View More View Less
  • 1 International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $700.00

This paper revisits the empirical trade literature on East-West trade in the early 1990s and provides a replication of the traditional gravity findings of that period with the Baier-Bergstrand version of the model, providing thereby better estimates of the trade hindering impact of the Cold War by including multilateral and world resistance factors and simultaneously considering country fixed effects. Breaking down the Cold War Walls increased world trade by 2.7% of world GDP. The replication with the Baier-Bergstrand model also reveals that Cold War trade distortions also significantly impacted China’s trade with the West.

  • Afman, E.R.Maurel, M. (2010): Diplomatic Relations and Trade Reorientation in Transition Countries. In: van Bergeijk, P.A.G.Brakman, S. (eds): The Gravity Model in International Trade: Advances and Applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 278295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Agudelo, D.Davidson, L.S. (2006): The Gravity of Globalization. Research in Global Strategic Management, 12: 79103.

  • Anderson, J.E.van Wincoop, E. (2003): Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1): 170192.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baier, S.L.Bergstrand, J.H. (2009): Bonus vetus OLS: A Simple Method for Approximating International Trade-Cost Effects Using the Gravity Equation. Journal of International Economics, 77(1): 7785.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baier, S.L.Bergstrand, J.H. (2010): Approximating General Equilibrium Impacts of Trade Liberalizations Using the Gravity Equation: Applications to NAFTA and the European Economic Area. In: van Bergeijk, P.A.G.Brakman, S. (eds): The Gravity Equation in International Trade. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van den Berg, M.de Nooij, M.Garretsen, H.de Groot, H.L.F. (2008): MKBA buitenland-instrumentarium (Cost-Benefit Analysis of Trade Policy Instruments). SEO Report, 2008–64. SEO Economic Research, Amsterdam.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van Bergeijk, P.A.G. (1994): Economic Diplomacy, Trade and Commercial Policy: Positive and Negative Sanctions in a New World Order. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van Bergeijk, P.A.G. (2009): Economic Diplomacy and the Geography of International Trade. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

  • van Bergeijk, P.A.G.Brakman, S. (2010): The Comeback of the Gravity Model. In: van Bergeijk, P.A.G.Brakman, S. (eds): The Gravity Equation in International Trade. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van Bergeijk, P.A.G.Lensink, B.W. (1993): Trade, Capital and the Transition in Central Europe. Applied Economics, 25: 891903.

  • van Bergeijk, P.A.G.Oldersma, H. (1990): Détente, Market-Oriented Reform and German Unification. Potential Consequences for the World Trade System. Kyklos, 43(4): 599609.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Breuss, F.Egger, P. (1999): How Reliable are Estimations of East-West Trade Potentials Based on Cross-Section Gravity. Empirica, 26: 8194.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bussière, M.Fidrmuc, J.Schnatz, B. (2005): Trade Integration of Central and Eastern European Countries: Lessons from a Gravity Model. ECB Working Paper, No. 545, Frankfurt.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bussière, M.Schnatz, B. (2006): Evaluating China’s Integration in World Trade with a Gravity Model Based Benchmark. ECB WorkingPaper, No. 693, Frankfurt.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • den Butter, F.A.G.Mosch, R.H.J. (2003): Trade, Trust and Transaction Costs. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, No. TI. 2003-082/3, Amsterdam.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chung, J.H. (2009): Between Alley and Partner: Korea-China Relations and the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Dekker, P.Ederveen, S.de Groot, H.van der Horst, A.Lejour, A.Straathof, B.Vinken, H.Wennekers, C. (2006): Divers Europe. European Outlook, 4. The Hague: SDU Publishing Company.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Disdier, A.C.Head, K. (2008): The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1): 3748.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Döhrn, R.Milton, A.R. (1992): Zur künftigen Einbindung der osteuropïhen Reformlä in der Weltwirtschaft (On the Integration into the World Economy of the Reforming Countries in Eastern Europe). RWI-Mitteilungen, 43, pp. 1940.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Erzan, R.Holmes, C.Safadi, R. (1992): How Changes in the CMEA Area May Affect International Trade in Manufactures. World Bank PRIT Working Papers Series, WPS 973, Washington, D.C.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fidrmuc, J.Fidrmuc, J. (2003): Disintegration and Trade. Review of International Economics, 11(5): 811829.

  • Flores-Macias, G.Kreps, S.E. (2013): The Foreign Policy Consequences of China’s Economic Rise: A Study of China’s Commercial Relations with Africa and Latin America, 1992–2006. Journal of Politics, 75(2): 357371.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Földvá P. van Leeuwen, B.Didenko, D. (2015): Capital Formation and Economic Growth under Central Planning and Transition: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, ca. 1920–2008. Acta Oeconomica, 1: 2750.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gleditsch, K.S. (2002): Expanded Trade and GDP Data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(5): 712724.

  • Guiso, L.Sapienza, P.Zingales, L. (2004): Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange. NBER Working Paper, 11005, Cambridge, MA.

  • Hamilton, C.B.Winters, L.A. (1992): Opening up International Trade with Eastern Europe. Economic Policy, 14: 77116.

  • Havrylyshyn, O.Pritchett, L. (1991): European Trade Patterns after the Transition. World Bank PRE Working Papers Series, WPS 748, Washington, D.C.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaplinsky, R.Messner, D. (2008): Introduction: The Impact of Asian Drivers on the Developing World. World Development, 36(2): 197209.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lankhuizen, M.Linders, G.J.de Groot, H.L.F. (2008): Distance and the Mode of Serving Markets. TI Discussion Paper, Amsterdam.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Linders, G.J. (2006): Intangible Barriers to Trade. PhD Thesis. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.

  • Maddison, A. (1995): Monitoring the World Economy 1820–1992. Paris: OECD.

  • Mayer, T.Zignago, S. (2011): Notes on CEPII’s Distances Measures: The GeoDist Database. CEPII Working Papers, No. 2011-25, Paris.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Melitz, J.Toubal, F. (2012): Native Language, Spoken Language, Translation and Trade. CEPII Working Papers, 2012–17, Paris.

  • Moons, S.van Bergeijk, P.A.G. (2013): Does Economic Diplomacy Work? A Meta Analysis on the Effect of Economic Diplomacy on International Economic Flows. Paper presented at the 7th Colloquium of the Meta Analysis of Economic Research Network (MAER-Net), University of Greenwich.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nitsch, V.Wolf, N. (2013): Tear Down This Wall: On the Persistence of Borders in Trade. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 46(1): 154179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OECD (1993): Economic Outlook 53. Paris.

  • Wang, Z.K.Winters, L.A. (1991): The Trading Potential of Eastern Europe. CEPR Discussion Paper Series, 610, London.

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

  • Impact Factor (2019): 0.914
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 0.439
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 12
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q2 Economics and Econometrics
  • Impact Factor (2018): 0.84
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 0.311
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 11
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q3 Economics and Econometrics

Language: English

Founded in 1966
Publication: One volume of two issues annually
Publication Programme: 2020. Vol. 70.
Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • EconLit
  • Elsevier GEO Abstracts
  • GEOBASE
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • JEL
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • RePEc
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index

 

Subscribers can access the electronic version of every printed article.

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Prof. Dr. Mihályi, Péter

Editor(s): Ványai, Judit

Editorial Board

      Török, Ádám (Chairman)
      Berlinger, Edina
      Halmai, Péter
      Kézdi, Gábor
      Kónya, István
      Köllő, János
      Magas, István

Advisory Board

      Ǻslund, Anders
      Kolodko, Grzegorz
      Mau, Vladimir
      Messerlin, Patrick A
      Nuti, Mario Domenico
      Wagener, Hans-Jürgen

Corvinus University of Budapest
Department of Macroeconomics
Fővám tér 8, Budapest, H-1093, Hungary