Authors:
,
,
, and
Krisztina Kovács
kovacs.krisztina@tf.hu
Krisztina Kovács
Testnevelési Egyetem, Gazdaság és Társadalomtudományi Intézet, Pszichológia és Sportpszichológia Tanszék, Budapest, Magyarország
Budapest Honvéd Kosárlabda Akadémia, Budapest, Magyarország
Search for other papers by Krisztina Kovács in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Budapest Honvéd Kosárlabda Akadémia, Budapest, Magyarország
Search for other papers by Krisztina Kovács in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Kőnig-Görögh Dóra
Kőnig-Görögh Dóra
Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem Tanítóképző Főiskolai Kar, Budapest, Magyarország
Search for other papers by Kőnig-Görögh Dóra in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kőnig-Görögh Dóra in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Rita F. Földi
Rita F. Földi
Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, Pszichológiai Intézet, Budapest, Magyarország
Search for other papers by Rita F. Földi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rita F. Földi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Noémi Gyömbér
Noémi Gyömbér
Testnevelési Egyetem, Gazdaság és Társadalomtudományi Intézet, Pszichológia és Sportpszichológia Tanszék, Budapest, Magyarország
Search for other papers by Noémi Gyömbér in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Noémi Gyömbér in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Háttér és célkitűzések: Jelen tanulmány célja az Edzői Viselkedés Kérdőív (Coaching Behaviour Questionnaire) magyar változatának pszichometriai vizsgálata, a mérőeszköz reliabilitásának és validitásának ellenőrzése. Módszerek: A kérdőív érvényességét és megbízhatóságát egy 490 fős kényelmi mintán (234 férfi és 256 nő, átlagéletkor = 19,49 év; SD = 5,05 év) ellenőriztük. Az Edzői Viselkedés Kérdőív mellett felvételre került a Sportkörnyezet Kérdőív, a Sportmotiváció-2 Kérdőív, az Edző-Sportoló Kapcsolat Kérdőív, valamint a Sportverseny Pillanatnyi Szorongás Skála. Eredmények: A megerősítő faktoranalízis eredményeképpen az Edzői Viselkedés Kérdőív kétfaktoros elméleti modelljének illeszkedési mutatói megfelelőnek bizonyultak (χ 2 = 386,36;df = 89; TLI = 0,90; CFI = 0,91; RMSEA = 0,08 [90% CI = 0,07 – 0,09]; SRMR = 0,07). A kérdőív skáláinak belső megbízhatósága elfogadható (Negatív reakció Cronbach-α = 0,87, Támogatás Cronbach-α = 0,87). A konvergens validitás vizsgálata során a korábbi kutatásokkal megegyező korrelációkat kaptunk a Támogatás alskála és az észlelt autonómiatámogatás, az önbizalom, a sportmotiváció típusai és az edző-sportoló kapcsolat minősége között (r = –0,29 – 0,90; p < 0,001), a Negatív reakció alskála mindezeken a skálákon túl szignifikáns kapcsolatba hozható a sportolói állapotszorongással is (r = 0,21 – 0,25; p < 0,001). Következtetések: Az Edzői Viselkedés Kérdőív magyarra fordított változata pszichometriailag megfelelő mérőeszköznek tekinthető.
Background and aims: The purpose of the study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the Coaching Behaviour Questionnaire and examine the reliability and validity of this questionnaire. Methods: 432 athletes were involved in this study (mean age = 19.49; SD = 5.05; men = 234; women = 256). Besides the above-mentioned questionnaire, the Sport Climate Questionnaire, the Sport Motivation Scale-2, the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire, and the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 were applied for the validation. Results: The confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-dimensional theoretical model (χ 2 = 386.36;df = 89; TLI = 0.90; CFI = 0.91; RMSEA = 0.08 [90% CI = 0.07 – 0.09]; SRMR = 0.07), that indicated an acceptable fit to the data. Internal consistency of the subscales (Negative activation Cronbach’s α = 0.87, Supportiveness Cronbach’s α = 0.87) proved to be adequate. Examination of construct validity revealed positive relationships among Supportiveness subscale and self-determined motivation, autonomy-supported coach behaviour, self-confidence and coach-athlete relationship (r = – 0.29 – 0.70), and negative relationship among the Negative activation and the trait anxiety in addition to the below mentioned scales (r = 0.21 – 0.25). Discussion: The Hungarian version of the CBQ seems to be a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
Baker, J ., Côté, J ., & Hawes, R . (2000). The relationship between coaching behaviours and sport anxiety in athletes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 3(2), 110–119.
-
Bebetsos, E ., Filippou, F ., & Bebetsos, G . (2017). Athletes′ criticism of coaching behavior: differences among gender, and type of sport. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 25(1), 55–67.
-
Cohen, J . (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
-
Davis, L ., & Jowett, S . (2014). Coach–athlete attachment and the quality of the coach–athlete relationship: implications for athlete’s well-being. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32(15), 1454–1464.
-
Deci, E. L . (2001). The sport climate questionnaire. Letöltve: 2019. 10. 08-án: http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/pas-sport-climate/
-
Deci, E. L ., & Ryan, R. M . (2000). The ”what” and ”why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
-
Felton, L ., & Jowett, S . (2015). On understanding the role of need thwarting in the association between athlete attachment and well/ill-being. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 25(2), 289–298.
-
Fornell, C ., & Larcker, D. F . (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
-
Géczi, G ., Tóth, L ., Sipos, K ., Fügedi, B ., Dancs, H ., & Bognár, J . (2009). Psychological profile of Hungarian national young ice hockey players. Kinesiology, 41(1), 88-96.
-
Grant, A. M . (2014). Autonomy support, relationship satisfaction and goal focus in the coach–coachee relationship: which best predicts coaching success? Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 7(1), 18–38.
-
Gyömbér, N ., Kovács, K ., & Ruzits, É . (2016). Gyereklélek sportcipőben. Budapest: Noran Libro Kiadó
-
Hair, J. F ., Black, W. C ., Babin, B. J ., Anderson, R. E ., & Tatham, R. L . (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
-
Hu, L ., & Bentler, P M . (1999). Cut-off criteria for indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6(1), 1–55.
-
Jowett, S . (2009). Validating coach-athlete relationship measures with the nomological network. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 13(1), 34–51.
-
Jowett, S . (2017). Coaching effectiveness: The coach–athlete relationship at its heart. Current Opinion in Psychology, 16, 154–158.
-
Jowett, S ., & Cockerill, I. M . (2003). Olympic medallists’ perspective of the athlete–coach relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(4), 313–331.
-
Jowett, S ., & Meek, G. A . (2000). The coach-athlete relationship in married couples: An exploratory content analysis. The Sport Psychologist, 14(2), 157–175.
-
Jowett, S ., & Nezlek, J . (2012). Relationship interdependence and satisfaction with important outcomes in coach–athlete dyads. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(3), 287–301.
-
Jowett, S ., & Ntoumanis, N . (2004). The coach–athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q): Development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 14(4), 245–257.
-
Jowett, S ., & Poczwardowski, A . (2007). Understanding the Coach-Athlete Relationship. In S. Jowett , & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (3–14). Champaign: Human Kinetics
-
Jowett, S ., Adie, J. W ., Bartholomew, K. J ., Yang, S. X ., Gustafsson, H ., & Lopez-Jiménez, A . (2017). Motivational processes in the coach-athlete relationship: A multi-cultural self-determination approach. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 32, 143–152.
-
Karamousalidis, G ., Galazoulas, C ., Mousaridou, E ., Bebetsos, E ., Grammatikopoulou, M ., & Alexaki, A . (2010). Relation of coaching behavior and role ambiguity. Journal of Physical Education & Sport/Citius Altius Fortius, 28(3), 45–50.
-
Kasuba, M . (2018). Az edző–sportoló kapcsolat egy labdarúgó akadémián. Educatio, 27(1), 121–128.
-
Kelley, H. H ., & Thibaut, J. W . (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley
-
Kenow, L. J ., & Williams, J. M . (1992). Relationship between anxiety, self-confidence, and evaluation of coaching behaviors. The Sport Psychologist, 6(4), 344–357.
-
Kenow, L. J ., & Williams, J. M . (1993). Factor structure of the coaching behavior questionnaire and its relationship to anxiety and self-confidence. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(4), 377–396.
-
Kenow, L ., & Williams, J. M . (1999). Coach-athlete compatibility and athlete’s perception of coaching behaviors. Journal of Sport Behaviour, 22(2), 251–259.
-
Kiss, Z ., Fózer-Selmeci, B ., Csáki, I ., & Bognár, J . (2015). Bentlakó labdarúgó-korosztályok pszichés-mentális jellemzői, Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, 16(4), 331–347.
-
Kovács, K ., F. Földi, R ., & Gyömbér, N . (2021). Az Edző-Sportoló Kapcsolat Kérdőív hazai adaptációja, a sportoló szemszögén keresztül. Magyar Sporttudományi Szemle, 22(90), 12–20.
-
Kovács, K ., Gyömbér, N ., F. Földi, R ., & Lénárt, Á . (2020). Észlelt autonómia támogatás kérdőívek hazai adaptációja, Alkalmazott Pszichológia 20(1), 103–119.
-
Kovács, K ., Gyömbér, N ., Kelemen, Á ., & Földi, R. F . (2019). Az észlelt autonómiatámogatás hatása a teljesítéscélokra karate utánpótláskorosztályoknál. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 74(2), 163–180.
-
Lafrenière, M. A. K ., Jowett, S ., Vallerand, R. J ., & Carbonneau, N . (2011). Passion for coaching and the quality of the coach–athlete relationship: The mediating role of coaching behaviors. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(2), 144–152.
-
Ledochowski, L ., Unterrainer, C ., Ruedl, G ., Schnitzer, M ., & Kopp, M . (2012). Quality of life, coach behaviour and competitive anxiety in Winter Youth Olympic Games participants. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 46(15), 1044–1047.
-
Lee, H. W ., Magnusen, M. J ., & Cho, S . (2013). Strength coach-athlete compatibility: Roles of coaching behaviors and athlete gender. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 25(1), 55–67.
-
Mageau, G. A ., & Vallerand, R. J . (2003). The coach–athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of Sports Science, 21(11), 883–904.
-
Mavridis, G ., Rokka, S ., Filippou, F ., Mavridis, K ., Masadis, G ., & Bebetsos, E . (2019). Investigating the coaching behavior and basic psychological needs among junior basketball players. Conference paper: International Scientific Congress “Applied Sports Sciences” and The Balkan Scientific Congress “Physical Education, Sports, Health”. Letöltve: 2021. 11. 13-án: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341354042_Investigating_the_Coaching_behavior_and_Basic_Psychological_Needs_among_Junior_Basketball_players/citations
-
Paic, R ., Kajos, A ., Meszler, B ., & Prisztóka, Gy . (2018). A Magyar nyelvű sportmotivációs skála (H-SMS) validációja és eredményei, Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 73(2), 159–182.
-
Pelletier, L. G ., Rocchi, M. A ., Vallerand, R. J ., Deci, E. L ., & Ryan, R. M . (2013). Validation of the revised Sport Motivation Scale (SMS-II). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(3), 329–341.
-
Révész, L ., Bognár, J ., Csáki, I ., & Trzaskoma-Bicsérdy, G . (2013). Az edző-sportoló kapcsolat vizsgálata az úszás sportágban. Magyar Pedagógia, 113(1), 53–72.
-
Sarı, İ ., & Bayazıt, B . (2017). The relationship between perceived coaching behaviours, motivation and self-efficacy in wrestlers. Journal of Human Kinetics, 57(1), 239–251.
-
Shanmugam, V ., Jowett, S ., & Meyer, C . (2012). Eating psychopathology amongst athletes: Links to current attachment styles. Eating Behaviors, 13(1), 5–12.
-
Sipos, K ., Bejek, K ., & Kudar, K . (1999). A magyar nyelvű CSAI-2 versenyszorongás skála sztenderdizálása. In: Mónus A . (szerk.) III. Országos Sporttudományi Kongresszus, II. kötet (293 –299). Budapest: Magyar Sporttudományi Társaság
-
Smith, R. E ., Smoll, F. L ., & Hunt, E . (1977). A system for the behavioral assessment of athletic coaches. Research Quarterly. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 48(2), 401–407.
-
Smohai, M ., Szemes, Á ., Bernhardt-Torma, N ., Mirnics, Zs ., Bóna, K ., Kovács, K ., et al. (kézirat). A Sportmotivációs Kérdőív (SMS-II) magyar változatának pszichometriai jellemzői.
-
Smoll, F. L ., & Smith, R. E . (1989). Leadership behaviors in sport: A theoretical model and research paradigm 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(18), 1522–1551.
-
Solomon, G . (2008). Expectations and perceptions as predictors of coaches’ feedback in three competitive contexts. Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education, 2(2), 161–179.
-
Taber, K. S . (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296.
-
Williams, J. M ., Kenow, L. J ., Jerome, G. J ., Rogers, T ., Sartain, T. A ., & Darland, G . (2003). Factor structure of the coaching behavior questionnaire and its relationship to athlete variables. The Sport Psychologist, 17(1), 16–34.
-
Yang, S. X ., Jowett, S ., & Chan, D. K. C . (2015). Effects of big-five personality traits on the quality of relationship and satisfaction in Chinese coach–athlete dyads. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 25(4), 568–580.
-
Zourbanos, N ., Hatzigeorgiadis, A ., Tsiakaras, N ., Chroni, S ., & Theodorakis, Y . (2010). A multimethod examination of the relationship between coaching behavior and athletes’ inherent self-talk. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(6), 764–785.
Editorial Correspondence: Czeglédi, Edit
Institute of Behavioural Sciences
Semmelweis University
Nagyvárad tér 4.
H-1089 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 210 2930 ext. 56151 ---- Fax: (36 1) 210 2955
E-mail: mentalhigiene.pszichoszomatika@gmail.com
Indexing and Abstracting Services:
- PsychInfo
- SCOPUS
- CABELLS Journalytics
| 2023 | |
|---|---|
| Scopus | |
| CiteScore | 0.6 |
| CiteScore rank | Q4 (Psychiatry and Mental Health) |
| SNIP | 0.149 |
| Scimago | |
| SJR index | 0.141 |
| SJR Q rank | Q4 |
| Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika | |
|---|---|
| Publication Model | Online Only Hybrid |
| Submission Fee | none |
| Article Processing Charge | 900 EUR/article |
| Printed Color Illustrations | 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece |
| Regional discounts on country of the funding agency | World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50% World Bank Low-income economies: 100% |
| Further Discounts | Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50% Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100% |
| Subscription fee 2025 | Online subsscription: 120 EUR / 132 USD |
| Subscription Information | Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content. |
| Purchase per Title | Individual articles are sold on the displayed price. |
| Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika | |
|---|---|
| Language | English Hungarian |
| Size | B5 |
| Year of Foundation |
2000 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
4 |
| Founder | Végeken Egészséglélektani Alapítvány |
| Founder's Address |
H-1089 Budapest, Hungary Nagyvárad tér 4. |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 1419-8126 (Print) |
| ISSN | 1786-3759 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2024 | 0 | 23 | 5 |
| Sep 2024 | 0 | 69 | 21 |
| Oct 2024 | 0 | 208 | 26 |
| Nov 2024 | 0 | 243 | 95 |
| Dec 2024 | 0 | 249 | 38 |
| Jan 2025 | 0 | 57 | 43 |
| Feb 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Authors:
, , , , , and
Authors:
, , , , , and
Authors:
, , , , , , , and
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory