The article reports on some judgments of the European Court of Human Rights applying the principles of the European Convention on Human Rights in respect of trademarks. The first group of cases relates to the freedom of expression (Art 10). In the cases Tokaji, Marlboro and McDonald’s, the applicants referred to this principle to defend their actions related to the trademark. The second kind of cases relate to the protection of property (Protocol No. 1). In the case of Budweiser the European Court took the position in favor of applying this rule to a trademark application. The third group of cases relates to the right to a fair trial (Art. 6). According to reports on the Orient and McDonald’s cases, the national courts committed important procedural faults. The conclusion of the author is that trademark rights can be protected by means of human rights only in exceptional circumstances.
Beiter, K. D. , ‘The Right to Property and the Protection of Interests in Intellectual Property’ (2008) 6 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2008, 714–721.
Grabenwarter, Ch. , European Convention on Human Rights (CH Beck 2014)
Grád, A., Weller, M., A strasbourgi emberi jogi bíráskodás kézikönyve [Manual of Human Rights Arbitration of Strasbourg] (4 edn, HVG Orac 2011)
Gyenge, A. , Szerzői jogi korlátozások és a szerzői jog emberi jogi háttere [The System of Limitations and the Human Rights Background of Copyright] (HVG-ORAC 2010)
Helfer L. R. , Austin G. W., Human Rights and Intellectual Property (CUP 2011)
Hudson, A. , ‘Free Speech and Equality of Arms’ (2005) 3 European Human Rights Law Review, 301–309.
Karpenstein, U., Mayer, F. C., EMRK Konvention zum Schutz der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten (CH Beck 2012)
Koltay, A. , A szólásszabadság alapvonalai [Baselines of Freedom of Expression] (Századvég 2009)
Leach, Ph. , Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights (3 edn, OUP 2011)
Lillard, M. C. , ‘McGoliath v David: The European Court of Human Rights Recent “Equality of Arms” Decision’ (2005) 6 German Law Journal, 895–907.
Oliver, M. , ‘The McLibel case’ (2005) 15.2. The Guardian
Polgári, E. et al., ‘Alkotmányos és nemzetközi emberi jogi követelmények a rendes bíróságok gyakorlatában’ in Z Fleck (ed), Bíróságok mérlegen [Courts on Scale], vol 2 (Budapest 2008), 75–184.
Rahmatian, A. , ‘Trade Marks and Human Rights’ in PLC Torremans (ed), Intellectual Property and Human Rights (Wolters Kluwer 2008)
Rainey, B., Wicks. E., Ovey, C., Jacobs, White & Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights (6th edn, OUP 2014)
Sajó, A. , A szólásszabadság kézikönyve [Manual to the Freedom of Expression] (KJK–KERSZÖV 2005)
Sebastian, S. , ‘Geistiges Eigentum als europäisches Menschenrecht’ (2013) 6 GRUR International, 524–534.
Vida, S. , ‘’ (2014) 3 Iparjogvédelmi és Szerzői Jogi Szemle, 87–102.