View More View Less
  • 1 Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Cognitive Science Budapest Hungary
  • | 2 University of Szeged Department of Hungarian Szeged Hungary
  • | 3 Stoczek u. 2. H-1111 Budapest Hungary
Full access

In two acoustic sentence recognition experiments the relative importance of recognition times (0 to 40 seconds) and relationships between the target sentence and test sentences were varied. Hungarian promised to be a good testing ground for traditional theories that claim that while form is readily forgotten, sentence meaning is preserved. In Hungarian, the informational structure of sentences allows for clear contrasts between neutral and meaning-related order variations. In the stimulus material, target sentences were compared in recognition scores with identical, neutral word order, paraphrased, and focused sentence pairs. The results partly support our starting hypotheses, but partly show that the intricacies of Hungarian sentential syntax call for a more reserved and more carefully qualified expression of the initial proposals of Sachs (1967) and Johnson-Laird and Stevenson (1970). Focused sentences are clearly contrasted with non-focused initial targets even after 40 seconds. It seems that the information structure of Hungarian sentences is somehow maintained in the long-term memory system. In accordance with the classical results, meaning-neutral word order variations are misrecognized in about 60 per cent after 16 seconds already. Contrary to our hypothesis, even after 40 seconds, paraphrases were correctly recognized more than 60 per cent of the time. Thus, to clarify memorial paraphrase equivalence to cross-linguistic validity, more types of sentential paraphrases should be compared. The study supports the main ideas underlying the experiments: the informational structure of the Hungarian sentence seems to be retained in long-term memory, unlike neutral word order variations. This finding calls for a more detailed study with more varied stimulus materials to clarify some further issues of what is ‘form’ and what is ‘meaning’ for the memory system.

  • Anderson, John R. — Raluca Budiu — Lynne M. Reder 2001. A theory of sentence memory as part of a general theory of memory. In: Journal of Memory and Language 45: 337–367.

    Reder L. M. , 'A theory of sentence memory as part of a general theory of memory ' (2001 ) 45 Journal of Memory and Language : 337 -367.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Clark, Eve V. — Herbert H. Clark 1977. Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.

    Clark H. H. , '', in Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics , (1977 ) -.

  • É. Kiss, Katalin 1981a. Syntactic relations in Hungarian, a “free” word order language. In: Linguistic Inquiry 12: 185–215.

    Kiss K. , 'Syntactic relations in Hungarian, a “free” word order language ' (1981 ) 12 Linguistic Inquiry : 185 -215.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • É. Kiss, Katalin 1981b. Topic and focus: The operators of the Hungarian sentence. In: Folia Linguistica (Acta Societatis Linguistica Eurpaeae) 16: 305–330.

    Kiss K. , 'Topic and focus: The operators of the Hungarian sentence ' (1981 ) 16 Folia Linguistica (Acta Societatis Linguistica Eurpaeae) : 305 -330.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • É. Kiss, Katalin 1987. Configurationality in Hungarian. Reidel/Akadémiai Kiadó, Dordrecht/Budapest.

    Kiss K. , '', in Configurationality in Hungarian , (1987 ) -.

  • É. Kiss, Katalin 2002. The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Kiss K. , '', in The syntax of Hungarian , (2002 ) -.

  • Fillenbaum, Samuel 1973. Syntactic factors in memory? Mouton, The Hague.

    Fillenbaum S. , '', in Syntactic factors in memory? , (1973 ) -.

  • Flores d’Arcais, Giovanni B. 1974. Is there a memory for sentences? In: Acta Psychologica 38: 33–58.

    Flores d’Arcais G. B. , 'Is there a memory for sentences? ' (1974 ) 38 Acta Psychologica : 33 -58.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Johnson-Laird, Philip N. — Rosemary Stevenson 1970. Memory for syntax. In: Nature 227: 412.

    Stevenson R. , 'Memory for syntax ' (1970 ) 227 Nature : 412 -.

  • Kiefer, Ferenc 2005. On the information structure of the Hungarian sentence. In: Hungarian Studies 19: 255–265.

    Kiefer F. , 'On the information structure of the Hungarian sentence ' (2005 ) 19 Hungarian Studies : 255 -265.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kintsch, Walter 1974. The representation of meaning in memory. Erlbaum, Mahlah, NJ.

    Kintsch W. , '', in The representation of meaning in memory , (1974 ) -.

  • Kintsch, Walter — David Welsch — Franz Schmalhofer — Susan Zimny 1990. Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis. In: Journal of Memory and Language 29: 133–159.

    Zimny S. , 'Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis ' (1990 ) 29 Journal of Memory and Language : 133 -159.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Lambrecht, Knud 1994. Information structure and sentence form. A theory of topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Lambrecht K. , '', in Information structure and sentence form. A theory of topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents , (1994 ) -.

  • Pléh, Csaba — Farrel Ackermann — András Komlósi 1989. On the psycholinguistics of preverbal modifiers in Hungarian: Adult intuitions and children’s treatment of modifiers. In: Folia Linguistica (Acta Societatis Linguistica Eurpaeae) 23: 181–214.

    Komlósi A. , 'On the psycholinguistics of preverbal modifiers in Hungarian: Adult intuitions and children’s treatment of modifiers ' (1989 ) 23 Folia Linguistica (Acta Societatis Linguistica Eurpaeae) : 181 -214.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Sachs, Jacqueline Strunk 1967. Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. In: Perception and Psychophysics 2: 437–442.

    Sachs J. S. , 'Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse ' (1967 ) 2 Perception and Psychophysics : 437 -442.

    • Search Google Scholar

The author instruction is available in PDF.

Please, download the file from HERE

Editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Katalin É. Kiss,
Ferenc Kiefer

Editor: Éva Dékány

Technical Editor: Zoltán G. Kiss

Review Editor: Beáta Gyuris

Editorial Board

  • Anne Abeillé
  • Željko Bošković
  • Marcel den Dikken
  • Hans-Martin Gärtner
  • Elly van Gelderen
  • Anders Holmberg
  • Katarzyna Jaszczolt
  • István Kenesei
  • Anikó Lipták
  • Katalin Mády
  • Gereon Müller
  • Csaba Pléh
  • Giampaolo Salvi
  • Irina Sekerina
  • Péter Siptár
  • Gregory Stump
  • Peter Svenonius
  • Anne Tamm
  • Akira Watanabe
  • Jeroen van de Weijer

Acta Linguistica Academica
Address: Benczúr u. 33. HU–1068 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (+36 1) 351 0413; (+36 1) 321 4830 ext. 154
Fax: (36 1) 322 9297
E-mail: ala@nytud.mta.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Arts and Humanities Citation Index
  • Bibliographie Linguistique/Linguistic Bibliography
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • Linguistics Abstracts
  • Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts
  • MLA International Bibliography
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • LinguisList

 

Acta Linguistica Hungarica
Language English
Size  
Year of
Foundation
1951
Publication
Programme
changed title
Volumes
per Year
 
Issues
per Year
 
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1216-8076 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2624 (Online)