Authors:
Katalin Kiss

Search for other papers by Katalin Kiss in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mátyás Gerőcs

Search for other papers by Mátyás Gerőcs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Tamás Zétényi Budapest University of Technology and Economics Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by Tamás Zétényi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

This paper presents the results of two sentence-picture matching experiments investigating how Hungarian preschoolers interpret doubly quantified sentences involving numerical quantifiers. We claim that for Hungarian children, scope interpretation is primarily determined by the structure of the visual representation of the event associated with the given sentence. We found in a series of previous experiments that children’s preferred scope order cannot be derived from either the linear order of quantifiers, or from any other linguistic factor, but seems to be affected by visual cues provided by the picture stimuli. In this follow-up study, we tested two hypotheses, namely: (i) children assign wide scope to the set whose elements are more salient in the visual representation; (ii) children choose the scope interpretation whose visual representation is easier to chunk into identical subevents. The results confirm hypothesis (ii). This converges with the results of former experiments testing children’s interpretation of every and each, according to which children use these quantifiers to quantify over events rather than individuals (cf. Philip 1995, etc.).

  • Aoun, Joseph and Yen-hui Audrey Li. 1993. Syntax of scope. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Li Y.-h. A. , '', in Syntax of scope , (1993 ) -.

  • Bach, Emmon, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer and Barbara H. Partee (eds.). 1995. Quantification in natural languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    '', in Quantification in natural languages , (1995 ) -.

  • Brody, Michael and Anna Szabolcsi. 2003. Overt scope in Hungarian. Syntax 6. 19–51.

    Szabolcsi A. , 'Overt scope in Hungarian ' (2003 ) 6 Syntax : 19 -51 .

  • Brooks, Patricia J. and Martin D. S. Braine. 1996. What do children know about the universal quantifiers al l and each? Cognition 60. 235–268.

    Braine M. D. S. , 'What do children know about the universal quantifiers al l and each? ' (1996 ) 60 Cognition : 235 -268 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Brooks, Patricia J. and Irina A. Sekerina. 2006. Shortcuts to quantifier interpretation in children and adults. Language Acquisition 13. 177–206.

    Sekerina I. A. , 'Shortcuts to quantifier interpretation in children and adults ' (2006 ) 13 Language Acquisition : 177 -206 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • É. Kiss, Katalin. 1987. Configurationality in Hungarian. Dordrecht/Budapest: Reidel/Akadémiai Kiadó.

    É. Kiss Katalin. , '', in Configurationality in Hungarian , (1987 ) -.

  • É. Kiss, Katalin. 1991. Logical structure in syntactic structure: The case of Hungarian. In J. Huang and R. May (eds.) Logical structure and linguistic structure: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 111–148.

    É. Kiss Katalin. , '', in Logical structure and linguistic structure: Crosslinguistic perspectives , (1991 ) -.

  • É. Kiss, Katalin. 2002. The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    É. Kiss Katalin. , '', in The syntax of Hungarian , (2002 ) -.

  • É. Kiss, Katalin. 2010. An adjunction analysis of quantifiers and adverbials in the Hungarian sentence. Lingua 120. 506–526.

    É. Kiss Katalin. , 'An adjunction analysis of quantifiers and adverbials in the Hungarian sentence ' (2010 ) 120 Lingua : 506 -526 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • É. Kiss, Katalin and Mátyás Gerőcs. 2012. How do Hungarian preschoolers interpret doubly quantified sentences? Paper presented at the 2012 Budapest CEU Conference on Cognitive Development.

  • É. Kiss, Katalin, Mátyás Gerőcs and Tamás Zétényi. 2012. The linguistic roots of multiplication. Manuscript. Research Institute for Linguistics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest. ( http://tinyurl.com/cy8pkgd )

    Zétényi T. , '', in The linguistic roots of multiplication , (2012 ) -.

  • É. Kiss, Katalin and Beáta Gyuris. 2003. Apparent scope inversion under the rise fall contour. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 50. 371–404.

    Gyuris B. , 'Apparent scope inversion under the rise fall contour ' (2003 ) 50 Acta Linguistica Hungarica : 371 -404 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Feigenson, Lisa and Justin Halberda. 2004. Infants chunk object arrays into sets of individuals. Cognition 91. 173–190.

    Halberda J. , 'Infants chunk object arrays into sets of individuals ' (2004 ) 91 Cognition : 173 -190 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Fodor, Janet. 1982. The mental representation of quantifiers. In S. Peters and E. Saarinen (eds.) Processes, beliefs, and questons. Dordrecht: Reidel. 29–164.

    Fodor Janet. , '', in Processes, beliefs, and questons , (1982 ) -.

  • Gennari, Silvia and Maryellen C. MacDonald. 2005/2006. Acquisition of negation and quantification: Insights from adult production and comprehension. Language Acquisition 13. 125–168.

    MacDonald M. C. , 'Acquisition of negation and quantification: Insights from adult production and comprehension ' (2005 ) 13 Language Acquisition : 125 -168 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Gillen, Kathryn. 1991. The comprehension of doubly quantified sentences. Doctoral dissertation. University of Durham.

  • Gyuris, Beáta. 1996. Az univerzális kvantifikáció értelmezése óvodás korban [The interpretation of universal quantification in preschool age]. In G. Székely and E. Cs. Jónás (eds.) Nyelvek és nyelvoktatás a Kárpát-medencében [Languages and language teaching in the Carpathian Basin]. Nyíregyháza: Bessenyei György Könyvkiadó 290–305.

    Gyuris Beáta. , '', in Nyelvek és nyelvoktatás a Kárpát-medencében , (1996 ) -.

  • Hunyadi, László. 1986. The expression of logical scope in Hungarian. On its syntax and semantics. In W. Abraham and S. de Meij (eds.) Topic, focus, and configurationality. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 89–102.

    Hunyadi László. , '', in Topic, focus, and configurationality , (1986 ) -.

  • Ioup, Georgette. 1975. Some universals for quantifier scope. In J. P. Kimball (ed.) Syntax and semantics 4. New York: Academic Press. 37–5.

    Ioup Georgette. , '', in Syntax and semantics 4 , (1975 ) -.

  • Johnson-Laird, Philip N., Ruth M. J. Byrne and Patrizia Tabossi. 1989. Reasoning by model: The case of multiple quantification. Psychological Review 96. 658–673.

    Tabossi P. , 'Reasoning by model: The case of multiple quantification ' (1989 ) 96 Psychological Review : 658 -673 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kang, Hye-Kyung. 2001. Quantifier spreading: Linguistic and pragmatic considerations. Lingua 111. 591–627.

    Kang H.-Kyung. , 'Quantifier spreading: Linguistic and pragmatic considerations ' (2001 ) 111 Lingua : 591 -627 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kurtzman, Howard S. and Maryellen MacDonald. 1993. Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities. Cognition 48. 273–279.

    MacDonald M. , 'Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities ' (1993 ) 48 Cognition : 273 -279 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Lee, Thomas Hun-tak. 1997. Scope and distributivity in child Mandarin. In E. Clark (ed.) Proceedings of the 28th Child Language Research Forum. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association, Centre for the Study of Language and Information. 173–182.

    Lee T. H.-tak. , '', in Proceedings of the 28th Child Language Research Forum , (1997 ) -.

  • Lidz, Jeffrey, Erin McMahon, Kristen Syrett, Joshua Viau, Florencia Anggoro, Jessica Peterson-Hicks, Elisa Sneed, Ann Bunger, Taki Flevaris, Anne Graham, Kristy Grohne, Yongeun Lee and John Evar Strid. 2004. Quantifier raising in 4-year-olds. In: A. Brugos, L. Micciulla and Christine E. Smith (eds.) Proceedings of the 28th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

    Strid J. E. , '', in Proceedings of the 28th Boston University Conference on Language Development , (2004 ) -.

  • Lidz, Jeffrey and Julien Musolino. 2002. Children’s command of quantification. Cognition 84. 113–154.

    Musolino J. , 'Children’s command of quantification ' (2002 ) 84 Cognition : 113 -154 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Micham, Dennis L., Jack Catlin, Nancy J. VanDerveer and Katherine A. Loveland. 1980. Lexical and structural cues in quantifier scope relations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 9. 367–377.

    Loveland K. A. , 'Lexical and structural cues in quantifier scope relations ' (1980 ) 9 Journal of Psycholinguistic Research : 367 -377 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Musolino, Julien. 1998. Universal grammar and the acquisition of semantic knowledge: An experimental investigation of quantifier-negation interaction in English. Doctoral dissertation. University of Maryland.

  • Musolino, Julien. 2009. The logical syntax of number words: Theory, acquisition and processing. Cognition 111. 24–45.

    Musolino Julien. , 'The logical syntax of number words: Theory, acquisition and processing ' (2009 ) 111 Cognition : 24 -45 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Musolino, Julien, Stephen Crain and Rosalind Thornton. 2000. Navigating negative quantificational space. Linguistics 38. 1–32.

    Thornton R. , 'Navigating negative quantificational space ' (2000 ) 38 Linguistics : 1 -32 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Musolino, Julien and Jeffrey Lidz. 2003. The scope of isomorphism: Turning adults into children. Language Acquisition 11. 277–291.

    Lidz J. , 'The scope of isomorphism: Turning adults into children ' (2003 ) 11 Language Acquisition : 277 -291 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Musolino, Julien and Jeffrey Lidz. 2006. Why children aren’t universally successful with quantification. Linguistics 44. 817–852.

    Lidz J. , 'Why children aren’t universally successful with quantification ' (2006 ) 44 Linguistics : 817 -852 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Philip, William. 1995. Event quantification in the acquisition of universal quantification. Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Philip William. , '', in Event quantification in the acquisition of universal quantification , (1995 ) -.

  • Pica, Pierre and Alain Lecompte. 2008. Theoretical implications of the study of numbers and numerals in Mundurucu. Philosophical Psychology 21. 507–522.

    Lecompte A. , 'Theoretical implications of the study of numbers and numerals in Mundurucu ' (2008 ) 21 Philosophical Psychology : 507 -522 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Pléh, Csaba. 1998. A mondatmegértés a magyar nyelvben [Sentence interpretation in Hungarian]. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.

    Pléh Csaba. , '', in A mondatmegértés a magyar nyelvben , (1998 ) -.

  • Surányi, Balázs. 2002. Multiple operator movements in Hungarian. Doctoral dissertation. LOT, Utrecht.

    Surányi Balázs. , '', in Multiple operator movements in Hungarian , (2002 ) -.

  • Surányi, Balázs. 2006. Quantification and focus in negative concord. Lingua 116. 272–313.

    Surányi Balázs. , 'Quantification and focus in negative concord ' (2006 ) 116 Lingua : 272 -313 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. All quantifiers are not equal: The case of focus. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 42. 171–187.

    Szabolcsi Anna. , 'All quantifiers are not equal: The case of focus ' (1994 ) 42 Acta Linguistica Hungarica : 171 -187 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Szabolcsi, Anna. 1997. Strategies for scope taking. In A. Szabolcsi (ed.) Ways of scope taking (SLAP 65). Dordrecht: Kluwer. 109–154.

    Szabolcsi Anna. , '', in Ways of scope taking (SLAP 65) , (1997 ) -.

  • Szabolcsi, Anna. 2010. Quantification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Szabolcsi Anna. , '', in Quantification , (2010 ) -.

  • Tunstall, Susan. 1998. Interpreting quantifiers. Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Tunstall Susan. , '', in Interpreting quantifiers , (1998 ) -.

  • Zhou, Peng and Stephen Crain. 2009. Scope assignment in child language: Evidence from the acquisition of Chinese. Lingua 119. 973–988.

    Crain S. , 'Scope assignment in child language: Evidence from the acquisition of Chinese ' (2009 ) 119 Lingua : 973 -988 .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Katalin É. Kiss,
Ferenc Kiefer

Editor: Éva Dékány

Technical Editor: Zoltán G. Kiss

Review Editor: Beáta Gyuris

Editorial Board

  • Anne Abeillé
  • Željko Bošković
  • Marcel den Dikken
  • Hans-Martin Gärtner
  • Elly van Gelderen
  • Anders Holmberg
  • Katarzyna Jaszczolt
  • István Kenesei
  • Anikó Lipták
  • Katalin Mády
  • Gereon Müller
  • Csaba Pléh
  • Giampaolo Salvi
  • Irina Sekerina
  • Péter Siptár
  • Gregory Stump
  • Peter Svenonius
  • Anne Tamm
  • Akira Watanabe
  • Jeroen van de Weijer

Acta Linguistica Academica
Address: Benczúr u. 33. HU–1068 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (+36 1) 351 0413; (+36 1) 321 4830 ext. 154
Fax: (36 1) 322 9297
E-mail: ala@nytud.mta.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Arts and Humanities Citation Index
  • Bibliographie Linguistique/Linguistic Bibliography
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • Linguistics Abstracts
  • Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts
  • MLA International Bibliography
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • LinguisList

 

Acta Linguistica Hungarica
Language English
Size  
Year of
Foundation
1951
Publication
Programme
changed title
Volumes
per Year
 
Issues
per Year
 
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1216-8076 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2624 (Online)