View More View Less
  • 1 University of Potsdam
Full access

The article focuses on comparative complementisers in comparative clauses expressing inequality in various languages, with particular attention paid to their role as lexicalising negative polarity. I argue that the relevant property follows from degree semantics, in that the comparative subclause encodes the inequality of the degree expressed by a matrix clausal element and the one expressed by the comparative operator. Just like ordinary negation, this has to be encoded overtly; however, as it does not constitute an instance of genuine clausal negation, the property cannot be encoded by an operator, and hence must be realised on a functional head, which is either the complementiser or a separate polarity head.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abels, Klaus. 2005. Expletive negation in Russian: A conspiracy theory. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 13. 574.

  • Bacskai-Atkari, Julia. 2014a. Cyclical change in Hungarian comparatives. Diachronica 31. 465505.

  • Bacskai-Atkari, Julia. 2014b. Structural case and ambiguity in reduced comparative subclauses in English and German. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 61. 363378.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bacskai-Atkari, Julia. 2014c. The syntax of comparative constructions: Operators, ellipsis phenomena and functional left peripheries. Doctoral dissertation. Universitätsverlag Potsdam.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bacskai-Atkari, Julia. 2015. Syntactic features, overtness, and functional left peripheries. Paper presented at the Syntax–Semantics Colloquium, Potsdam, Universität Potsdam, 20 October 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bacskai-Atkari, Julia and Gergely Kántor. 2011. Elliptical comparatives revisited. In V. Kimmelman, N. Korotkova and I. Yanovich (eds.) Proceedings of MOSS 2: Moscow Syntax and Semantics (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 75). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1934.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bacskai-Atkari, Julia and Gergely Kántor. 2012. Deletion in Hungarian, Finnish and Estonian comparatives. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics 1. 4466.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bayer, Josef and Ellen Brandner. 2008. On wh-head-movement and the Doubly-Filled-Comp Filter. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. 8795.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borsley, Robert D. and Ewa Jaworska. 1981. Some remarks on equatives and related phenomena. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 13. 79108.

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmajian (eds.) Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press. 71132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Negative morphemes. In M. S. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (eds.) WALS Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eggs, Frederike. 2006. Die Grammatik von als und wie. Tübingen: Narr.

  • Espinal, M. Teresa. 2000. Expletive negation, negative concord and feature checking. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 8. 4769.

  • Jäger, Agnes. 2010. Der Komparativzyklus und die Position der Vergleichspartikeln. Linguistische Berichte 224. 467493.

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 2002. Comparative Deletion and optimality in syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20. 553621.

  • Klima, Edward S. 1964. Negation in English. In J. A. Fodor and J. J. Katz (eds.) The structure of language. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. 246323.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ladusaw, William. 1979. Negative polarity as inherent scope. Doctoral dissertation. University of Texas, Austin.

  • Lipold, Günter. 1983. Möglichkeiten der Komparation in den deutschen Dialekten. In W. Besch et al. (eds.) Dialektologie: Ein Handbuch zur deutschen und allgemeinen Dialektforschung. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 12321241.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • González i Planas, Francesca. 2014. On quotative recomplementation: Between pragmatics and morphosyntax. Lingua 146. 3974.

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.) Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 281337.

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In A. Belletti (ed.) Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 223251.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roberts, Ian. 2005. Principles and parameters in a VSO language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Seuren, Pieter. 1973. The comparative. In F. Kiefer and N. Ruwet (eds.) Generative grammar in Europe. Dodrecht: Kluwer. 528564.

  • Stolz, Thomas. 2013. Competing comparative constructions in Europe. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.

  • Weise, Oskar. 1918. Die vergleichenden Konjunktionen in den deutschen Mundarten. Zeitschrift für deutsche Mundarten 13. 169181.

  • Ziemer, Hermann. 1884. Vergleichende Syntax der Indogermanischen Comparation insbesondere der Comparationscasus der indogermanischen Sprachen und sein Ersatz. Berlin: Dümmler.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation