
HU–1250 Budapest,Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 355 7384
Fax. (36 1) 375 7858
E-mail: acta.juridica@tk.mta.hu

  Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Information technology and the Law
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • Worldwide Political Science Abstractss
  • Translation Studies Abstracts
  • SCOPUS
  • Cabell's Directories
  • HeinOnline

 

Acta Juridica Hungarica
Language English
Size  
Year of
Foundation
1959
Publication
Programme
changed title
Volumes
per Year
 
Issues
per Year
 
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1216-2574 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2616 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Jun 2022 0 4 6
Jul 2022 0 7 1
Aug 2022 0 5 2
Sep 2022 0 5 8
Oct 2022 0 9 7
Nov 2022 0 12 12
Dec 2022 0 0 2