Author:
András Molnár University of Szeged and Law Clerk, Hungarian Constitutional Court

Search for other papers by András Molnár in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

The Lochner era has much to say about conceptions of judicial role and judicial activism, and can be used as an analytical example. I examine the era from the aspect of judicial reasoning. The analysis is composed of three main units. First, I point out a distinction between judicial and constitutional, as well as between single activist decisions and tendencies. Second, I sketch a theoretical framework that concerns the inclusion of social sciences into judicial reasoning. “Social scientific passivistic” reasoning features references to exact data from social sciences, and tends to uphold the legislative action in question. On the other hand, “social scientific activistic” reasoning refers to social scientific data and aims to strike down the legislative action in question. In a similar vein, “dogmatic activistic” reasoning is grounded on precedents and methods of legal interpretation, tending to strike down a legislative act, while “dogmatic passivistic” reasoning aims at upholding such an act. These categories are not mutually exclusive; however, they help to analyze constitutional decisions with directing attention to their nature behind their prima facie content. Finally, I apply the scheme to the Supreme Court’s Lochner era constitutional adjudication.

  • Bickel, A. , The Least Dangerous Branch (Yale University Press 1986).

  • Cassell, P. G. , ‘The Guilty and the “Innocent”: An Examination of Alleged Cases of Wrongful Convictions from False Confessions’ (1999) 22 HarvJL&PubPol’y 523603.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cox, A. , The Role of the Supreme Court in American Government (OUP 1976).

  • Easterbrook, F. H. , ‘Do Liberals and Conservatives Differ in Judicial Activism?’ (2002) 73 University of Colorado LRev 14011416.

  • Epstein, R. A. , ‘Substantive Due Process by Any Other Name: The Abortion Cases’ (1973) SupCtRev 159185.

  • Gillman, H. , The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence (Duke University Press 1993).

  • Hitchcock, S. T. , Roe v. Wade: Protecting a Woman’s Right to Choose (Chelsea House 2007).

  • Kmiec, K. D. , ‘The Origin and Current Meanings of “Judicial Activism”’ (2004) 92 CalLRev 14411478.

  • Leuchtenburg, W. E. , The Supreme Court Reborn (OUP 1995).

  • Lindquist, S. A. and Cross, F. B., Measuring Judicial Activism (OUP 2009).

  • Michael, H. K. , ‘The Role of Natural Law in Early American Constitutionalism: Did the Founders Contemplate Judicial Enforcement of “Unwritten” Individual Rights?’ (1991) 69 NCLRev 421490.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Phillips, M. J. , ‘The Substantive Due Process Decisions of Mr. Justice Holmes’ (1999) 36 AmBusLJ 439477.

  • Pokol, B. , ‘Höchstrichterliches Präjudizienrecht in Ungarn’ in E Balogh (ed), Ungarn auf der Schwelle in die EU: Herausforderungen und Aufgaben für Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Pólay ElemérAlapítvány 2006) 7383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Posner, R. A. , ‘The Decline of Law as an Autonomous Discipline’ (1987) 100 Harv L Rev 761780.

  • Posner, R. A. , ‘The Costs of Enforcing Legal Rights’ (1995) 4 EECR 7183.

  • Scalia, A. , ‘Originalism: The Lesser Evil’ (1989) 57 UCinLRev 849866.

  • Schauer, F. , ‘Precedent’ (1987) 39 StanLRev 571606.

  • Scheek, L. , ‘Constitutional Activism and Fundamental Rights in Europe: Common Interests through Transnational Socialisation’ < http://polilexes.com/POLILEXES/textesdirects_files/constitutional_activism.pdf > accessed 5 February 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sherry, S. , ‘The Founders’ Unwritten Constitution’ (1987) 54 UChiLRev 11271177.

  • Summers, R. S. and Taruffo, M., ‘Interpretation and Comparative Analysis’ in D McCormick and RS Summers (eds), Interpreting Statutes (Dartmouth Publishing 1991) 461510.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Swygert, L. M. , ‘In Defense of Judicial Activism’ (1982) 16 ValULRev 439458.

  • Takács, I. , ‘Az alkotmány és az alkotmányosság fogalma’ in I Kukorelli (ed), Alkotmánytan I (Osiris 2010) 2134.

  • Uitz, R. , ‘Constitutional Activism and Deference through Judicial Reasoning: Confirming an Indeterminacy Thesis’ (Juridica International, VII, 2002) < http://juridicainternational.eu/index.php?id=12577 > accessed 5 February 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warren, C. , ‘The Progressiveness of the United States Supreme Court’ (1913) 13 ColumLRev 294313.

  • Wolfe, C. , Judicial Activism (Roman & Littlefield 1997).

  • Wolfe, C. , The Rise of Modern Judicial Review. From Constitutional Interpretation to Judge-Made Law (Basic Books 1986).

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Éva Jakab

Co-Editor(s):
Viktor Lőrincz,
Fruzsina Orosz

Editor(s):
Samanatha Cheesman,
Zsuzsa Fejes,
Attila Kun,
Gábor Sulyok,
Márton Varju

Editorial Board

    1. Attila Badó
    1. Myátyás Bódig (Aberdeen)
    1. Zoltán Csehi
    1. Péter Cserne (Hull)
    1. Balázs Gellér
    1. András Jakab
    1. Miklós Király
    1. György Kiss
    1. Jan Kudrna (Praha)
    1. Herbert Küpper (Regensburg)
    1. Konrad Lachmayer (Durham)
    1. Andzrej Stanisław Mączyński (Kraków)
    1. Guido Pfeifer (Frankfurt am Main)
    1. Miklós Szabó
    1. Zoltán Szente
    1. G.J.J. Heerma van Voss (Leiden)
    1. Bernd Waas (Frankfurt am Main)
    1. Fryderyk Zoll (Osnabrück)

Advisory Board

    1. Péter Erdő
    1. Gábor Hamza
    1. Attila Harmathy
    1. László Kecskés
    1. Tibor Király
    1. László Korinek
    1. László Sólyom
    1. Lajos Vékás
    1. Imre Vörös

Acta Juridica Hungarica
P.O. Box 25
HU–1250 Budapest,Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 355 7384
Fax. (36 1) 375 7858
E-mail: acta.juridica@tk.mta.hu

  Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Information technology and the Law
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • Worldwide Political Science Abstractss
  • Translation Studies Abstracts
  • SCOPUS
  • Cabell's Directories
  • HeinOnline

 

Acta Juridica Hungarica
Language English
Size  
Year of
Foundation
1959
Publication
Programme
changed title
Volumes
per Year
 
Issues
per Year
 
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1216-2574 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2616 (Online)