View More View Less
  • 1 Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary
Full access

English represents stress-sensitive consonant lenition systems, in which the onsets of stressed syllables (as well as word-initial consonants) tend to resist diachronic lenition, resulting in synchronic alternations between foot-initial and foot-internal variants. However, there is empirical evidence that a further distinction needs to be drawn between two subtypes of foot-internal positions: one which is weak proper, included within a bimoraic domain (corresponding to the “minimal foot” in prosodic approaches); and a less weak (“semi-weak”) position outside that minimal domain. Crucially, lenition outside the domain implies lenition within, and no cases of lenition in semi-weak only are on record. The paper uses the representations of Strict CV Phonology to capture the equivalence of two forms of the “minimal foot” (the CVCV sequence and the long-vowelled heavy syllable) and to connect this “bimoraicity” of the domain to the implications in consonant lenition, a benefit moraic theory does not offer. At the same time, it properly predicts the non-existence of the unattested lenition pattern.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Balogné Bérces, Katalin. 2005. Strict CV phonology and the English cross-word puzzle. Doctoral dissertation. Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balogné Bérces, Katalin. 2011a. Pretonic unstressed syllables in English. Paper presented at the 19th Manchester Phonology Meeting, Manchester.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balogné Bérces, Katalin. 2011b. Weak and semiweak phonological positions in English. Journal of English Studies 9. 7596.

  • Balogné Bérces, Katalin and Patrick Honeybone. 2012. Splitting ‘intervocalic’: Expanding the typology of lenition environments. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 59. 2748.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Broadbent, Judith M. 2008. t-to-r in West Yorkshire English. English Language and Linguistics 12. 141168.

  • Buchstaller, Isabelle, Karen Corrigan, Anders Homberg, Patrick Honeybone and Warren Maguire. 2013. T-to-R and the Northern Subject Rule: Questionnaire-based spatial, social and structural linguistics. English Language and Linguistics 17. 85128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burzio, Luigi. 1994. Principles of English stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bye, Patrik and Paul de Lacy. 2008. Metrical influences on fortition and lenition. In de Carvalho et al. (2008, 173206).

  • de Carvalho, Joaquim Brandão, Tobias Scheer and Philippe Ségéral (eds.). 2008. Lenition and fortition. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, Stuart. 2003. The footing of dactylic sequences in American English. In T. Homna, M. Okazaki, T. Tabata and S. Tanaka (eds.) A new century of phonology and phonological theory. Tokyo: Kaitakusha. 277289.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, Stuart. 2005. “Capitalistic” vs. “militaristic”: The paradigm uniformity effect reconsidered. In L. Downing, T. A. Hall and R. Raffelsiefen (eds.) Paradigms in phonological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 107121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, John and Jonathan Kaye. 1990. A tale of two cities: London glottalling and New York City tapping. The Linguistic Review 7. 251274.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hasenclever, Max. 1904. Der Dialekt der Gemeinde Wermelskirchen. Marburg: Elwert.

  • Holsinger, David. 2008. Germanic prosody and consonantal strength. In de Carvalho et al. (2008, 273300).

  • Honeybone, Patrick. 2010. A non-predictable template with subsegmental specification: Diddificating truncation in Liverpool English. Paper presented at OCP7, Nice.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hooper, Joan B. 1978. Constraints on schwa deletion in American English. In J. Fisiak (ed.) Recent developments in historical phonology. The Hague: Mouton. 183207.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jensen, John T. 1987. English stop allophones in metrical theory. In T. Gamkrelidze (ed.) Proceedings XIth ICPhs, volume 2. Tallin: Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR. 153156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jensen, John T. 2000. Against ambisyllabicity. Phonology 17. 187235.

  • Kahn, Daniel. 1976. Syllable-based generalisations in English phonology. Doctoral dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA. Published by Garland Press, New York, 1980.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Kreidler, Charles W. 1989. The pronunciation of English. A course book in phonology. Oxford & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

  • Lass, Roger. 1984. Phonology. An introduction to basic concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lowenstamm, Jean. 1996. CV as the only syllable type. In J. Durand and B. Laks (eds.) Current trends in phonology. Models and methods. Salford: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford Publications. 419441.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oostendorp, Marc von. 2000. Phonological projection: A theory of feature content and prosodic structure. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ségéral, Philippe and Tobias Scheer. 1999. The Coda Mirror. Ms. Université de Paris 7 and Université de Nice. (Slightly less evolved English version of Ségéral and Scheer 2001.).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ségéral, Philippe and Tobias Scheer. 2001. La Coda-Miroir. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 96. 107152.

  • Ségéral, Philippe and Tobias Scheer. 2008. The Coda Mirror, stress and positional parameters. In de Carvalho et al. (2008, 483518).

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. Syllables. In H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.) The structure of phonological representations, part II. Dordrecht, Cinnaminson: Foris. 337383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steriade, Donca. 2000. Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary. In M. B. Broe and J. B. Pierrehumbert (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 313335.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Szigetvári, Péter. 1999. VC Phonology: A theory of consonant lenition and phonotactics. Doctoral dissertation. Eötvös Loránd University/MTA, Budapest.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Withgott, Mary M. 1982. Segmental evidence for phonological constituents. Doctoral dissertation. University of Texas, Austin.