View More View Less
  • 1 Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $700.00

Chinese infrastructural projects like the “Belt & Road Initiative” or the “Chinese 16 + 1 Initiative” are trapped in geopolitical narratives. Geopolitical concepts dressed in scientific robes make the logic of warfare begin to prevail over the logic of cooperation. As a consequence, something that was to be an opportunity for less developed countries, becomes the axis of conflict between the great powers. In this paper, I identify the logic of warfare as an underlining characteristic of geopolitical reasoning and show why it is incompatible with economic approach. I also argue that geopolitical concepts are not scientific theories, but rather self-fulfilling prophecies. This theoretical background allows to detect the biggest obstacles related to many Chinese initiatives, and also indicates some necessary means to neutralize geopolitical narratives.

  • Arase, D. (2015): China's Two Silk Roads Initiative: What It Means for Southwest Asia. Southeast Asian Affairs, 1: 2545.

  • Bhoothalingam, R. (2015): The Silk Road as a Global Brand. ASCI Journal of Management, 44 (2): 6068.

  • Chołaj, H. (2014): Chiny a Świat Współczesny. Chiński Model Ekonomiczny (China and Contemporary World. The Chinese Economic Model). Warsawa: SGH, Warsaw School of Economics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clarke, M. (2018): The Belt and Road Initiative: Exploring Beijing's Motivations and Challenges for Its New Silk Road. Strategic Analysis, 42: 84102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blackwill, R. D.Harris, J. M. (2015): War by Other Means. New York: Belknap Press.

  • Blanchard, F.Flint, C. (2017): The Geopolitics of China's Maritime Silk Road Initiative. Geopolitics, 22 (2): 223245.

  • Eberhardt, P. (2011): Halford Mackinder's Concept of Heartland. Przegląd Geograficzny, 83 (2): 251266.

  • Eberhardt, P. (2014): Nicholas Spykman's Concept of Rimland i jej konsekwencje geopolityczne (Nicholas Spykman's Concept of Rimland and Its Geopolitical Consequences). Przegląd Geograficzny, 86 (2): 261280.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fallon, T. (2015): The New Silk Road: Xi Jinping's Grand Strategy for Eurasia. American Foreign Policy Interest, 37 (3): 140147.

  • Ferguson, N. (2008): Empire. How Briatin Made the Modern World? New York: Penguin.

  • Gerstl, A. (2018): China's New Silk Roads. Categorising and Grouping the World: Beijing's 16+1+X European Formula. Vienna Journal of East Asian Studies, 10 (1): 3158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Góralczyk, B. (2018): Wielki Renesans (A Great Renaissance). Warsawa DIALOG.

  • Harvey, D. (2005): A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Hu, B. (2018): The Belt and Road Initiative and the Transformation of Globalization. ALK & TIGER Distinguished Lectures Series, No. 26,

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jakóbowski, J.Kaczmarski, M. (2017): Nietrafiona oferta Pekinu: “16+1” a chińska polityka wobec Unii Europejskiej (An Unsuccessful Beijing Offer: “16+1” and Chinese Policy towards the EU). Warsawa Centre for Eastern Studies, OSW (Ośrodka Studiów Wschodnich).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kołodko, G. W. (2008): Truth, Errors and Lies. Politics and Economics in a Volatile World. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Kołodko, G. W. (2018): Socialism, Capitalism, or Chinism? Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 51 (4): 285298.

  • Kotarbiński, T. (1955): Dzieła Wszystkie. Traktat o dobrej robocie (A Treaty about Good Work). Republished: Warsaw, Wydawnictwo Ossolineum, 2000.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kowalski, B. (2017): China's Foreign Policy towards Central and Eastern Europe: The “16+1” Format in the South-South Cooperation Perspective. Cases of the Czech Republic and Hungary. Cambridge Journal of Euroasian Studies, 16 (1): 153162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Luttwak, E. (1990): From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce. National Interest, 20: 1723.

  • Luttwak, E. (2001): Strategy. The Logic of War and Peace. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.

  • Mackinder, H. (1904): The Geographical Pivot of History. The Geographical Journal, 23 (4): 421437.

  • Malinowski, G. M. (2012): Samospelniająca się przepowiednia – definicja, identyfikacja i wyzwania (Self-fulfilling Prophecy – Definition, Identification and Challenges). Transformacje, 1 (72): 220.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merton, R. K. (1948): The Self Fulfilling Prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8 (2): 193210.

  • Moczulski, L. (1999): Geopolityka. Warsaw: Bellona.

  • Morris, I. (2010): Why the West Rules – for Now. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

  • Piskozub, A. (2010): Miejsce geopolityki w klasyfikacji dyscyplin nauki z geografia, historią i polityką w ich nazwach (Positioning of Geopolitics in the Classification of Disciplines Containing Geography, History and Politics in Their Name). Przegląd Geopolityczny, 2: 2943.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Płaczek, J. (ed.) (2015): Współczesna wojna handlowo – gospodarcza (A Contemporary Trade War). Warsaw: Difin.

  • Rodrik, D. (2011): The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York: Norton.

  • Shahriar, S. (2019): The Belt and Road Initiative: What will China Offer the World in Its Rise. Asian Journal of Political Science, 27 (1): 152156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sen, G. (2016): China – One Belt and One Road Initiative: Strategic & Economic Implications. New Delhi: VIVEKANANDA International Foundation.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Soros, G. (2008): The New Paradigm for Financial Markets: The Credit Crisis of 2008 and What It Means. New York: Public Affairs.

  • Schelling, T. (1960): The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Spykman, N. (1944): The Geography of the Peace. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

  • Sułek, M. (2001): Podstawy Potęgonomii I Potęgometrii (Principles of Powernomics and Powermetrics). Kielce: Kieleckie Towarzystwo Edukacji Ekonomicznej.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sułek, M. (2008): Trzy Działy Prakseologii (Three Dimensions of Praxeology). Scientific Year's Issue of the Faculty of Management in Ciechanów of Wyższa Szkoła Menedżerska, 2 (1-2): 5170.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vangeli, A. (2017): China's Engagement with the Sixteen Countries of Central, East and Southeast Europe under the Belt and Road Initiative. China & World Economy, 25 (5): 101124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

  • Impact Factor (2019): 0.914
  • Economics and Econometrics SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q2
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 0.311
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 11

Language: English

Founded in 1966
Publication: One volume of two issues annually
Publication Programme: 2020. Vol. 70.
Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • EconLit
  • Elsevier GEO Abstracts
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • JEL
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • RePEc
  • Social Science Citation Index


Subscribers can access the electronic version of every printed article.

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Prof. Dr. Mihályi, Péter

Editor(s): Ványai, Judit

Editorial Board

      Török, Ádám (Chairman)
      Berlinger, Edina
      Halmai, Péter
      Kézdi, Gábor
      Kónya, István
      Köllő, János
      Magas, István

Advisory Board

      Ǻslund, Anders
      Kolodko, Grzegorz
      Mau, Vladimir
      Messerlin, Patrick A
      Nuti, Mario Domenico
      Wagener, Hans-Jürgen

Corvinus University of Budapest
Department of Macroeconomics
Fővám tér 8, Budapest, H-1093, Hungary