Author:
Geoff Schwartz Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu School of English ul. Wieniawskiego 1 61-712 Poznań Poland

Search for other papers by Geoff Schwartz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

This paper presents a proposal for the implementation of auditory specification within structures inspired by GP 2.0 (Kaye-Pöchtrager 2009). In the theory, constituent structure itself is a phonetic object built down from Onset structure. This strategy allows for a faithful representation of the acoustic signal and an insightful model of consonant strength and coda formation. Perceptual considerations suggest that a privative approach to auditory representation can account for phonological behavior, as well as enable us to form testable hypotheses for experimental phonetic study.

  • Blevins, Juliette — Andrew Garrett 2004. The evolution of metathesis. In: Hayes et al. (2004, 117–156).

  • Bregman, Albert S. 1990. Auditory scene analysis. The perceptual organization of sound. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Bregman A. S. , '', in Auditory scene analysis. The perceptual organization of sound , (1990 ) -.

  • Chistovich, Ludmilla A. — Ruslan L. Sheikin — Valentina V. Lublinskaja 1979. ’Centres of gravity’ and spectral peaks as the determinants of vowel quality. In: Bjorn Lindblom— Sven Ohman (eds): Frontiers of speech communication research, 143–157. Academic Press, London.

    Lublinskaja V. V. , '', in Frontiers of speech communication research , (1979 ) -.

  • Content, Alain — Ruth Kearns — Uli Frauenfelder 2001. Boundaries versus onsets in syllabic segmentation. In: Journal of Memory and Language 45: 177–199.

    Frauenfelder U. , 'Boundaries versus onsets in syllabic segmentation ' (2001 ) 45 Journal of Memory and Language : 177 -199 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Donegan, Patricia J. 2002. Phonological processes and phonetic rules. In: Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk — Jaroslaw Weckwerth (eds): Future challenges for natural linguistics, 57–81. Lincom, Munich.

    Donegan P. J. , '', in Future challenges for natural linguistics , (2002 ) -.

  • Fahey, Richard P. — Randy L. Diehl — Hartmut Traunmuller 1996. Perception of back vowels: Effects of varying F1-F0 Bark distance. In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99: 2350–2357.

    Traunmuller H. , 'Perception of back vowels: Effects of varying F1-F0 Bark distance ' (1996 ) 99 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America : 2350 -2357 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Flemming, Edward 2002. Auditory representations in phonology. Routledge, New York.

    Flemming E. , '', in Auditory representations in phonology , (2002 ) -.

  • Harris, John 2004. Release the captive coda: The foot as a domain of phonetic interpretation. In: John Local — Richard Ogden — Rosalind Temple (eds): Phonetic interpretation (Papers in Laboratory Phonology 6), 103–129. Cambridge University Press.

  • Harris, John 2009. Why final devoicing is weakening. In: Kuniya Nasukawa — Philip Backley (eds): Strength relations in phonology, 9–46. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin & New York.

    Harris J. , '', in Strength relations in phonology , (2009 ) -.

  • Harris, John — Geoff Lindsey 1995. The elements of phonological representation. In: Jacques Durand — Francis Katamba (eds): Frontiers of phonology: Atoms, structures, derivations, 34–79. Longman, Harlow.

    Lindsey G. , '', in Frontiers of phonology: Atoms, structures, derivations , (1995 ) -.

  • Hayes, Bruce —Robert Kirchner — Donca Steriade (eds) 2004. Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    '', in Phonetically based phonology , (2004 ) -.

  • Hayes, Bruce — Donca Steriade 2004. The phonetic bases of phonological markedness. In: Hayes, Bruce — Robert Kirchner — Donca Steriade (eds) 2004. Phonetically based phonology. Hayes et al. (2004, 1–33).

  • Hoemeke, Kathryn A. — Randy L. Diehl 1994. Perception of vowel height: The role of F1-f0 distance. In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96: 661–674.

    Diehl R. L. , 'Perception of vowel height: The role of F1-f0 distance ' (1994 ) 96 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America : 661 -674 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Jensen, Sean 1994. Is ? an element? Towards a non-segmental phonology. In: SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 4: 71–78.

    Jensen S. , 'Is ? an element? Towards a non-segmental phonology ' (1994 ) 4 SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics : 71 -78 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kaisse, Ellen 1992. Can [consonantal] spread? In: Language 68: 313–332.

    Kaisse E. , 'Can [consonantal] spread? ' (1992 ) 68 Language : 313 -332 .

  • Kamprath, Christine K. 1987. Swiss-Romansch glide, extrasyllabicity, and the sonority scale. In: Texas Linguistic Forum 28: 28–40.

    Kamprath C. K. , 'Swiss-Romansch glide, extrasyllabicity, and the sonority scale ' (1987 ) 28 Texas Linguistic Forum : 28 -40 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kaun, Abigail 2004. The typology of rounding harmony. In: Hayes, Bruce — Robert Kirchner — Donca Steriade (eds) 2004. Phonetically based phonology.Hayes et al. (2004, 87–116).

  • Kaye, Jonathan D. — Markus Alexander Pochtrager 2009. GP 2.0. Paper presented at the GPRT6, Piliscsaba, Hungary, April 25, 2009.

  • Labov, William 1994. Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.

    Labov W. , '', in Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors , (1994 ) -.

  • Lindblom, Björn 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In: William J. Hardcastle — Alain Marchal (eds): Speech production and speech modeling, 403–440. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Lindblom B. , '', in Speech production and speech modeling , (1990 ) -.

  • Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In: Carrie S. Masek — Roberta A. Hendrik — Mary Frances Miller (eds): Papers from the parasession on language and behaviour (CLS 17), 178–203. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.

    Ohala J. J. , '', in Papers from the parasession on language and behaviour (CLS 17) , (1981 ) -.

  • Ohala, John J. 1990. There is no interface between phonology and phonetics: A personal view. In: Journal of Phonetics 18: 153–171.

    Ohala J. J. , 'There is no interface between phonology and phonetics: A personal view ' (1990 ) 18 Journal of Phonetics : 153 -171 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Palmer, John M. 1993. Anatomy for speech and hearing. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.

    Palmer J. M. , '', in Anatomy for speech and hearing , (1993 ) -.

  • Pochtrager, Markus Alexander 2006. The structure of length. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Wien.

  • Scheer, Tobias 2001. On locality and phonology in phonology. Ms. ( http://www.unice.fr/dsl/tobias.htm ; date of access: Jan 13, 2008)

  • Schwartz, Geoff 2009. Onset prominence and phonotactics. Poster presented at the 17th Manchester Phonology Meeting.

  • Stevens, Kenneth N. 1998. Acoustic phonetics. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Stevens K. N. , '', in Acoustic phonetics , (1998 ) -.

  • Traunmuller, Hartmut 1994. Conventional, biological, and environmental factors in speech communication: A modulation theory. In: Phonetica 51: 170–183.

    Traunmuller H. , 'Conventional, biological, and environmental factors in speech communication: A modulation theory ' (1994 ) 51 Phonetica : 170 -183 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wright, Richard 2004. A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In: Hayes, Bruce — Robert Kirchner — Donca Steriade (eds) 2004. Phonetically based phonology.Hayes et al. (2004, 34–57).

  • Wright, Richard — Stefan A. Frisch — David B. Pisoni 1997. Speech perception. Research on spoken language processing (Progress Report No. 21). Indiana University.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Katalin É. Kiss,
Ferenc Kiefer

Editor: Éva Dékány

Technical Editor: Zoltán G. Kiss

Review Editor: Beáta Gyuris

Editorial Board

  • Anne Abeillé
  • Željko Bošković
  • Marcel den Dikken
  • Hans-Martin Gärtner
  • Elly van Gelderen
  • Anders Holmberg
  • Katarzyna Jaszczolt
  • István Kenesei
  • Anikó Lipták
  • Katalin Mády
  • Gereon Müller
  • Csaba Pléh
  • Giampaolo Salvi
  • Irina Sekerina
  • Péter Siptár
  • Gregory Stump
  • Peter Svenonius
  • Anne Tamm
  • Akira Watanabe
  • Jeroen van de Weijer

Acta Linguistica Academica
Address: Benczúr u. 33. HU–1068 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (+36 1) 351 0413; (+36 1) 321 4830 ext. 154
Fax: (36 1) 322 9297
E-mail: ala@nytud.mta.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Arts and Humanities Citation Index
  • Bibliographie Linguistique/Linguistic Bibliography
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • Linguistics Abstracts
  • Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts
  • MLA International Bibliography
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • LinguisList

 

Acta Linguistica Hungarica
Language English
Size  
Year of
Foundation
1951
Publication
Programme
changed title
Volumes
per Year
 
Issues
per Year
 
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1216-8076 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2624 (Online)