Authors:
Viola Sallay Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Pszichológiai Intézet, Szeged, Magyarország

Search for other papers by Viola Sallay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1326-1704
,
Orsolya Rosta-Filep Semmelweis Egyetem, Doktori Iskola, Budapest, Magyarország

Search for other papers by Orsolya Rosta-Filep in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7823-9439
,
Dóra Vajda Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Pszichológiai Intézet, Szeged, Magyarország
Pszichoszomatikus Ambulancia, Budapest, Magyarország

Search for other papers by Dóra Vajda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9131-4421
,
Anna Dorka Kocsis Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Pszichológiai Intézet, Szeged, Magyarország

Search for other papers by Anna Dorka Kocsis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Tamás Martos Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Pszichológiai Intézet, Szeged, Magyarország

Search for other papers by Tamás Martos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5946-1299
Open access

ABSZTRAKT

Elméleti háttér: A célok egyéni szintű konstruktumok, amelyek az önszabályozás és a jóllét fontos tényezői. A párkapcsolati partnerek céljai emellett egyetlen önszabályozó rendszerként is értelmezhetők. Cél: Az egyéni és a közös célok három jellemzőjének vizsgálata (a célok közösként való elismerése, a célokkal kapcsolatos pozitív élmények, és a közös páros megküzdés), illetve ezek összefüggéseinek feltárása a párkapcsolati elégedettséggel. Módszerek: A keresztmetszeti, kérdőíves vizsgálat résztvevői házas és együtt élő heteroszexuális párok voltak (n = 270 pár; átlagéletkor: 40,1 [SD = 11,2] év és 37,8 [SD = 10,9] év a férfi és női partnereknél). Mérőeszközök: Személyes Terv Kérdőív (a terv közös voltára, a közös pozitív élményekre és a közös páros megküzdésre vonatkozó kérdésekkel), Kapcsolati Elégedettség Skála (RAS-H). Eredmények: A többváltozós elemzésekben az összefüggéseket kontrolláltuk az életkorra, a párkapcsolati státuszra, a párkapcsolat hosszára és a válaszadók szubjektív anyagi helyzetére. Az útelemzés eredményei szerint a partnerek saját terveinek három közös jellemzője egymással összefüggő rendszert alkot. Minél inkább közösnek tekintik a partnerek a személyes terveiket, annál inkább alkalmaznak közös megküzdési stratégiákat a stressz kezelésére (β = 0,37 és 0,35; p < 0,001; a férfi és a női partnernél), és annál több pozitív élményt is élnek át a tervvel kapcsolatban (β = 0,40 és 0,41; p < 0,001; a férfi és a női partnernél). A párkapcsolati elégedettség előrejelzésére felállított aktor– partner interdependencia modell eredményei alapján pedig azt találtuk, hogy az elégedettséget elsősorban a saját közös páros megküzdés jelzi előre mindkét partnernél (β = 0,24 és 0,43; p < 0,001; a férfi és a női partnernél), illetve a férfiak kapcsolati elégedettségét előre jelezte a partnerük közös páros megküzdése is (β = 0,29; p < 0,001). Következtetések: Eredményeink arra utalnak, hogy a személyes tervek „kapcsolati beágyazottsága” létező és jelentős párkapcsolati tapasztalat, amelynek része a terv közösként való értékelésének kognitív, affektív és viselkedéses komponense is. A párkapcsolati elégedettség azonban elsősorban a viselkedésbeli megnyilvánulással, azaz a közös megküzdés tapasztalatával függ össze.

  • Avivi, Y. E., Laurenceau, J.-P., & Carver, C. S. (2009). Linking relationship quality to perceived mutuality of relationship goals and perceived goal progress. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 137164.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping: A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. Revue Européene de Psychologie Appliquée, 47(2), 137140.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bodenmann, G. (2008). DCI: Dyadisches Coping Inventar. Verlag Hans Huber

  • Bodenmann, G., Pihet, S., & Kayser, K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(3), 485493.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brunstein, J. C., Dangelmayer, G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (1996). Personal goals and social support in close relationships: Effects on relationship mood and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 10061019.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Fulford, D. (2008). Self-regulatory processes, stress, and coping. In: Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 725742.). The Guilford Press

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The Actor–Partner Inter-dependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in develop-mental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 101109.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Corra, M., Carter, S. K., Carter, J. S., & Knox, D. (2009). Trends in Marital Happiness by Gender and Race, 1973 to 2006. Journal of Family Issues, 30(10), 13791404.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dailey, R. M. (2018). Exploring the role of the romantic relationship context in weight loss. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(5), 679701.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to per-sonality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 10581068.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Emmons, R. A. (1991). Personal strivings, daily life events, and psychological and physical well-being. Journal of Personality, 59(3), 453472.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 2846.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Falconier, M. K., & Kuhn, R. (2019). Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 571.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Finkel, E. J., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2011). The effects of social relationships on self-regulation. In: K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (Vol. 2, pp. 390406). Guilford Press

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Finkel, E. J., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2021). Goal transactivity. In: P. A. M. Van Lange, E. T. Higgins, & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology handbook of basic principles (3rd ed., pp. 202221.). Guilford Press

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fishbach, A., & Tu, Y. (2016). Pursuing goals with others. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(5), 298312.

  • Fitzsimons, G. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). The effects of selfregulation on social relationships. In: K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (Vol. 2, pp. 407421.). Guilford Press

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & vanDellen, M. R. (2015). Transactive goal dynamics. Psychological Review, 122(4), 648673.

  • Fowers, B. J., & Applegate, B. (1996). Marital satisfaction and conventionalization examined dyadically. Current Psychology, 15(3), 197214.

  • Fowers, B. J., & Owenz, M. B. (2010). A eudaimonic theory of mar-ital quality. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(4), 334352.

  • Gere, J., Almeida, D. M., & Martire, L. M. (2016). The effects of lack of joint goal planning on divorce over 10 years. PLOS ONE, 11(9), Article e0163543.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfac-tion. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50(1), 9398.

  • Hilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Sorokowski, P., Atkins, D. C., Sorokowska, A., Ahmadi, K., et al. (2016). The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: A 35-nation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1106.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoppmann, C. A., Poetter, U., & Klumb, P. L. (2013). Dyadic conflict in goal-relevant activities affects well-being and psychological functioning in employed parents: Evidence from daily time-samples. Time & Society, 22(3), 356370.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidis-ciplinary Journal, 6(1), 155.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huston, T. L., Caughlin, J. P., Houts, R. M., Smith, S. E., & George, L. J. (2001). The connubial crucible: Newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 237252.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnson, M. D., Anderson, J. R., Walker, A., Wilcox, A., Lewis, V. L., & Robbins, D. C. (2013). Common dyadic coping is indirectly related to dietary and exercise adherence via patient and partner diabetes efficacy. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5), 722730.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaplan, M., & Maddux, J. E. (2002). Goals and marital satisfaction: perceived support for personal goals and collective efficacy for collective goals. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21(2), 157164.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kornblum, A., Unger, D., & Grote, G. (2021). How romantic relationships affect individual career goal attainment: A trans-active goal dynamics perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 125, Article 103523.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 863.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lemay, E. P., & Clark, M. S. (2008). How the head liberates the heart: Projection of communal responsiveness guides relation-ship promotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 647671.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lemay, E. P., & Neal, A. M. (2014). Accurate and biased perceptions of responsive support predict well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 38(2), 270286.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liefbroer, A. C., & Dourleijn, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography, 43(2), 203221.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Little, B. R. (2006). Personality science and self-regulation: Per-sonal projects as integrative units. Applied Psychology, 55(3), 419427.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Little, B. R. (2015). The integrative challenge in personality science: Personal projects as units of analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 93101.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martos, J., Sallay, V., Szabó, E., Tóth-Vajna, R., & Martos, T. (2018). Diádikus stressz és megküzdés–elméleti modellek és alkalma-zások. Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, 19(1), 3354.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martos, T. (2009). Célok, tervek, törekvések I. Elméleti megfonto-lások és alkalmazási lehetőségek. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 64(2), 337358.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martos, T., Sallay, V., Nagy, M., Gregus, H., & Filep, O. (2019). Stress and dyadic coping in personal projects of couples–A pattern-oriented analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 400.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martos, T., Sallay, V., Nistor, M., & Józsa, P. (2012). Párkapcsolati megküzdés és jóllét–A Páros Megküzdés Kérdőív magyar vál-tozata. Psychiatria Hungarica, 27(6), 446458.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martos, T., Sallay V., Szabó T., Lakatos C., & Tóth-Vajna R. (2014). Psychometric characteristics of the Hungarian version of the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS-H). Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, 15(3), 245258.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martos, T., Szabó, E., Koren, R., & Sallay, V. (2021). Dyadic coping in personal projects of romantic partners: Assessment and associations with relationship satisfaction. Current Psychology, 40(6), 29562969.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276282. https://hrcak.srce.hr/89395

  • Meegan, S. P., & Goedereis, E. A. (2006). Life task appraisals, spouse involvement in strategies, and daily affect among short-and long-term married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(2), 319327.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meier, F., Notari, S. C., Bodenmann, G., Revenson, T. A., & Favez, N. (2019). We are in this together — Aren’t we? Congruence of common dyadic coping and psychological distress of couples facing breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 28(12), 23742381.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Messersmith, E. E., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2010). Goal attainment, goal striving, and well-being during the transition to adult-hood: A ten-year U.S. national longitudinal study. New Direc-tions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2010, 2740.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Papp, L. M., & Witt, N. L. (2010). Romantic partners’ individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: Implications for relation-ship functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(5), 551559.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ranta, M., Dietrich, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2014). Career and romantic relationship goals and concerns during emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 2(1), 1726.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rentscher, K. E. (2019). Communal coping in couples with health problems. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 398.

  • Riediger, M., & Rauers, A. (2010). The ‘I know you’ and the ‘You know me’ of mutual goal knowledge in partnerships: Dif-ferential associations with partnership satisfaction and sense of closeness over time. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 647656.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosta-Filep, O., Sallay, V., Carbonneau, N., & Martos, T. (2022). Cooperation and conflict in romantic partners’ personal projects: The role of life domains. Current Psychology.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 351375.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2008). Why we need interdependence theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 20492070.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Salmela-Aro, K., Nurmi, J.-E., Saisto, T., & Halmesmäki, E. (2010). Spousal support for personal goals and relationship satisfaction among women during the transition to parenthood. Inter-national Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(3), 229237.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sanderson, C. A., & Cantor, N. (2001). The association of intimacy goals and marital satisfaction: A test of four mediational hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(12), 15671577.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schindler, I., Berg, C. A., Butler, J. M., Fortenberry, K. T., & Wiebe, D. J. (2010). Late-midlife and older couples’ shared possible selves and psychological well-being during times of illness: The role of collaborative problem solving. The Journals of Geronto-logy Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65B(4), 416424.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ungar, N., Michalowski, V. I., Baehring, S., Pauly, T., Gerstorf, D., Ashe, M. C., et al. (2021). Joint goals in older couples: as-sociations with goal progress, allostatic load, and relationship satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 623037.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand

 

Submit Your Manuscript
 
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE
Instructions for reviews in Hungarian HERE
 
 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Adrienne STAUDER

Editor(s): Edit CZEGLÉDI

Editorial Board

  • László Csaba DÉGI (Babeş-Bolyai Tudományegyetem, Kolozsvár, Románia)
  • Zsolt DEMETROVICS (Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest)
  • Barna KONKOLŸ THEGE (Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, Canada)
  • Karolina KÓSA (University of Debrecen, Debrecen)
  • Márta NOVÁK (University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada)
  • Bettina PIKÓ (University of Szeged, Szeged)
  • József RÁCZ (Semmelweis University, Budapest; Eötvös University, Budapest)
  • István TIRINGER (University of Pécs, Pécs)

Editorial Correspondence: Czeglédi, Edit
Institute of Behavioural Sciences
Semmelweis University
Nagyvárad tér 4.
H-1089 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 210 2930 ext. 56151 ---- Fax: (36 1) 210 2955
E-mail: mentalhigiene.pszichoszomatika@gmail.com

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • PsychInfo
  • SCOPUS
  • CABELLS Journalytics

 

2022  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
not indexed
Journal Impact Factor not indexed
Rank by Impact Factor

not indexed
not indexed

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
not indexed
5 Year
Impact Factor
not indexed
Journal Citation Indicator not indexed
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

not indexed
not indexed

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
15
Scimago
Journal Rank
0.165
Scimago Quartile Score

Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology Q4

Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
0.7
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Psychiatry and Mental Health 441/531 (17th PCTL)
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 61/68 (11th PCTL)
Scopus
SNIP
0.361

2021  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
not indexed
Journal Impact Factor not indexed
Rank by Impact Factor

not indexed

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
not indexed
5 Year
Impact Factor
not indexed
Journal Citation Indicator not indexed
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

not indexed

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
13
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,127
Scimago Quartile Score Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (Q4)
Psychiatry and Mental Health (Q4)
Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
0,3
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Psychiatry and Mental Health 485/529 (Q4)
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 62/65 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,106

2020  
Scimago
H-index
11
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,15
Scimago
Quartile Score
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology Q4
Psychiatry and Mental Health Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
23/67=0,3
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 57/60 (Q4)
Psychiatry and Mental Health 452/502 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,24
Scopus
Cites
77
Scopus
Documents
14
Days from submission to acceptance 140
Days from acceptance to publication 90

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
10
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,127
Scimago
Quartile Score
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology Q4
Psychiatry and Mental Health Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
26/70=0,4
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 59/61 (Q4)
Psychiatry and Mental Health 442/506 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,135
Scopus
Cites
67
Scopus
Documents
18

 

Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika
Publication Model Online Only Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2023 Online subsscription: 104 EUR / 128 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika
Language English
Hungarian
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
2000
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Végeken Egézséglélektani Alapítvány
Founder's
Address
H-1089 Budapest, Hungary Nagyvárad tér 4.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1419-8126 (Print)
ISSN 1786-3759 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Dec 2023 0 114 66
Jan 2024 0 134 32
Feb 2024 0 121 28
Mar 2024 0 55 47
Apr 2024 0 216 42
May 2024 0 72 24
Jun 2024 0 0 0