View More View Less
  • 1 Université d’Orléans ‘Cognitions Humaine et Artificielle’ EA 4004 CHArt Paris France
  • | 2 Laboratoire de Mathématiques Raphaël Salem ERIS Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray France
  • | 3 41 Rue Gay Lussac 75005 Paris France
Full access

This study looks at how combinations of two French nouns are interpreted. The order of occurrence of the constituents of two types of conceptual combinations, relation and property, was manipulated in view of determining how property-based and relation-based interpretations evolve with age. Three groups of French-speaking children (ages 6, 8, and 10) and a group of adults performed an interpretation-selection task. The results for the children indicated that while property-based interpretations increased with age, relation-based interpretations were in the majority for both combination types, whereas for the adults, relation-based interpretations were in the minority for property combinations. For the children and adults alike, the most frequent interpretations were ones in which the head noun came first and was followed by the modifier (the opposite of the order observed for English).

  • Bock, John—Charles Clifton 2000. The role of salience in conceptual combination. In: Memory and Cognition 28: 1378–1386.

    Clifton C. , 'The role of salience in conceptual combination ' (2000 ) 28 Memory and Cognition : 1378 -1386.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Bowdle, Brian—Dedre Gentner 2005. The career of metaphor. In: Psychological Review 112: 193–216.

    Gentner D. , 'The career of metaphor ' (2005 ) 112 Psychological Review : 193 -216.

  • Caramelli, Nicoletta—Anna Borghi 2004. The role of Head Nouns in conceptual combination. In: Jean Drévillon— Jean Vivier— Agnès Salinas (eds): Psycholinguistics: A multidisciplinary science. Proceedings of the VIth ISAPL International Congress, Caen, June 28–July 1 2000, 87–92. Europia, Paris.

  • Costello, Fintan—Mark Keane 2000. Efficient creativity: Constraint-guided conceptual combination. In: Cognitive Science 24: 299–349.

    Keane M. , 'Efficient creativity: Constraint-guided conceptual combination ' (2000 ) 24 Cognitive Science : 299 -349.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Costello, Fintan—Mark Keane 2001. Testing two theories of conceptual combination: Alignment vs diagnosticity in the comprehension and production of combined concepts. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 27: 255–271.

    Keane M. , 'Testing two theories of conceptual combination: Alignment vs diagnosticity in the comprehension and production of combined concepts ' (2001 ) 27 Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition : 255 -271.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Denhière, Guy—Cedrick Bellissens— Sandra Jhean-Larose— Benoît Lemaire 2007. A semantic space for modeling a child’s semantic memory. In: Thomas K. Landauer— Danielle S. McNamara — Simon Dennis— Walter Kintsch (eds): Handbook of latent semantic analysis, 143–165. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ.

    Lemaire B. , '', in Handbook of latent semantic analysis , (2007 ) -.

  • Denhière, Guy—Benoît Lemaire— Cedrick Bellissens— Sandra Jhean-Larose 2006. A computational model for simulating text comprehension. In: Behavior Research Methods 38: 628–637.

    Jhean-Larose S. , 'A computational model for simulating text comprehension ' (2006 ) 38 Behavior Research Methods : 628 -637.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Downing, Pamela 1977. On the creation and use of English compound nouns. In: Language 53: 810–842.

    Downing P. , 'On the creation and use of English compound nouns ' (1977 ) 53 Language : 810 -842.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Estes, Zachary—Sam Glucksberg 1999. Relevance and feature accessibility in combined concepts. In: Martin Hahn— Scott C. Stoness (eds): Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 149–154. Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ.

    Glucksberg S. , '', in Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , (1999 ) -.

  • Estes, Zachary—Sam Glucksberg 2000. Interactive property attribution in concept combination. In: Memory and Cognition 28: 28–34.

    Glucksberg S. , 'Interactive property attribution in concept combination ' (2000 ) 28 Memory and Cognition : 28 -34.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Gagné, Christina 2000. Relation-based combinations versus property-based combinations: A test of the CARIN theory and dual-process theory of conceptual combination. In: Journal of Memory and Language 42: 365–389.

    Gagné C. , 'Relation-based combinations versus property-based combinations: A test of the CARIN theory and dual-process theory of conceptual combination ' (2000 ) 42 Journal of Memory and Language : 365 -389.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Gagné, Christina 2001. Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 27: 236–254.

    Gagné C. , 'Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations ' (2001 ) 27 Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition : 236 -254.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Gagné, Christina 2002. Lexical and relational influences on the processing of novel compounds. In: Brain and Language 81: 723–735.

    Gagné C. , 'Lexical and relational influences on the processing of novel compounds ' (2002 ) 81 Brain and Language : 723 -735.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Gagné, Christina—Edward Shoben 1997. Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 23: 71–87.

    Shoben E. , 'Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations ' (1997 ) 23 Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition : 71 -87.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Gentner, Dedre 1983. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. In: Cognitive Science 7: 155–170.

    Gentner D. , 'Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy ' (1983 ) 7 Cognitive Science : 155 -170.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Gentner, Dedre 1989. The mechanisms of analogical learning. In: Stella Vosniadou— Andrew Ortony (eds): Similarity and analogical reasoning, 199–241. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Gentner D. , '', in Similarity and analogical reasoning , (1989 ) -.

  • Gineste, Marie-Dominique—Véronique Scart-Lhomme 1999. Comment comprenonsnous les métaphores? In: LłAnnée Psychologique 99: 447–492.

    Scart-Lhomme V. , 'Comment comprenonsnous les métaphores? ' (1999 ) 99 LłAnnée Psychologique : 447 -492.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Glucksberg, Sam—Matthew McGlone— Deanna Manfredi 1997. Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. In: Journal of Memory and Language 36: 50–67.

    Manfredi D. , 'Property attribution in metaphor comprehension ' (1997 ) 36 Journal of Memory and Language : 50 -67.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Hampton, James 1987. Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions. In: Memory and Cognition 15: 55–71.

    Hampton J. , 'Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions ' (1987 ) 15 Memory and Cognition : 55 -71.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Jhean-Larose, Sandra—Guy Denhière 2006. Etude des processus cognitifs d’interprétation de combinaisons conceptuelles nouvelles. In: L’Année Psychologique 2:265–304.

    Denhière G. , 'Etude des processus cognitifs d’interprétation de combinaisons conceptuelles nouvelles ' (2006 ) 2 L’Année Psychologique : 265 -304.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Jhean-Larose, Sandra—Guy Denhière 2007. Word order and type of relation effects in conceptual combination during the early school years. In: Stella Vosnadiou— Daniel Kayser— Athanassios Protopapas (eds): Proceedings of the EuroCogSci 07, The European Cognitive Science Conference 2007, Delphes, 919. Psychology Press, Hove.

    Denhière G. , '', in Proceedings of the EuroCogSci 07, The European Cognitive Science Conference 2007, Delphes, 919 , (2007 ) -.

  • Jhean-Larose, Sandra—Guy Denhière— Bruno Lecoutre 2009. Étude développementale de l’interprétation de combinaisons conceptuelles nominales «Relation » et « Propriété ». In: Psychologie Française 54: 121–135.

    Lecoutre B. , 'Étude développementale de l’interprétation de combinaisons conceptuelles nominales «Relation » et « Propriété » ' (2009 ) 54 Psychologie Française : 121 -135.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Jhean-Larose, Sandra—Guy Denhière— Fabiola Martinez 2007. A developmental approach of word order and type of relation effects in conceptual combination. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society, Developmental Section, University of Plymouth, 29–31 August 2007.

  • Jones, Lyle V.—John W. Tukey 2000. A sensible formulation of the significance test. In: Psychological Methods 5: 411–414.

    Tukey J. W. , 'A sensible formulation of the significance test ' (2000 ) 5 Psychological Methods : 411 -414.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Landauer, Tom—Suzanne Dumais 1997. A solution to Plato’s problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of the acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. In: Psychological Review 104: 211–240.

    Dumais S. , 'A solution to Plato’s problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of the acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge ' (1997 ) 104 Psychological Review : 211 -240.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Le Ny, Jean-François 2005. Comment l’esprit produit du sens. Odile Jacob, Paris.

    Ny J.-F. , '', in Comment l’esprit produit du sens , (2005 ) -.

  • Lecoutre, Bruno 2006. Training students and researchers in Bayesian methods for experimental data analysis. In: Journal of Data Science 4: 207–232.

    Lecoutre B. , 'Training students and researchers in Bayesian methods for experimental data analysis ' (2006 ) 4 Journal of Data Science : 207 -232.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Lecoutre, Bruno 2008. Bayesian methods for experimental data analysis. In: Calyampudi Radhakrishna Rao— J. Philip Miller— Dabeern C. Rao (eds): Handbook of statistics: Epidemiology and medical statistics (Vol. 27), 775–812. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Lecoutre B. , '', in Handbook of statistics: Epidemiology and medical statistics , (2008 ) -.

  • Lecoutre, Bruno—Marie-Paule Lecoutre— Jacques Poitevineau 2010. Killeen’s probability of replication and predictive probabilities: How to compute, use and interpret them. In: Psychological Methods 15: 158–171.

    Poitevineau J. , 'Killeen’s probability of replication and predictive probabilities: How to compute, use and interpret them ' (2010 ) 15 Psychological Methods : 158 -171.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Lecoutre, Bruno—Jacques Poitevineau 2005. Le logiciel « LePAC» dédié aux procédures bayésiennes. In: La Revue Modulad 33. ( http://tinyurl.com/chfuhkh )

  • Levi, Judith 1978. The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. Academic Press, New York.

    Levi J. , '', in The syntax and semantics of complex nominals , (1978 ) -.

  • Markman, Arthur B.—Dedre Gentner 1993. Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. In: Cognitive Psychology 25: 431–467.

    Gentner D. , 'Structural alignment during similarity comparisons ' (1993 ) 25 Cognitive Psychology : 431 -467.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Markman, Arthur B.—Edward J. Wisniewski 1997. Similar and different: The differentiation of basic level categories. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23: 54–70.

    Wisniewski E. J. , 'Similar and different: The differentiation of basic level categories ' (1997 ) 23 Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition : 54 -70.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Medin, Douglas—Edward Shoben 1988. Context and structure in conceptual combination. In: Cognitive Psychology 20: 158–190.

    Shoben E. , 'Context and structure in conceptual combination ' (1988 ) 20 Cognitive Psychology : 158 -190.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Murphy, Gregory L. 1988. Comprehending complex concepts. In: Cognitive Science 12: 529–562.

    Murphy G. L. , 'Comprehending complex concepts ' (1988 ) 12 Cognitive Science : 529 -562.

  • Murphy, Gregory L. 1990. Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination. In: Journal of Memory and Language 29: 259–288.

    Murphy G. L. , 'Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination ' (1990 ) 29 Journal of Memory and Language : 259 -288.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Murphy, Gregory L. 2002. The big book of concepts. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Murphy G. L. , '', in The big book of concepts , (2002 ) -.

  • Noailly, Michèle 1990. Le substantif épithète. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

    Noailly M. , '', in Le substantif épithète , (1990 ) -.

  • Parault, Susan—Paul Schwanenflugel— Heather Rogers Haverback 2005. The development of interpretations for novel noun-noun conceptual combinations during the early school years. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology 91: 67–87.

    Haverback H. R. , 'The development of interpretations for novel noun-noun conceptual combinations during the early school years ' (2005 ) 91 Journal of Experimental Psychology : 67 -87.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Rouanet, Henri 1996. Bayesian methods for assessing importance of effects. In: Psychological Bulletin 119: 149–158.

    Rouanet H. , 'Bayesian methods for assessing importance of effects ' (1996 ) 119 Psychological Bulletin : 149 -158.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Spalding, Thomas—Christina Gagné— Allison Mullaly— Hongbo Ji 2010. Relation-based interpretations of noun-noun phrases: A new theoretical approach. In: Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 17: 283–315.

    Ji H. , 'Relation-based interpretations of noun-noun phrases: A new theoretical approach ' (2010 ) 17 Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft : 283 -315.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Storms, Gert—Edward Wisniewski 2005. Does the order of head noun and modifier explain response times in conceptual combination? In: Memory and Cognition 33: 852–861.

    Wisniewski E. , 'Does the order of head noun and modifier explain response times in conceptual combination? ' (2005 ) 33 Memory and Cognition : 852 -861.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Tiberghien, Guy 1997. La mémoire oubliée. Mardaga, Liège.

    Tiberghien G. , '', in La mémoire oubliée , (1997 ) -.

  • Wisniewski, Edward 1996. Construal and similarity in conceptual combination. In: Journal of Memory and Language 35: 434–453.

    Wisniewski E. , 'Construal and similarity in conceptual combination ' (1996 ) 35 Journal of Memory and Language : 434 -453.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wisniewski, Edward 1997. When concepts combine. In: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4: 167–183.

    Wisniewski E. , 'When concepts combine ' (1997 ) 4 Psychonomic Bulletin & Review : 167 -183.

  • Wisniewski, Edward—Emily J. Clancy 2004. You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows: The role of discourse context in conceptual combination. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Wisniewski, Edward—Bradley C. Love 1998. Properties versus relations in conceptual combination. In: Journal of Memory and Language 38: 177–202.

    Love B. C. , 'Properties versus relations in conceptual combination ' (1998 ) 38 Journal of Memory and Language : 177 -202.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wisniewski, Edward—Erica Middleton 2002. Of bucket bowls and coffee cup bowls: Spatial alignment in conceptual combination. In: Journal of Memory and Language 46: 1–23.

    Middleton E. , 'Of bucket bowls and coffee cup bowls: Spatial alignment in conceptual combination ' (2002 ) 46 Journal of Memory and Language : 1 -23.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wolff, Phillip—Dedre Gentner 2000. Evidence for role-neutral initial processing of metaphors. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26: 1–13.

    Gentner D. , 'Evidence for role-neutral initial processing of metaphors ' (2000 ) 26 Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition : 1 -13.

    • Search Google Scholar