This paper investigates the "discourse-configurationality" hypothesis in Hungarian, based on the current assumption that Hungarian sentence structure is largely determined by information structure. It argues for the necessity of differentiating between the notion of topic, defined on a pragmatic level with respect to possible contexts, and the notion of logical subject, defined on a decontextualized logico-semantic level. On the basis of the distinction between these two levels of sentence analysis, Hungarian should be taken as a logical subject-prominent language rather than a topic-prominent one. As for the so-called contrastive topic in Hungarian, only a subclass of contrastive topic expressions meets the topicality conditions established in this paper on a pragmatic ground, and other types of contrastive topic expressions, namely those that can hardly be differentiated from ordinary topics, display the properties of logical subjects rather than topics.
Brentano, Franz 1973. Psychology from an empirical point of view. Routledge, London. Translated by Antos Rancurello, D. B. Terrell and Linda McAlister from Psychologische vom empirischen Standpunkt (1874/1924).
Psychology from an empirical point of view. Routledge, London , () 1874/1924 .
Cadiot, Pierre 1988. Le thˆme comme synecdoque. In: Langue Franˆaise78: 9-26.
'Le thˆme comme synecdoque ' () 78 Langue Franˆaise : 9 -26 .
De Cat, Cécile 2002. French dislocation. Doctoral dissertation, University of York.
É. Kiss, Katalin 2000. The syntax of Hungarian. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
The syntax of Hungarian , ().
Gyuris, Beáta 2002. The semantics of contrastive topic in Hungarian. Doctoral dissertation, ELTE, Budapest.
É. Kiss, Katalin 1994. Sentence structure and word order. In: Katalin É. Kiss - Ferenc Kiefer (eds): The syntactic structure of Hungarian (Syntax and semantics 27), 1-90. Academic Press, New York.
Sentence structure and word order , () 1 -90 .
É. Kiss, Katalin 1998. Mondattan [Syntax]. In: Katalin É. Kiss - Ferenc Kiefer - Péter Siptár: Új magyar nyelvtan [A new Hungarian grammar], 15 184. Osiris Kiadó, Budapest.
Mondattan [Syntax] , () 184 .
É. Kiss, Katalin - Beáta Gyuris 2003. Apparent scope inversion under the rise fall contour. In: Acta Linguistica Hungarica50: 371-404.
'Apparent scope inversion under the rise fall contour ' () 50 Acta Linguistica Hungarica : 371 -404 .
Enˆ, Mürvet 1991. The semantics of specificity. In: Linguistic Inquiry22: 1-25.
'The semantics of specificity ' () 22 Linguistic Inquiry : 1 -25 .
É. Kiss, Katalin 2000. A [+ referáló] és [+ specifikus] jegyek ellenőrzése a kontrasztív topik esetében [The checking of [+ referential] and [+ specific] features in the case of contrastive topic]. In: László Büky - Márta Maleczki (eds): A mai magyar nyelv leírásának újabb módszerei IV [Recent methods in the description of contemporary Hungarian 4], 85-96. JATEPress, Szeged.
A [+ referáló] és [+ specifikus] jegyek ellenőrzése a kontrasztív topik esetében [The checking of [+ referential] and [+ specific] features in the case of contrastive topic] , () 85 -96 .
Gécseg, Zsuzsanna 2001. A kontrasztív topik szintaxisáról és szemantikájáról [On the syntax and semantics of contrastive topic]. In: Magyar Nyelv97: 283-292; 423-431.
'A kontrasztív topik szintaxisáról és szemantikájáról [On the syntax and semantics of contrastive topic] ' () 97 Magyar Nyelv : 283 -292 .
Gécseg, Zsuzsanna forthcoming. A magyar és a francia mondat tagolásának alapelvei / Les principes de l'articulation de la phrase assertive dans le hongrois et dans le franˆais parlé. In: Ilona Kassai (ed.): A francia és a magyar mondat információs szerkezete / Structure informationnelle de la phrase franˆaise et de la phrase hongroise. Lharmattan & Tinta Kiadó, Budapest.
A magyar és a francia mondat tagolásának alapelvei / Les principes de l'articulation de la phrase assertive dans le hongrois et dans le franˆais parlé , ().
Gécseg, Zsuzsanna - Ferenc Kiefer forthcoming. A new look at information structure in Hungarian. In: Linguistics.
A new look at information structure in Hungarian , ().
Kálmán, László 2001. Magyar leíró nyelvtan. Mondattan I (Segédkönyvek a nyelvészet tanulmányozásához VI) [Hungarian descriptive grammar. Syntax 1 (Supplementary textbooks on linguistics 6)]. Tinta Kiadó, Budapest.
Magyar leíró nyelvtan. Mondattan I (Segédkönyvek a nyelvészet tanulmányozásához VI) [Hungarian descriptive grammar. Syntax 1 (Supplementary textbooks on linguistics 6)] , ().
Kiefer, Ferenc 1977. Functional sentence perspective and presuppositions. In: Acta Linguistica Hungarica27: 83-109.
'Functional sentence perspective and presuppositions ' () 27 Acta Linguistica Hungarica : 83 -109 .
Kuno, Sosumo 1972. Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. In: Linguistic Inquiry3: 269-320.
'Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English ' () 3 Linguistic Inquiry : 269 -320 .
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki 1972. The categoric and thetic judgment: Evidence from Japanese syntax. In: Foundations of Language9: 153-85.
'The categoric and thetic judgment: Evidence from Japanese syntax ' () 9 Foundations of Language : 153 -85 .
Lambrecht, Knut 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Information structure and sentence form , ().
Maleczki, Márta 2001. Indefinite arguments in Hungarian. In: István Kenesei (ed.): Argument structure in Hungarian, 157-99. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
Indefinite arguments in Hungarian , () 157 -99 .
Marty, Anton 1918. Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. II., part 1. Abteilung. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Halle.
Gesammelte Schriften , ().
Molnár, Valéria 1998. Topic in focus: The syntax, phonology, semantics and pragmatics of the so-called "contrastive topic" in Hungarian and German. In: Acta Linguistica Hungarica45: 89-166.
'Topic in focus: The syntax, phonology, semantics and pragmatics of the so-called "contrastive topic" in Hungarian and German ' () 45 Acta Linguistica Hungarica : 89 -166 .
Maleczki, Márta 2003. Information structure, argument structure and typological variation. In: Katarzyna Jaszczolt - Ken Turner (eds): Meaning through language contrast, 223-44. John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia.
Information structure, argument structure and typological variation , () 223 -44 .
Szabolcsi, Anna 1997. Strategies for scope taking. In: Anna Szabolesi (ed.): Ways of scope taking (SLAP 65), 109-155. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Strategies for scope taking , () 109 -155 .
Varga, László 1987. Hozzászólás egy hangsúly-tanulmányhoz [Remarks on a prosody study]. In: Nyelvtudományi Közlemények89: 53-66.
'Hozzászólás egy hangsúly-tanulmányhoz [Remarks on a prosody study] ' () 89 Nyelvtudományi Közlemények : 53 -66 .