This paper argues that Czech verbal prefixes alternate between two states, roughly corresponding to the traditional notions ‘free’ and ‘bound’. The distinction, however, is not reflected in the separability of the prefix and the verb; it is reflected in vowel length. Main evidence for the claim is drawn from the way vowel length of adpositions is treated Czech internally and from a comparison to Norwegian. Theoretically, we implement the alternation as a phrasal movement of the prefix from a VP internal position (where the prefix behaves as bound) to a VP external position, drawing on Taraldsen’s (2000) proposal for Norwegian and Svenonius’s (2004b) account of prefixation in Slavic.
Abels, Klaus and Peter Muriungi. 2008. The focus marker in Kiitharaka: Syntax and semantics. Lingua 118. 687–731.
Asbury, Anna, Berit Gehrke and Veronika Hegedus. 2006. One size fits all: Prefixes, particles, adpositions and cases as members of the category. In C. Keskin (ed.) UiL OTS Yearbook 2006. Utrecht: Utrecht University. 1–17.
Babko-Malaya, Olga . 1999. Zero morphology: A study of aspect, argument structure and case. Doctoral dissertation. Rutgers University.
Biskup, Petr . 2009. Prefixes as prepositions and multiple cases. In Zybatow et al. (2009, 3–17).
Borik, Olga . 2002. Aspect and reference time (LOT Dissertation Series 64). Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap.
Boškovic, Željko . 1997. The syntax of nonfinite complementation: An economy approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caha, Pavel . 2014. The jungle of the Czech local cases: Where semantics and morphology meet. In L. Schürcks, A. Giannakidou and U. Etxeberria (eds.) The nominal structure in Slavic and beyond. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 209–236.
Caha, Pavel and Tobias Scheer. 2007. The syntax and phonology of Czech templatic morphology. Handout of a talk at FASL. http://sites.unice.fr/scheer/tobweb/papers.htm.
Caha, Pavel and Tobias Scheer. 2008. The syntax and phonology of Czech templatic morphology. In A. Antonenko, J. F. Bailyn and C. Y. Bethin (eds.) Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 16: The Stony Brook Meeting 2007. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. 68–83.
Dikken, Marcel den . 1995. Particles: On the syntax of verb–particle, triadic and causative constructions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dikken, Marcel den . 2003. When particles won’t part. Manuscript. CUNY.
Gehrke, Berit . 2008. Ps in motion: On the semantics and syntax of P elements and motion events (LOT Dissertation Series 184). Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap.
Gribanova, Vera . 2009. Phonological evidence for a distinction between Russian prepositions and prefixes. In Zybatow et al. (2009, 383–396).
Gribanova, Vera . 2015. Exponence and morphosyntactically triggered phonological processes in the Russian verbal complex. Journal of Linguistics 51. 519–561.
Grimshaw, Jane . 1990. Argument structure (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 18). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hinterhölzel, Roland . 2000. Licensing movement and stranding in the West Germanic OV languages. In Svenonius (2000, 293–326).
Hroársdóttir, Thorbjörg . 2000. Parameter change in Icelandic. In Svenonius (2000, 153–180).
Hyman, Larry, Sharon Inkelas and Galen Sibanda. 2008. Morphosyntactic correspondence in Bantu reduplication. In K. Hanson and S. Inkelas (eds.) The nature of the word. Essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 273–309.
Julien, Marit . 2002. Syntactic heads and word formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, Richard S. 1998. Overt vs. covert movement. Syntax 1. 128–191.
Koopman, Hilda and Anna Szabolcsi. 2000. Verbal complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kratzer, Angelika . 2000. Building statives. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic. Society 26. 385–399.
MacDonald, Jonathan . 2008. The syntax of inner aspect. A Minimalist perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Matushansky, Ora . 2002. On formal identity of Russian prefixes and prepositions. MIT Working Papers i. Linguistics 42. 217–253.
Migdalski, Krzysztof . 2006. The syntax of compound tenses in Slavic. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
Neeleman, Ad. 2002. Particle placement. In N. Dehé, R. Jackendoff, A. McIntyre and S. Urban (eds.) Verb-particle explorations. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 141–164.
Nilsen, Øystein . 2003. Eliminating positions. Doctoral dissertation. Utrecht University.
Procházková, Vera . 2006. Argument structure of Czech event nominals. MA thesis. University of Tromsø.
Ramchand, Gillian . 2004. Time and the event: The semantics of Russian prefixes. Nordlyd 32. 323–361.
Ramchand, Gillian . 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ramchand, Gillian and Peter Svenonius. 2002. The lexical syntax and lexical semantics of the verb–particle construction. In L. Mikkelsen and C. Potts (eds.) Proceedings of WCCFL 21. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. 387–400.
Romanova, Eugeniya . 2006. Constructing perfectivity in Russian. Doctoral dissertation. University of Tromsø.
Scheer, Tobias . 2001. The Rhythmic Law in Czech: Vowel-final prefixes. In G. Zybatow, U. Junghanns, G. Mehlhorn and L. Szucsich (eds.) Current issues in formal Slavic linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 37–48.
Starke, Michal . 2009. Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd 36. 2–6.
Svenonius, Peter . 1996. The verb–particle alternation in the Scandinavian languages. Manuscript. University of Tromsø. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000046.
Svenonius, Peter (ed.). 2000. The derivation of VO and OV. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Svenonius, Peter . 2004. Slavic prefixes and morphology: An introduction to the Nordlyd volume. Nordlyd 32. 205–253.
Svenonius, Peter . 2004. Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP. Nordlyd 32. 205–253.
Taraldsen, Tarald . 2000. V-movement and VP-movement in derivations leading to VO-order. In Svenonius (2000, 97–122).
Taraldsen, Tarald . 2010. The nanosyntax of Nguni noun class prefixes and concords. Lingua 120. 1522–1548.
Tatevosov, Sergei . 2006. Severing perfectivity from the verb. Scando-Slavica 57. 216–244.
Wiland, Bartosz . 2013. Paths in remnant movement: A single solution to three problems in the Polish OVS syntax. In C. Kan, C. Moore-Cantwell and R. Staubs (eds.) Proceedings of NELS 40. Amherst, MA: GLSA. 253–264.
Williams, Edwin . 2003. Representation theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ziková, Markéta . 2012. Lexical prefixes and templatic domains: Prefix lengthening in Czech. In M. Ziková and M. Docekal (eds.) Slavic Languages in Formal Grammar: Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 325–338.
Ziková, Markéta . 2016. When prosody follows syntax: Verbal stems in Czech. Linguistica Brunensia 64. 163–185.
Zwart, Jan-Wouter . 1994. Dutch is head initial. The Linguistics Review 11. 377–406.
Zybatow, Gerhild, Uwe Junghanns, Denisa Lenertova and Petr Biskup (eds.). 2009. Studies in formal Slavic phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics and information structure. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Žaucer, Rok. 2009. A VP-internal/resultative analysis of 4 “VP-external” uses of Slavic verbal prefixes. Doctoral dissertation. University of Ottawa.
Žaucer, Rok. 2013. A case for result-modifying prefixes. In A. Podobaryev (ed.) Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics 20. Ann Arbour: Michigan Slavic Publications. 290–304.