The Lochner era has much to say about conceptions of judicial role and judicial activism, and can be used as an analytical example. I examine the era from the aspect of judicial reasoning. The analysis is composed of three main units. First, I point out a distinction between judicial and constitutional, as well as between single activist decisions and tendencies. Second, I sketch a theoretical framework that concerns the inclusion of social sciences into judicial reasoning. “Social scientific passivistic” reasoning features references to exact data from social sciences, and tends to uphold the legislative action in question. On the other hand, “social scientific activistic” reasoning refers to social scientific data and aims to strike down the legislative action in question. In a similar vein, “dogmatic activistic” reasoning is grounded on precedents and methods of legal interpretation, tending to strike down a legislative act, while “dogmatic passivistic” reasoning aims at upholding such an act. These categories are not mutually exclusive; however, they help to analyze constitutional decisions with directing attention to their nature behind their prima facie content. Finally, I apply the scheme to the Supreme Court’s Lochner era constitutional adjudication.
Bickel, A. , The Least Dangerous Branch (Yale University Press 1986).
Cassell, P. G. , ‘The Guilty and the “Innocent”: An Examination of Alleged Cases of Wrongful Convictions from False Confessions’ (1999) 22 HarvJL&PubPol’y 523–603.
Cox, A. , The Role of the Supreme Court in American Government (OUP 1976).
Easterbrook, F. H. , ‘Do Liberals and Conservatives Differ in Judicial Activism?’ (2002) 73 University of Colorado LRev 1401–1416.
Epstein, R. A. , ‘Substantive Due Process by Any Other Name: The Abortion Cases’ (1973) SupCtRev 159–185.
Gillman, H. , The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence (Duke University Press 1993).
Hitchcock, S. T. , Roe v. Wade: Protecting a Woman’s Right to Choose (Chelsea House 2007).
Kmiec, K. D. , ‘The Origin and Current Meanings of “Judicial Activism”’ (2004) 92 CalLRev 1441–1478.
Leuchtenburg, W. E. , The Supreme Court Reborn (OUP 1995).
Lindquist, S. A. and Cross, F. B., Measuring Judicial Activism (OUP 2009).
Michael, H. K. , ‘The Role of Natural Law in Early American Constitutionalism: Did the Founders Contemplate Judicial Enforcement of “Unwritten” Individual Rights?’ (1991) 69 NCLRev 421–490.
Phillips, M. J. , ‘The Substantive Due Process Decisions of Mr. Justice Holmes’ (1999) 36 AmBusLJ 439–477.
Pokol, B. , ‘Höchstrichterliches Präjudizienrecht in Ungarn’ in E Balogh (ed), Ungarn auf der Schwelle in die EU: Herausforderungen und Aufgaben für Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Pólay ElemérAlapítvány 2006) 73–83.
Posner, R. A. , ‘The Decline of Law as an Autonomous Discipline’ (1987) 100 Harv L Rev 761–780.
Posner, R. A. , ‘The Costs of Enforcing Legal Rights’ (1995) 4 EECR 71–83.
Scalia, A. , ‘Originalism: The Lesser Evil’ (1989) 57 UCinLRev 849–866.
Schauer, F. , ‘Precedent’ (1987) 39 StanLRev 571–606.
Scheek, L. , ‘Constitutional Activism and Fundamental Rights in Europe: Common Interests through Transnational Socialisation’ < http://polilexes.com/POLILEXES/textesdirects_files/constitutional_activism.pdf > accessed 5 February 2015.
Sherry, S. , ‘The Founders’ Unwritten Constitution’ (1987) 54 UChiLRev 1127–1177.
Summers, R. S. and Taruffo, M., ‘Interpretation and Comparative Analysis’ in D McCormick and RS Summers (eds), Interpreting Statutes (Dartmouth Publishing 1991) 461–510.
Swygert, L. M. , ‘In Defense of Judicial Activism’ (1982) 16 ValULRev 439–458.
Takács, I. , ‘Az alkotmány és az alkotmányosság fogalma’ in I Kukorelli (ed), Alkotmánytan I (Osiris 2010) 21–34.
Uitz, R. , ‘Constitutional Activism and Deference through Judicial Reasoning: Confirming an Indeterminacy Thesis’ (Juridica International, VII, 2002) < http://juridicainternational.eu/index.php?id=12577 > accessed 5 February 2015.
Warren, C. , ‘The Progressiveness of the United States Supreme Court’ (1913) 13 ColumLRev 294–313.
Wolfe, C. , Judicial Activism (Roman & Littlefield 1997).
Wolfe, C. , The Rise of Modern Judicial Review. From Constitutional Interpretation to Judge-Made Law (Basic Books 1986).