Authors:
,
,
,
,
, and
Zsidó N. András
zsido.andras@pte.hu
Zsidó N. András
Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Pszichológia Intézet, Pécs
Search for other papers by Zsidó N. András in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zsidó N. András in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Arató Nikolett
Arató Nikolett
Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Pszichológia Intézet, Pécs
Search for other papers by Arató Nikolett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Arató Nikolett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Inhóf Orsolya
Inhóf Orsolya
Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Pszichológia Intézet, Pécs
Search for other papers by Inhóf Orsolya in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Inhóf Orsolya in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Budai Timea
Budai Timea
Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Pszichológia Intézet, Pécs
Search for other papers by Budai Timea in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Budai Timea in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Stecina T. Diána
Stecina T. Diána
Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Pszichológia Intézet, Pécs
Search for other papers by Stecina T. Diána in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stecina T. Diána in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Labadi Beatrix
Labadi Beatrix
Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Pszichológia Intézet, Pécs
Search for other papers by Labadi Beatrix in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Labadi Beatrix in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bevezetés: A bizonytalanságintolerancia egy egyén alapvető képtelenségét jelenti a negatív események előfordulásának, valamint az ilyen események be nem jósolhatóságának elvi selésére. Az ebből fakadó állandósult stressz és túlzott aggodalom súlyos fizikai és men tális problémákhoz vezethet. Korábbi tanulmányok eredményei szerint a jelenség a szo rongásos és a depresszív pszichiátriai zavarok alapja lehet. Célkitűzés: A jelen tanulmány célja a Bizonytalanságintolerancia Skála rövidített változatának pszichometriai elemzése egy megfelelően nagy és az életkor szempontjából diverz magyar anyanyelvű mintán. Módszer: A keresztmetszeti kutatás keretében összesen 1297 fő (300 férfi és 993 nő, 4 fő nem válaszolt) töltötte ki a kérdőívcsomagot. A résztvevők átlagéletkora 44,6 év (SD = 22,44 év; terjedelem: 18–83 év). A rövidített Bizonytalanságintolerancia Skála mellett a résztve vők kitöltötték a World Health Organization Jól-lét Indexet, valamint a Beck Depresszió Leltár és a Spielberger-féle Vonásszorongás Skála rövidített változatát. A Bizonytalanság intolerancia Skála pszichometriai mutatóit klasszikus és modern tesztelméleti mód szerekkel is ellenőriztük. Eredmények: A Bizonytalanságintolerancia Skála megfelelő pszichometriai mutatókkal rendelkezik a vizsgált magyar mintán (McDonaldω = 0,82 és 0,84). A kérdőív tételei jól diszkriminálnak a látens változó különböző szintjeivel rendel kező kitöltők között, és a kérdőív összességében megbízhatóan mér meglehetősen nagy szórástartományban (±2 szórás); tehát a bizonytalanságtűrés képességéről a populáció hozzávetőlegesen 95%-án képes információt szolgáltatni. A kérdőív skálái és összpontszáma az elvártak szerint összefüggést mutatnak rokon konstruktumokkal, mint pl. szorongás (r = 0,22–0,36; p < 0,001) és depresszió (r = 0,26–0,40; p < 0,001). Következtetések: Összességében a Bizonytalanságintolerancia Skála rövid változata magyar mintán is megbízható és érvényes kérdőív. Alkalmazható lehet a mentális egészség fejlesztése, a szorongás és a depresszió prevenciójára, valamint terápiás hatékonyságvizsgálat so rán is.
Introduction: Intolerance of uncertainty refers to an individual’s fundamental inability to tolerate the occurrence of negative events as well as the unpredictability of such events. The resulting constant stress and excessive worry can lead to severe physical and mental problems. Previous studies suggest that it can serve as the root of anxiety and depression related psychiatric disorders. Aim: The aim of the present study was to present the psychometric properties of the short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale in a sufficiently large and agediverse Hungarian sample. Method: A total of 1297 respondents (300 men and 993 women, 4 chose not to answer) completed the survey. The mean age of the participants was 44.63 years (SD = 22.44 years; range = 18–83 years). In addition to the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale, participants completed the World Health Organization Well-Being Index, and the short versions of the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Spielberger Trait Anxiety Scale. The psychometric properties of the shortened Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale were tested using classical and modern test theory methods. Results: The shortened Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale has appropriate psychometric indicators on a Hungarian sample (McDonald’s ω = 0.82 and 0.84). The items of the questionnaire discriminated well between respondents with different levels of the latent variable, and the questionnaire measured well over a large deviation of scores (±2 SD); thus, it is able to provide information on the ability to tolerate uncertainty in approximately 95% of the population. The subscales and total score of the questionnaire correlated with related constructs as we previously expected, for instance anxiety (r = 0.22–0.36, p < 0.001) and depression (r = 0.26–0.40, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Overall, the short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale is also a reliable and valid questionnaire for the Hungarian sample. It can be used for efficacy testing of mental health promotion, anxiety and depression prevention, or therapeutic intervention.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th ed. In Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th ed. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association
-
Baker, F.B. (2001). The Basics of Item Response Theory (2nd ed.). College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation
-
Balsamo, M., Cataldi, F., Carlucci, L., & Fairfield, B. (2018). Assessment of anxiety in older adults: A review of self-report measures. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 13, 573–593.
-
Bandelow, B., & Michaelis, S. (2015). Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 17(3), 327–335.
-
Bandelow, B., Reitt, M., Röver, C., Michaelis, S., Görlich, Y., & Wedekind, D. (2015). Efficacy of treatments for anxiety disorders. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 30(4), 183–192.
-
Bereczkei, T. (2000). Evolutionary psychology: A new perspective in the behavioral sciences. European Psychologist, 5(3), 175–190.
-
Blom, E. H., Bech, P., Högberg, G., Larsson, J. O., & Serlachius, E. (2012). Screening for depressed mood in an adolescent psychiatric context by brief self-assessment scales–testing psychometric validity of WHO-5 and BDI-6 indices by latent trait analyses. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10:149. DOI:
-
Brosschot, J.F., Verkuil, B., & Thayer, J. (2018). Generalized unsafety theory of stress: Unsafe environments and conditions, and the default stress response. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), 464. DOI:
-
Brosschot, J.F., Verkuil, B., & Thayer, J.F. (2015). The default response to uncertainty and the importance of perceived safety in anxiety and stress: An evolution-theoretical perspective. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 41, 22–34.
-
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21(2), 230–258.
-
Buhr, K., & Dugas, M.J. (2002). The intolerance of uncertainty scale: Psychometric properties of the English version. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(8), 931–945.
-
Carleton, N.R. (2016). Fear of the unknown: One fear to rule them all? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 41, 5–21.
-
Carleton, N.R., Mulvogue, M.K., Thibodeau, M.A., McCabe, R.E., Antony, M.M., & Asmundson, G.J.G. (2012). Increasingly certain about uncertainty: Intolerance of uncertainty across anxiety and depression. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(3), 468–479.
-
Carleton, N.R., Norton, M.A.P.J., & Asmundson, G.J.G. (2007). Fearing the unknown: A short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21(1), 105–117.
-
Carleton, N.R., Sharpe, D., & Asmundson, G.J.G. (2007). Anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty: Requisites of the fundamental fears? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(10), 2307–2316.
-
Carleton, N.R., Weeks, J.W., Howell, A.N., Asmundson, G.J.G., Antony, M.M., & McCabe, R.E. (2012). Assessing the latent structure of the intolerance of uncertainty construct: An initial taxometric analysis. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(1), 150–157.
-
Chalmers, R.P. (2012). Mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(1), 1–29.
-
Dugas, M.J., Hedayati, M., Karavidas, A., Buhr, K., Francis, K., & Phillips, N.A. (2005). Intolerance of uncertainty and information processing: Evidence of biased recall and interpretations. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29(1), 57–70.
-
Dunn, T.J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412.
-
Fergus, T.A. (2013). A comparison of three self-report measures of intolerance of uncertainty: An examination of structure and incremental explanatory power in a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1322–1331.
-
Freeston, M.H., Rhéaume, J., Letarte, H., Dugas, M.J., & Ladouceur, R. (1994). Why do people worry? Personality and Individual Differences, 17(6), 791–802.
-
Gentes, E.L., & Ruscio, A.M. (2011). A metaanalysis of the relation of intolerance of uncertainty to symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and obsessivecompulsive disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(6), 923–933.
-
Greco, V., & Roger, D. (2003). Uncertainty, stress, and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(6), 1057–1068.
-
Holaway, R.M., Heimberg, R.G., & Coles, M.E. (2006). A comparison of intolerance of uncertainty in analogue obsessive-compulsive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 20(2), 158–174.
-
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.
-
Jaso, B.A., Hudiburgh, S.E., Heller, A.S., & Timpano, K.R. (2020). The relationship between affect intolerance, maladaptive emotion regulation, and psychological symptoms. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 13(1), 67–82.
-
JASP Team (2019). JASP (Version 0.10.2)[Computer software]. Letöltve: 2020. 08. 01jén: https://jasp-stats.org/
-
Jensen, D., Cohen, J.N., Mennin, D.S., Fresco, D.M., & Heimberg, R.G. (2016). Clarifying the unique associations among intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety, and depression. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 45(6), 431–444.
-
Kessler, R.C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K.R., & Walters, E.E. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and ageofonset distributions of DSMIV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 593–602.
-
Khawaja, N.G., & Yu, L.N.H. (2010). A comparison of the 27-item and 12-item intolerance of uncertainty scales. Clinical Psychologist, 14(3), 97–106.
-
LeDoux, J.E. (2012). Rethinking the Emotional Brain. Neuron, 73(4), 653–676.
-
LeDoux, J.E., & Daw, N.D. (2018). Surviving threats: Neural circuit and computational implications of a new taxonomy of defensive behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19(5), 269–282.
-
Li, C.H. (2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369–387.
-
Marks, I., & Nesse, R.M. (1994). Fear and fitness: An evolutionary analysis of anxiety disorders. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(5–6), 247–261.
-
McDermott, K.A., Smith, H.L., & Cougle, J.R. (2019). An examination of perseverative thinking and perception of threat from emotion as mechanisms underlying the relationship between distress intolerance and internalizing symptoms. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 43(3), 561–569.
-
McEvoy, P.M., & Mahoney, A.E.J. (2011). Achieving certainty about the structure of intolerance of uncertainty in a treatment-seeking sample with anxiety and depression. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(1), 112–122.
-
McEvoy, P.M., & Mahoney, A.E.J. (2012). To be sure, to be sure: Intolerance of uncertainty mediates symptoms of various anxiety disorders and depression. Behavior Therapy, 43(3), 533–545.
-
Mueller, A.E., Segal, D.L., Gavett, B., Marty, M.A., Yochim, B., June, A., et al. (2015). Geriatric Anxiety Scale: Item response theory analysis, differential item functioning, and creation of a tenitem short form (GAS10). International Psychogeriatrics, 27(7), 1099–1111.
-
Nesse, R.M. (2005). Natural selection and the regulation of defenses. A signal detection analysis of the smoke detector principle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(1), 88–105.
-
Ouellet, C., Langlois, F., Provencher, M.D., & Gosselin, P. (2019). Intolerance of uncertainty and difficulties in emotion regulation: Proposal for an integrative model of generalized anxiety disorder. Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee, 69(1), 9–18.
-
Radnóti, I. (2014). A vállalkozói kockázatokhoz való viszonyulás közgazdasági főiskolai hallgatók és kisvállalkozók körében. PhDértekezés. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem. Letöltve: 2019. május 11-én: https://ppk.elte.hu/file/radnoti_istvan_disszertacio.pdf
-
Remes, O., Brayne, C., Van Der Linde, R., & Lafortune, L. (2016). A systematic review of reviews on the prevalence of anxiety disorders in adult populations. Brain and Behavior, 6(7): e00497. DOI:
-
Robichaud, M., Dugas, M.J., & Conway, M. (2003). Gender differences in worry and associated cognitivebehavioral variables. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 17(5), 501–516.
-
Rozgonjuk, D., Elhai, J.D., Täht, K., Vassil, K., Levine, J.C., & Asmundson, G.J.G. (2019). Non-social smartphone use mediates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and problematic smartphone use: Evidence from a repeatedmeasures study. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 56–62.
-
Rózsa, S., Szádóczky, E., & Füredi, J. (2001). A Beck Depresszió Kérdőív rövidített változa tának jellemzői a hazai mintán. Psychiatria Hungarica, 16(4), 379–397.
-
Samejima, F. (1968). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1968(1), 1–169.
-
Selye, H. (1946). The general adaptation syndrome and the diseases of adaptation. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 6(2), 117–230.
-
Selye, H. (1951). The GeneralAdaptationSyndrome. Annual Review of Medicine, 2(1), 327–342.
-
Strout, T.D., Hillen, M., Gutheil, C., Anderson, E., Hutchinson, R., Ward, H., et al. (2018). Tolerance of uncertainty: A systematic review of health and healthcare-related outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(9), 1518–1537.
-
Susánszky, É., Konkoly Thege, B., Stauder, A., & Kopp, M. (2006). A WHO Jól-Lét Kérdő ív rövidített (WBI-5) magyar változatának validálása a Hungarostudy 2002 országos lakossági egészségfelmérés alapján. Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, 7(3), 247–255.
-
Tiego, J., Oostermeijer, S., Prochazkova, L., Parkes, L., Dawson, A., Youssef, G., et al. (2019). Overlapping dimensional phenotypes of impulsivity and compulsivity explain co-occurrence of addictive and related behaviors. CNS Spectrums, 24(4), 426–440.
-
Topp, C.W., Østergaard, S.D., Søndergaard, S., & Bech, P. (2015). The WHO-5 well-being index: A systematic review of the literature. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84(3), 167–176.
-
Yook, K., Kim, K.H., Suh, S.Y., & Lee, K.S. (2010). Intolerance of uncertainty, worry, and rumination in major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24(6), 623–628.
-
Zlomke, K.R., & Hahn, K.S. (2010). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies: Gender differences and associations to worry. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 408–413.
-
Zsido, A.N. (2019). A fenyegető ingerek hatására fellépő figyelmi torzítások és változások a fenntartott figyelmi folyamatokban: Áttekintés. Magyar Pszichologiai Szemle, 74(2), 233–255.
-
Zsido, A.N., Arato, N., Inhof, O., Janszky, J., & Darnai, G. (2018). Short versions of two specific phobia measures: The snake and the spider questionnaires. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 54, 11–16.
-
Zsido, A.N., Teleki, S.A., Csokasi, K., Rozsa, S., & Bandi, S.A. (2020). Development of the short version of the spielberger state—trait anxiety inventory. Psychiatry Research, 291, 113223. DOI:
Please, download the file from HERE
Instructions for reviews in Hungarian HERE
Editorial Correspondence: Czeglédi, Edit
Institute of Behavioural Sciences
Semmelweis University
Nagyvárad tér 4.
H-1089 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 210 2930 ext. 56151 ---- Fax: (36 1) 210 2955
E-mail: mentalhigiene.pszichoszomatika@gmail.com
Indexing and Abstracting Services:
- PsychInfo
- SCOPUS
- CABELLS Journalytics
| 2022 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Total Cites WoS |
not indexed |
| Journal Impact Factor | not indexed |
| Rank by Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
not indexed |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Journal Citation Indicator | not indexed |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator |
not indexed |
| Scimago | |
| Scimago H-index |
15 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0.165 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology Q4 |
| Scopus | |
| Scopus Cite Score |
0.7 |
| Scopus CIte Score Rank |
Psychiatry and Mental Health 441/531 (17th PCTL) Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 61/68 (11th PCTL) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0.361 |
| 2021 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Total Cites WoS |
not indexed |
| Journal Impact Factor | not indexed |
| Rank by Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
not indexed |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Journal Citation Indicator | not indexed |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator |
not indexed |
| Scimago | |
| Scimago H-index |
13 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,127 |
| Scimago Quartile Score | Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (Q4) Psychiatry and Mental Health (Q4) |
| Scopus | |
| Scopus Cite Score |
0,3 |
| Scopus CIte Score Rank |
Psychiatry and Mental Health 485/529 (Q4) Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 62/65 (Q4) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,106 |
| 2020 | |
|---|---|
| Scimago H-index |
11 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,15 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology Q4 Psychiatry and Mental Health Q4 |
| Scopus Cite Score |
23/67=0,3 |
| Scopus Cite Score Rank |
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 57/60 (Q4) Psychiatry and Mental Health 452/502 (Q4) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,24 |
| Scopus Cites |
77 |
| Scopus Documents |
14 |
| Days from submission to acceptance | 140 |
| Days from acceptance to publication | 90 |
| 2019 | |
|---|---|
| Scimago H-index |
10 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,127 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology Q4 Psychiatry and Mental Health Q4 |
| Scopus Cite Score |
26/70=0,4 |
| Scopus Cite Score Rank |
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 59/61 (Q4) Psychiatry and Mental Health 442/506 (Q4) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,135 |
| Scopus Cites |
67 |
| Scopus Documents |
18 |
| Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika | |
|---|---|
| Publication Model | Online Only Hybrid |
| Submission Fee | none |
| Article Processing Charge | 900 EUR/article |
| Printed Color Illustrations | 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece |
| Regional discounts on country of the funding agency | World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50% World Bank Low-income economies: 100% |
| Further Discounts | Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50% Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100% |
| Subscription fee 2023 | Online subsscription: 104 EUR / 128 USD |
| Subscription Information | Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content. |
| Purchase per Title | Individual articles are sold on the displayed price. |
| Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika | |
|---|---|
| Language | English Hungarian |
| Size | B5 |
| Year of Foundation |
2000 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
4 |
| Founder | Végeken Egézséglélektani Alapítvány |
| Founder's Address |
H-1089 Budapest, Hungary Nagyvárad tér 4. |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 1419-8126 (Print) |
| ISSN | 1786-3759 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2023 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Jul 2023 | 0 | 10 | 27 |
| Aug 2023 | 0 | 10 | 7 |
| Sep 2023 | 0 | 9 | 16 |
| Oct 2023 | 0 | 21 | 22 |
| Nov 2023 | 0 | 37 | 33 |
| Dec 2023 | 0 | 25 | 14 |
Authors:
, , , , , and
Authors:
, , , , , and
Authors:
, , , , , , , and
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory