We address the ongoing debate between raising and in-situ analyses of relative superlatives. We present some arguments in favor of the in-situ analysis of DP-internal relative superlatives: first, the in-situ analysis accounts straightforwardly for the use of the definite article; we show that a recent attempt to explain the use of THE under the raising analysis makes incorrect predictions. Secondly, there is evidence that only a sub-type of relative superlatives, that have certain peculiar properties, rely on raising; crucially, these superlatives lack the definite article. This divide among relative superlatives has first been proposed by Pancheva & Tomaszewicz (2012) for certain adnominal superlatives. We add another context which supports this divide — the predicative context, where relative superlatives which can only be interpreted by raising to the vicinity of the correlate can be found. Based on new data coming from Romanian, we show that these predicative superlatives have different properties from DP-internal relative superlatives, which can be explained if the former involve raising and the latter are interpreted DP-internally.
Beaver, David . 2001. Presupposition and assertion in Dynamic Semantics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David . 2012. Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bowers, John . 1969. Surface structure interpretation in English superlatives. Manuscript. MIT.
Chereches, Anca (ed.). 2012. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 22. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Coppock, Elizabeth and David Beaver. 2012. Weak uniqueness: The only difference between definites and indefinites. In Chereches (2012, 527–544).
Coppock, Elizabeth and David Beaver. 2014. A superlative argument for a minimal theory of definiteness. In T. Snider, S. D’Antonio and M. Weigand (eds.) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 24. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. 177–198.
Croitor, Blanca . 2012. Acordul în limba româna [Agreement in Romanian]. Bucharest: Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti.
Croitor, Blanca and Carmen Mîrzea-Vasile. 2014. Agreement of Romanian superlative adverbs and adjectives. Paper presented at The Interfaces of Adjective and Adverb in Romance and English conference, Graz, June 5–7, 2014.
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen . 2013. Strong indefinites are not quantificational: Proportional MANY vs. MOST. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 58. 401–417.
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen and Ion Giurgea. 2015. Le plus and (the) most. On the proportional reading of MANYsuperl across languages. Paper presented at the 37. Jahrestagung der DGfS, Leipzig, March 2015 conference and at the Incontro di Grammatica Generativa conference, Perugia, February 2015.
Emonds, Joe . 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.
Farkas, Donka and Katalin É. Kiss. 2000. On the comparative and absolute readings of superlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18. 417–455.
Gawron, Jean Mark . 1995. Comparatives, superlatives, and resolution. Linguistics and Philosophy 18. 333–380.
Giurgea, Ion . 2013. Originea articolului posesiv-genitival al si evolutia sistemului demonstrativelor în română [The origin of the possessive-genitival article al and the evolution of the system of demonstratives in Romanian]. Bucharest: Editura Muzeului National al Literaturii Române.
Grevisse, Maurice . 2008. Le bon usage. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Hackl, Martin . 2009. On the grammar and processing of proportional quantifiers: most versus more than half. Natural Language Semantics 17. 63–98.
Heim, Irene . 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Ms. University of Texas.
Heim, Irene . 1999. Notes on superlatives. Ms. MIT.
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jackendoff, Ray . 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Krasikova, Sveta . 2012. Definiteness in superlatives. In M. Aloni, V. Kimmelman, F. Roelofsen, G. Sassoon, K. Schulz and M. Westera (eds.) Logic, language and meaning. 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 19–21, 2011. Revised selected papers. Berlin: Springer. 411–420.
Matushansky, Ora . 2008. On the attributive nature of superlatives. Syntax 11. 26–90.
Pancheva, Roumyana and Barbara Tomaszewicz. 2012. Cross-linguistic differences in superlative movement out of nominal phrases. In N. Arnett and R. Bennett (eds.) Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 292–302.
Rooth, Mats . 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1. 75–116.
Ross, John Robert . 1964. A partial grammar of English superlatives. MA thesis. University of Pennsylvania.
Sharvit, Yael and Penka Stateva. 2002. Superlative expressions, context, and focus. Linguistics and Philosophy 25. 453–505.
Shen, Zheng . 2014. On the relative readings with NP internal focus of superlatives. In R. E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.) Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Arizona State University. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 409–418.
Szabolcsi, Anna . 1986. Comparative superlatives. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8. 245–266.
Szabolcsi, Anna . 2012. Compositionality without word boundaries: (the) more and (the) most. In Chereches (2012, 1–25).
Teodorescu, Viorica 2009. Modification in the noun phrase. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.
Williams, Edwin . 1982. Another argument that passive is transformational. Linguistic Inquiry 13. 160–163.
Živanović, Sašo . 2007. Kvantifikacijski vidiki logične oblike v minimlistični teoriji jezika [Quantificational aspects of LF]. Doctoral dissertation. Univerza v Ljubljani.