View More View Less
  • 1 University of Potsdam Department of Linguistics Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25 14476 Golm Germany
Full access

In a first step, definitions of the irreducible information structural categories are given, and in a second step, it is shown that there are no invariant phonological or otherwise grammatical correlates of these categories. In other words, the phonology, syntax or morphology are unable to define information structure. It is a common mistake that information structural categories are expressed by invariant grammatical correlates, be they syntactic, morphological or phonological. It is rather the case that grammatical cues help speaker and hearer to sort out which element carries which information structural role, and only in this sense are the grammatical correlates of information structure important. Languages display variation as to the role of grammar in enhancing categories of information structure, and this variation reflects the variation found in the “normal” syntax and phonology of languages.

  • Cinque, Guglielmo 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. In: Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239–297.

    Cinque G. , 'A null theory of phrase and compound stress ' (1993 ) 24 Linguistic Inquiry : 239 -297.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Clark, Herbert H. — Susan E. Haviland 1977. Comprehension and the given-new contrast. In: Roy O. Freedle (ed.): Discourse production and comprehension, 1–40. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ.

    Haviland S. E. , '', in Discourse production and comprehension , (1977 ) -.

  • É. Kiss, Katalin 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. In: Language 74: 245–273.

    Katalin , 'Identificational focus versus information focus ' (1998 ) 74 Language : 245 -273.

  • É. Kiss, Katalin 2008. Topic and focus: Two structural positions associated with logical functions in the left periphery of the Hungarian sentence. In: Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 287–296.

    Katalin , 'Topic and focus: Two structural positions associated with logical functions in the left periphery of the Hungarian sentence ' (2008 ) 55 Acta Linguistica Hungarica : 287 -296.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Endriss, Cornelia — Stefan Hinterwimmer 2008. Direct and indirect aboutness topics. In: Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 297–307.

    Hinterwimmer S. , 'Direct and indirect aboutness topics ' (2008 ) 55 Acta Linguistica Hungarica : 297 -307.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Féry, Caroline — Shinichiro Ishihara 2006. Interpreting second occurrence focus. In: Christopher Davis — Amy Rose Deal — Youri Zabbal (eds): Proceedings of NELS 36, 371–384. GLSA, Amherst MA.

    Ishihara S. , '', in Proceedings of NELS , (2006 ) -.

  • Féry, Caroline — Shinichiro Ishihara to appear. How focus and givenness shape prosody. In: Zimmermann — Féry (to appear).

  • Féry, Caroline — Vieri Samek-Lodovici 2006. Focus projection and prosodic prominence in nested foci. In: Language 82: 131–150.

    Samek-Lodovici V. , 'Focus projection and prosodic prominence in nested foci ' (2006 ) 82 Language : 131 -150.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Fiedler, Ines — Katharina Hartmann — Brigitte Reineke — Anne Schwarz — Malte Zimmermann to appear. Subject focus in West African languages. In: Zimmermann-Féry (to appear).

  • Bartels, Christine 1997. Towards a compositional interpretation of English statement and question intonation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Bartels C. , '', in Doctoral dissertation , (1997 ) -.

  • Baumann, Stefan 2006. The intonation of givenness. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Baumann S. , '', in The intonation of givenness , (2006 ) -.

  • Baumann, Stefan — Martine Grice 2006. The intonation of accessibility. In: Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1636–1657.

    Grice M. , 'The intonation of accessibility ' (2006 ) 38 Journal of Pragmatics : 1636 -1657.

  • Beaver, David — Brady Zack Clark — Edward Flemming — T. Florian Jäger — Maria Wolters 2007. When semantics meets phonetics: Acoustical studies of second occurrence focus. In: Language 83: 245–276.

    Wolters M. , 'When semantics meets phonetics: Acoustical studies of second occurrence focus ' (2007 ) 83 Language : 245 -276.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Beckman, Mary E. — Janet B. Pierrehumbert 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. In: Phonology Yearbook 3: 255–309.

    Pierrehumbert J. B. , 'Intonational structure in Japanese and English ' (1986 ) 3 Phonology Yearbook : 255 -309.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Bolinger, Dwight 1958. A theory of pitch accent in English. In: Word 14: 109–149.

    Bolinger D. , 'A theory of pitch accent in English ' (1958 ) 14 Word : 109 -149.

  • Büring, Daniel 2003. On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. In: Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 511–545.

    Büring D. , 'On D-trees, beans, and B-accents ' (2003 ) 26 Linguistics and Philosophy : 511 -545.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In: Charles N. Li (ed.): Subject and topic, 27–55. Academic Press, New York.

    Chafe W. L. , '', in Subject and topic , (1976 ) -.

  • Frey, Werner 2004. The grammar-pragmatics interface and the German prefield. In: Sprache und Pragmatik 52: 1–39.

    Frey W. , 'The grammar-pragmatics interface and the German prefield ' (2004 ) 52 Sprache und Pragmatik : 1 -39.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Frota, Sónia 2000. Prosody and focus in European Portuguese. Garland, New York.

    Frota S. , '', in Prosody and focus in European Portuguese , (2000 ) -.

  • Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood 1967–1968. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. In: Journal of Linguistics 3: 37–81; 3: 199–244; 4: 179–215.

    Kirkwood A. , 'Notes on transitivity and theme in English ' (1967 ) 3 Journal of Linguistics : 37 -81.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Hartmann, Katharina 2008. Focus and tone. In: Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 415–426.

    Hartmann K. , 'Focus and tone ' (2008 ) 55 Acta Linguistica Hungarica : 415 -426.

  • Höhle, Tilmann N. 1991. Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. In: Joachim Jacobs (ed.): Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, Sonderheft der Linguistischen Berichte , 112–141. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.

    Höhle T. N. , '', in Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, Sonderheft der Linguistischen Berichte , (1991 ) -.

  • Hörnig, Robin — Caroline Féry 2007. Describing altered spatial layouts. Manuscript. Potsdam.

    Féry C. , '', in Describing altered spatial layouts , (2007 ) -.

  • Horvath, Julia 1986. Focus in the theory of grammar and the syntax of Hungarian. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Horvath J. , '', in Focus in the theory of grammar and the syntax of Hungarian , (1986 ) -.

  • Hyman, Larry — Maria Polinsky to appear. Is there a focus position in Aghem? In: Zimmermann — Féry (to appear).

  • Jackendoff, Ray 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Jackendoff R. , '', in Semantic interpretation in generative grammar , (1972 ) -.

  • Jacobs, Joachim 2001. The dimensions of topic-comment. In: Linguistics 39:641–681.

    Jacobs J. , 'The dimensions of topic-comment ' (2001 ) 39 Linguistics : 641 -681.

  • Kanerva, Jonni 1990. Focus and phrasing in Chicheŵa phonology. Garland, New York.

    Kanerva J. , '', in Focus and phrasing in Chicheŵa phonology , (1990 ) -.

  • Krifka, Manfred 1999. Additive particles under stress. In: Tanya Matthews — Devon Strolovitch (eds): Semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) IX, 111–128. CLC Publications, Ithaca NY.

    Krifka M. , '', in Semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) IX , (1999 ) -.

  • Krifka, Manfred 2008. Basic notions of information structure. In: Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 243–276.

    Krifka M. , 'Basic notions of information structure ' (2008 ) 55 Acta Linguistica Hungarica : 243 -276.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kuno, Susumu 1972. Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. In: Linguistic Inquiry 3: 269–320.

    Kuno S. , 'Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English ' (1972 ) 3 Linguistic Inquiry : 269 -320.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Lambrecht, Knud 1994. Information structure and sentence form. A theory of topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Lambrecht K. , '', in Information structure and sentence form. A theory of topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents , (1994 ) -.

  • Liberman, Mark — Janet Pierrehumbert 1984. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In: Mark Aronoff — Robert T. Oehrle (eds): Language sound structure, 157–233. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Pierrehumbert J. , '', in Language sound structure , (1984 ) -.

  • Marandin, Jean-Marie — Claire Beyssade — Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie — Annie Rialland — Michel de Fornel 2005. The meaning of final contours in French. Manuscript, CNRS and Université de Paris 7.

  • Partee, Barbara H. 1999. Focus, quantification, and semantics—pragmatics issues. In: Peter Bosch — Rob van der Sandt (eds): Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives, 213–231. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Partee B. H. , '', in Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives , (1999 ) -.

  • Pierrehumbert, Janet — Julia Hirschberg 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In: Philip R. Cohen — Jerry Morgan — Martha E. Pollack (eds): Intentions in communication, 271–311. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Hirschberg J. , '', in Intentions in communication , (1990 ) -.

  • Prince, Ellen 1981. Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In: Peter Cole (ed.): Radical pragmatics, 223–256. Academic Press, New York.

    Prince E. , '', in Radical pragmatics , (1981 ) -.

  • Reinhart, Tanya 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics. An analysis of sentence topics. In: Philosophica 27: 53–94.

    Reinhart T. , 'Pragmatics and linguistics. An analysis of sentence topics ' (1981 ) 27 Philosophica : 53 -94.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Reis, Marga — Inger Rosengren 1997. A modular approach to the grammar of additive particles: The case of German auch . In: Journal of Semantics 14: 237–309.

    Rosengren I. , 'A modular approach to the grammar of additive particles: The case of German auch ' (1997 ) 14 Journal of Semantics : 237 -309.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Rizzi, Luigi 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In: Liliane Haegeman (ed.): Elements of grammar, 281–337. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Rizzi L. , '', in Elements of grammar , (1997 ) -.

  • Rooth, Mats 1985. Association with focus. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Rooth M. , '', in Doctoral dissertation , (1985 ) -.

  • Rooth, Mats 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. In: Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.

    Rooth M. , 'A theory of focus interpretation ' (1992 ) 1 Natural Language Semantics : 75 -116.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Rooth, Mats 2004. Acoustic correlates of “second occurrence” focus: Towards an experimental investigation. In: Hans Kamp — Barbara Partee (eds): Contextdependence in the analysis of linguistic meaning, 475–487. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Rooth M. , '', in Contextdependence in the analysis of linguistic meaning , (2004 ) -.

  • Samek-Lodovici, Vieri 2006. When right dislocation meets the left-periphery: A unified analysis of italian non-final focus. In: Lingua 116: 836–873.

    Samek-Lodovici V. , 'When right dislocation meets the left-periphery: A unified analysis of italian non-final focus ' (2006 ) 116 Lingua : 836 -873.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Schwarzschild, Roger 1999. GIVENness, AvoidF and other constraints on the placement of focus. In: Natural Language Semantics 7: 141–177.

    Schwarzschild R. , 'GIVENness, AvoidF and other constraints on the placement of focus ' (1999 ) 7 Natural Language Semantics : 141 -177.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress and phrasing. In: John A. Goldsmith (ed.): The handbook of phonological theory, 550–569. Blackwell, Cambridge MA & Oxford.

    Selkirk E. O. , '', in The handbook of phonological theory , (1995 ) -.

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 2002. Contrastive FOCUS vs. presentational focus: Prosodic evidence from right node raising in English. In: Bernard Bel — Isabel Marlin (eds): Speech prosody 2002: Proceedings of the first international conference on speech prosody, 643–646. Laboratoire Parole et Langage, Aix-en-Provence.

    Selkirk E. O. , '', in Speech prosody 2002: Proceedings of the first international conference on speech prosody , (2002 ) -.

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 2006. The prosodic phrasing of FOCUS followed by focus: The case of English. In: Carlos Gussenhoven — Tomas Riad (eds): Tones and tunes: Studies in word and sentence prosody. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin & New York.

    Selkirk E. O. , '', in Tones and tunes: Studies in word and sentence prosody , (2006 ) -.

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 2008. Contrastive focus, givenness and the unmarked status of “discourse-new”. In: Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 331–346.

    Selkirk E. O. , 'Contrastive focus, givenness and the unmarked status of “discourse-new” ' (2008 ) 55 Acta Linguistica Hungarica : 331 -346.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Stalnaker, Robert 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In: Milton Munitz — Peter Unger (eds): Semantics and philosophy, 197–213. New York University Press, New York.

    Stalnaker R. , '', in Semantics and philosophy , (1974 ) -.

  • Steedman, Mark 2000. Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. In: Linguistic Inquiry 31: 649–689.

    Steedman M. , 'Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface ' (2000 ) 31 Linguistic Inquiry : 649 -689.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Szendrői, Kriszta 2003. A stress-based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus. In: The Linguistic Review 20: 37–78.

    Szendrői K. , 'A stress-based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus ' (2003 ) 20 The Linguistic Review : 37 -78.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Tomioka, Satoshi to appear. Contrastive topics operate on speech acts. In: Zimmermann — Féry (to appear).

  • Truckenbrodt, Hubert 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. In: Linguistic Inquiry 30: 219–255.

    Truckenbrodt H. , 'On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases ' (1999 ) 30 Linguistic Inquiry : 219 -255.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Xu, Yi 1999. Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0 contours. In: Journal of Phonetics 27: 55–105.

    Xu Y. , 'Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0 contours ' (1999 ) 27 Journal of Phonetics : 55 -105.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Zimmermann, Malte 2008. Contrastive focus. In: Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 347–360.

    Zimmermann M. , 'Contrastive focus ' (2008 ) 55 Acta Linguistica Hungarica : 347 -360.

  • Zimmermann, Malte — Caroline Féry (eds) to appear. Information structure in different perspectives. Submitted to Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Zubizarreta, Maria-Luisa 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Zubizarreta M.-L. , '', in Prosody, focus, and word order , (1998 ) -.

The author instruction is available in PDF.

Please, download the file from HERE

Editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Katalin É. Kiss,
Ferenc Kiefer

Editor: Éva Dékány

Technical Editor: Zoltán G. Kiss

Review Editor: Beáta Gyuris

Editorial Board

  • Anne Abeillé
  • Željko Bošković
  • Marcel den Dikken
  • Hans-Martin Gärtner
  • Elly van Gelderen
  • Anders Holmberg
  • Katarzyna Jaszczolt
  • István Kenesei
  • Anikó Lipták
  • Katalin Mády
  • Gereon Müller
  • Csaba Pléh
  • Giampaolo Salvi
  • Irina Sekerina
  • Péter Siptár
  • Gregory Stump
  • Peter Svenonius
  • Anne Tamm
  • Akira Watanabe
  • Jeroen van de Weijer

Acta Linguistica Academica
Address: Benczúr u. 33. HU–1068 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (+36 1) 351 0413; (+36 1) 321 4830 ext. 154
Fax: (36 1) 322 9297
E-mail: ala@nytud.mta.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Arts and Humanities Citation Index
  • Bibliographie Linguistique/Linguistic Bibliography
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • Linguistics Abstracts
  • Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts
  • MLA International Bibliography
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • LinguisList

 

Acta Linguistica Hungarica
Language English
Size  
Year of
Foundation
1951
Publication
Programme
changed title
Volumes
per Year
 
Issues
per Year
 
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1216-8076 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2624 (Online)