Authors:
M. Tóth Plant Protection Institute, CAR, Budapest, P. O. Box. 102, H-1525, Hungary

Search for other papers by M. Tóth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A. Nagy Faculty of the Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, P. O. Box 400, H-4002, Hungary

Search for other papers by A. Nagy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
I. Szarukán Faculty of the Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, P. O. Box 400, H-4002, Hungary

Search for other papers by I. Szarukán in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
K. Ary Faculty of the Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, P. O. Box 400, H-4002, Hungary

Search for other papers by K. Ary in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A. Cserenyec Faculty of the Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, P. O. Box 400, H-4002, Hungary

Search for other papers by A. Cserenyec in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B. Fenyődi Faculty of the Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, P. O. Box 400, H-4002, Hungary

Search for other papers by B. Fenyődi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. Gombás Faculty of the Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, P. O. Box 400, H-4002, Hungary

Search for other papers by D. Gombás in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
T. Lajkó Faculty of the Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, P. O. Box 400, H-4002, Hungary

Search for other papers by T. Lajkó in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. Merva Faculty of the Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, P. O. Box 400, H-4002, Hungary

Search for other papers by L. Merva in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Szabó Faculty of the Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, P. O. Box 400, H-4002, Hungary

Search for other papers by J. Szabó in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P. Winkler Faculty of the Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, P. O. Box 400, H-4002, Hungary

Search for other papers by P. Winkler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
J. K. Jósvai Plant Protection Institute, CAR, Budapest, P. O. Box. 102, H-1525, Hungary

Search for other papers by J. K. Jósvai in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open access

The addition of synthetic (E)-anethol to the known attractant phenylacetaldehyde synergized attraction of the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera, the blend invariably catching 4 to 6 times more than phenylacetaldehyde on its own. Highest catches were recorded by the 1:1-3:1 blends. The addition of salicyl aldehyde, ±linalool, (R)-(+)-limonene, 2-methoxybenzyl alcohol and 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol (compounds described earlier in the literature as co-attractants for H. armigera), increased catches when added to phenylacetaldehyde. However, the addition of these compounds did not increase catches of the (E)-anethol+pheny- lacetaldehyde blend. When directly compared with performance of the synthetic pheromone, the (E)-anethol +phenylacetaldehyde blend caught an average of 27% of the catch in pheromone baited traps. On an average 79% of moths caught in traps with the (E)-anethol+phenylacetaldehyde blend were females, while traps with pheromone caught only males. The (E)-anethol+phenylacetaldehyde blend described in this study may form the basis for the development of an efficient bisexual lure for H. armigera AFTER further optimization.

  • Bruce, T. J. and Cork, A. (2001): Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of female Helicoverpa armigera to compounds identified in flowers of African marigold, Tagetes erecta .J. Chem. Ecol. 27, 11191131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burguiere, L., Marion-Poll, F. and Cork, A. (2001): Electrophysiological responses of female Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) to synthetic host odours. J. Insect Physiol. 47, 509514.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cantelo, W. W. and Jacobson, M. (1979): Phenylacetaldehyde attracts moths to bladder flower and to blacklight traps. Environ. Entomol. 8, 444447.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cork, A. (2016): Insect attractant compositions. United States Patent US 9, 3867,766 B2.

  • Creighton, C. S., McFadden, T. L. and Cuthbert, E. R. (1973): Supplementary data on phenylacetaldehyde: an attractant for Lepidoptera. J. Econ. Entomol. 66, 114116.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deng Jian-yu, Huang Yong-ping, Wei Hong-yi and Du Jia-wei (2004): EAG and behavioral responses of Helicoverpa armigera males to volatiles from poplar leaves and their combinations with sex pheromone. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. 5, 15771582.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dunkelblum, E. Gothilf, S. and Kehat, M. (1980): Identification of the sex pheromone of the cotton bollworm, Heliothis armigera, in Israel. Phytoparasitica. 8, 209211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gregg, P. C., Del Socorro A. P. and Henderson, G. S. (2010): Development of a synthetic plant volatile-based at- tracticide for female noctuid moths. II. Bioassays of synthetic plant volatiles as attractants for the adults of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Aust. J. Ent. 49, 2130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knight, A. L. and Light, D. M. (2004): Use of ethyl and propyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate in codling moth management: Improving monitoring in Bartlett pear with high dose lures. J. Ent. Soc. British Columbia 101, 4552.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knight, A. L. and Light, D. M. (2005): Timing of egg hatch by early-season codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) predicted by moth catch in pear ester- and codlemone-baited traps. Can. Ent. 137, 728738.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kriticos, D., Ota, N., Hutchison, W., Beddow, J., Walsh, T., Tay, W., Borchert, D., Paula-Moraes, S., Czepak, C. and Zalucki, M. (2015): The potential distribution of invading Helicoverpa armigera in North America: is it just a matter of time? PloS One 10(3):e0119618, doi:.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meagher, R. L. (2001): Collection of soybean looper and other noctuids in phenylacetaldehyde-baited traps. Fla. Entomol. 84, 154155.

  • Muralimohan, K. and Srinivasa, Y. B. (2008): Occurrence of protandry in an aseasonal multivoltine moths: Implications for body-size evolution. Current Science 94, 513518.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nesbitt, B. F., Beevor, P. S., Hall, D. R. and Lester, R. (1980): (Z)-9-Hexadecenal: a minor component of the femle sex pheromone of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera, Noctuide). Ent. Exp. Appl. 27, 306308.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pawar, C. S., Srivastava, C. P., and Reed, W. (1983): Phenylacetaldehyde: an attractant for Heliothis armigera. Int. Chickpea Newsletter 1983, 2728.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roelofs, W. L. and Cardé, R. T. (1977): Responses of Lepidoptera to synthetic sex pheromone chemicals and their analogues. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 22, 377405.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sexton, S. (2002): Noctuid attractant composition. United States Patent US 20050147640 A1.

  • Srinivasan, R., Uthamasamy, S. and Talekar, N. S. (2006): Characterization of oviposition attractants of Heli- coverpa armigera in two solanaceaus plants, Solanum viarum and Lycopersicon esculentum. Curr. Sci. 90, 846850.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Subchev, M., Toshova, T., Tóth, M., Voigt, E., Mikulás, J. and Francke, W. (2004): Catches of vine bud moth Theresimima ampellophaga (Lep., Zygaenidae: Procridinae) males in pheromone traps: effect of the purity and age of baits, design, colour and height of the traps, and daily sexual activity of males. Z. Angew. Ent. 128, 4450.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tóth, M., Imrei, Z. and Szöcs, G. (2000): Non-sticky, non-saturable, high capacity new pheromone traps for Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Helicoverpa (Heliothis) armigera (Lepi- doptera: Noctuidae). Integr. Term. Kert. Szántóf. Kult. 21, 4449. (in Hung.).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tóth, M., Landolt, P., Szarukán, I., Nagy, A. and Jósvai, J. K. (2019): Improving bisexual lures for the silver Y moth Autographa gamma L. and related Plusiinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Acta Phytopath. et Entomol. Hung. 54, 137146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tóth, M., Szarukán, I., Dorogi, B., Gulyás, A., Nagy, P., and Rozgonyi, Z. (2010): Male and female noctuid moths attracted to synthetic lures in Europe. J. Chem. Ecol. 36, 592598.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wall, C. (1989): Evaluation and use of behaviour-modifying chemicals. In: A. R. Jutsum, and R. F. S. Gordon (eds): Insect Pheromones in Plant Protection. Wiley, Chicester, pp. 3960.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Witzgall, P., Kirsch, P. and Cork, A. (2010): Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management. J. Chem. Ecol. 36, 80100.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Submit Your Manuscript
 
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

Editor-in-Chief

Jenő KONTSCHÁN Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary

Technical Editor

Ágnes TURÓCI Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary

Section Editor

K SALÁNKI Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
 

Editorial Board

Z BOZSÓ Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
PE CHETVERIKOV Saint-Petersburg State University, Russia
JX CUI Henan Institute of Science and Technology, China
J FODOR Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
Z IMREI Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
BM KAYDAN Çukurova University, Turkey
L KISS University of Southern Queensland, Australia
V MARKÓ Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Hungary
MW NEGM Ibaraki University, Japan
L PALKOVICS Széchenyi István University, Hungary
M POGÁNY Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
D RÉDEI National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan
A TOLSTIKOV University of Tyumen, Russia
J VUTS Rothamsted Research, UK
GQ WANG Guangxi University, China

Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica
P.O. Box 102
H-1525 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 487 7534
Fax: (36 1) 487 7555
E-mail: acta@atk.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Biological Abstracts
  • BIOSIS Previews
  • CAB Abstracts
  • CABELLS Journalytics
  • Chemical Abstracts
  • Elsevier GEO Abstracts
  • Globals Health
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • SCOPUS
  • Zoological Abstracts

 

 

2022  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
not indexed
Journal Impact Factor not indexed
Rank by Impact Factor

not indexed

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
not indexed
5 Year
Impact Factor
not indexed
Journal Citation Indicator not indexed
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

not indexed

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
22
Scimago
Journal Rank
0.211
Scimago Quartile Score

Insect Science (Q4)

Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1.1
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Insect Science 124/173 (28th PCTL)
Plant Science 385/487 (21st PCTL)
Scopus
SNIP
0.375

2021  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
not indexed
Journal Impact Factor not indexed
Rank by Impact Factor

not indexed

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
not indexed
5 Year
Impact Factor
not indexed
Journal Citation Indicator not indexed
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

not indexed

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
21
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,29
Scimago Quartile Score Insect Science (Q3)
Plant Science (Q3)
Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1,3
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Insect Science 107/172 (Q3)
Plant Science 316/482 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,481

2020  
Scimago
H-index
20
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,185
Scimago
Quartile Score
Insect Science Q4
Plant Science Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
75/98=0,8
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Insect Science 129/153 (Q4)
Plant Science 353/445 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,438
Scopus
Cites
313
Scopus
Documents
20
Days from submission to acceptance 64
Days from acceptance to publication 209
Acceptance
Rate
48%

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
19
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,177
Scimago
Quartile Score
Insect Science Q4
Plant Science Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
66/103=0,6
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Insect Science 125/142 (Q4)
Plant Science 344/431 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,240
Scopus
Cites
212
Scopus
Documents
24
Acceptance
Rate
35%

 

Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2023 Online subsscription: 472 EUR / 576 USD
Print + online subscription: 552 EUR / 670 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1966
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
2
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0238-1249 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2691 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Dec 2023 0 21 2
Jan 2024 0 12 6
Feb 2024 0 8 5
Mar 2024 0 8 7
Apr 2024 0 12 6
May 2024 0 15 4
Jun 2024 0 0 0