View More View Less
  • * Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $576.00

This article summarizes the background of child abduction cases related to Hungary, giving a comprehensive analysis of such cases between the period of 2000 and 2014. In the first section, the reader finds a statistical analysis and the second part deals with the legal and practical background. The final conclusions give some recommendations for the European and domestic legislators. The essay was created as part of a report published by the European Parliament, collected by the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law on the actual situation of child abduction in Europe.

  • Blokker, P., New Democracies in Crisis? (Rutledge 2014)

  • Csink, L., B. Schanda and A. Zs. Varga (eds) The Basic Law of Hungary: A First Commentary (Clarus Press 2011)

  • Dilger, J., Die Regelungen zur internationalen Zuständigkeit in Ehesachen in der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2201/2003 (Mohr Siebeck 2004)

  • Dóczi, M., ‘The Current Laws Regulating Marital and Quasi-Marital Relationships in Hungary’ in Lynn D. Wardle and A. Scott Loveless (eds) Marriage and Quasi-Marital Relationships in Central and Eastern Europe: From the 2006 Vienna Colloquium on Marriage (BYU 2008), 117131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gárdos-Orosz, F., ‘A bírói döntések ellen benyújtott alkotmányjogi panaszok befogadhatósága II. Az Abtv. 27. §-a’ [The Acceptance of Constitutional Complaints Filed Against Court Decisions] (2013) 1 Alkotmánybírósági Szemle 8289.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kengyel, M., Harsági, V., Európai polgári eljárásjog [European Civil Procedural Law] (Osiris 2006)

  • Kozák, H., ‘Utolsó remény?! Az alkotmányjogi panasz esetleges jövoje a jogellenesen elvitt gyermek visszavitele iránti eljárásokban [The Last Hope: The Future of Constitutional Complaint in Processes on Returning of Abducted Children]’ (2013) 3 THEMIS 255277.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Köblös, A., ‘A „régi típusú” alkotmányjogi panasz az új Abtv.-ben [Old Style Constitutional Compaint in The New Constitution]’ (2012) 1 Alkotmánybírósági Szemle 8088.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Majtényi, B., ‘Legislative Stupidities in the New Hungarian Constitution’ (2012) 1 Pace diritti umani – Peace Human Rights, 105110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Naszladi, G., ‘Az alkotmányjogi panasz elso fél éve [The first half-year of constitutional complaint]’ (2012) 4 Közjogi Szemle 3844.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Richez-Pons, A., ‘Habitual Residence Considered as a European Harmonisation Factor in Family Law (Regarding Regulation Brussels II-bis)’ in K Boele-Woelki (ed) Common Core and Better Law in European Family Law (Intersentia 2005) 353361.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rogerson, P., ‘Habitual Residence: The New Domicile?’ (2000) 49 ICLQ 86107.

  • Somody, B. and Vissy, B., ‘Citizens’ Role in Constitutional Adjudication in Hungary: From the Actio Popularis to the Constitutional Complaint’ (2012) Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae, Sectio Iuridica 95108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stone, P., Private International Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2010)

  • Tahy-Kiss, K., ‘Bírósági rendelkezés a – büntetoeljárásban érvényesített – polgári jogi igényrol’ [Court Decision on Private Claims in Criminal Procedures] (2011) 2 Iustum Aequum Salutare 159180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tordai, Cs., ‘Az elso év tapasztalatairól [On The Experience Of The First Year]’ (2012) 2 Alkotmánybírósági Szemle 131133.

  • Tóth, G. A., (ed) Constitution for a Disunited Nation – On Hungary’s 2011 Fundamental Law (CEU Press 2012)

  • Vissy, B., ‘Az individuális alapjogvédelem kilátásai az alkotmánybíráskodásban. Merre mutat az alkotmányjogi panasz iránytuje? [The Future Of Individual Defence Of Fundamental Rights. What Shall Be The Future Of Constitutional Complaint]’ (2012) 2 Magyar Közigazgatás 2836.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation