View More View Less
  • 1 Bled Institute
  • 2 Centre for General Linguistics (ZAS), Berlin
Full access

Across languages, the morpheme expressing conjunction frequently has other uses as well. Several linguists have attempted to unify all uses of conjunction morphemes under one general algebraic scheme. We argue in favor of a more limited unification and propose a universal decomposition of conjunction structures: We propose that there exist both a “nominal” e-type and “verbal” or “clausal” t-type junctor. Our account is substantiated with evidence from synchronic typology and diachrony. Our analysis hinges on a generalisation, that e-conjunctors, but crucially not t-conjunctors, may have non-conjunctional quantificational meanings. Historically, we invoke the same principle to explain the change in the conjunction grammar of Indo-European which uniformly abandoned the e- and adopted the t-level conjunctions across the board.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bade, Nadine. 2015. Obligatory presupposition triggers in discourse. Doctoral dissertation. Universität Tübingen.

  • Beekes, Robert. 2010. Etymological dictionary of Greek. Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series, Leiden: Brill.

  • Bianchi, Valentina. 2015. Some thoughts on the derivation of polar questions. Paper presented at Questions and Disjunctions: Syntax, Semantics, Typology, University of Vienna, October 1, 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boisacq, Émile. 1916. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: étudiée dans ses rapports avec les autres langues indo-européennes. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cable, Seth. 2010. The grammar of Q: Q-particles, wh-movement, and pied-piping. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Carlson, Robert. 1994. A grammar of Supyire. No. 14 in Mouton Grammar Library, Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Chelliah, Shobhana Lakshmi. 1997. A grammar of Meithei. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.

  • Chelliah, Shobhana Lakshmi. 2009. Semantic role to new information in Meithei. In J. Bardal and S. Chelliah (eds.) The role of semantic, pragmatic, and discourse factors in the development of case. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 337400.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6. 339405.

  • Cyffer, Norbert. 2009. Negation patterns in Kanuri. In N. Cyffer, E. Ebermann and G. Ziegelmeyer (eds.) Negation patterns in West African languages and beyond. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 7192.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dikken, Marcel den. 2006. Either-float and the syntax of co-or-dination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24. 689749.

  • Dixon, Robert Malcolm Ward. 1977. A grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Fox, Danny. 2007. Free choice and scalar implicatures. In U. Sauerland and P. Stateva (eds.) Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics. London: Palgrave Macmilan. 71120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Geldner, Karl F. 1896. Avesta, the sacred books of the Parsis. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

  • Gil, David. 2005. Conjunctions and universal quantifiers. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil and B. Comrie (eds.) The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, chap. 56. 230233.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gil, David. 2013. Conjunctions and universal quantifiers. In M. S. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (eds.) WALS Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (http://wals.info/)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gruzdeva, Ekaterina. 1998. Nivkh. No. 111 in Languages of the world, Munich: Lincom Europa.

  • Hagstrom, Paul. 1998. Decomposing questions. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.

  • Halpert, Claire. 2012. Argument licensing and agreement in Zulu. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.

  • Hamel, Anton Gerardus van (ed.). 1933. Compert Con Culainn and other stories. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

  • Hancock, W. Neilson, Thaddeus O’Mahony, Alexander George Richey and Robert Atkinson (eds.). 1865–1901. Ancient laws of Ireland. Dublin: Stationery Office.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. Coordinating constructions. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Coordination. Language Typology and Syntactic Description 2. 151.

  • Hellwig, Oliver. 2010–2011. DCS–The digital corpus of Sanskrit. Heidelberg: University of Heidelberg.

  • Hendrickson, George L. and Harry M. Hubbell. 1939. Brutus. Orator. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Hutchinson, John P. 1981. The Kanuri language. Boston: Boston University African Studies Center.

  • König, Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.

  • Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju. 2003. The Dravidian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kroeger, Paul R. 2005. Analyzing grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Kuroda, Shige-yuki. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.

  • Lehmann, Thomas. 1993. A grammar of modern Tamil. Pondicherry: Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture.

  • McNally, Louise. 1993. Comitative coordination: A case study in group formation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11. 347379.

  • Mitrovic, Moreno. 2013. Configurational change in Indo-European coordinate construction. In A. M. Martins and A. Cardoso (eds.) Word order change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. In press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitrovic, Moreno. 2014. Morphosyntactic atom of propositional logic. Doctoral dissertation. University of Cambridge.

  • Mitrovic, Moreno. 2016. A typology of repetitive(ly strong) disjunctions. Paper presented at Disjunction Days, ZAS, Berlin, 2–3 June, 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitrovic, Moreno and Uli Sauerland. 2014. Decomposing coordination. In J. Iyer and L. Kusmer (eds.) Proceedings of NELS 44. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts. 3952.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Munn, Alan. 1993. Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures. Doctoral dissertation. University of Maryland.

  • Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. and Galina A. Otaina. 2013. A syntax of the Nivkh language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Nooten, Barend A. van and Gary B. Holland (eds.). 1994. Rig Veda: A metrically restored text. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Panfilov, Vladimir Zinovevic. 1965. Grammatika nivxskogo jazyka. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.

    • Export Citation
  • Paperno, Denis. 2012. Semantics and syntax of non-standard coordination. Doctoral dissertation. UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif.

  • Partee, Barbara H. and Mats Rooth. 1983. Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.) Meaning, use and the interpretation of language. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 361383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Paul, Pooja. 2015. Malayalam Ceyy-support and its relation to event and argument structure. In L. Nash and P. Samvelian (eds.) Approaches to complex predicates. Leiden: Brill. 175211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Poser, William John. 1984. The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.

  • Refsing, Kirsten. 1986. The Ainu language: The morphology and syntax of the Shizunai dialect. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.

  • Rennison, John R. 1997. Koromfe. London: Routledge.

  • Roberts, John R. 1987. Amele. London: Croom Helm.

  • Seiler, Walter. 1985. Imonda, a Papuan language. Canberra: Research School on Pacific Linguistics.

  • Shimoyama, Junko. 2001. WH-constructions in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation. UMass at Amherst.

  • Shimoyama, Junko. 2006. Indeterminate phrase quantification in Japanese. Natural Language Semantics 14. 139173.

  • Slade, Benjamin Martin. 2011. Formal and philological inquiries into the nature of interrogatives, indefinites, disjunction, and focus in Sinhala and other languages. Doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stirling, Lesley. 1993. Switch-reference and discourse representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Szabolcsi, Anna. 2015. What do quantifier particles do? Linguistics and Philosophy 38. 159204.

  • Szabolcsi, Anna, James Doh Whang and Vera Zu. 2014. Quantifier words and their multifunctional(?) parts. Language and Linguistics 15. 115155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tamura, Suzuko. 2000. The Ainu language. Tokyo: Sanseido.

  • Tang, Gladys and Prudence Lau. 2012. Syntax: Coordination and subordination. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach and B. Woll (eds.) Sign language: An international handbook. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 340364.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thurneysen, Rudolf. 2003. A grammar of Old Irish. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.

  • Wälchli, Bernhard. 2009. Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Wilson, Horace Hayman. 2002. Ṛgveda Saṃhita. Varanasi: Indica.

  • Winter, Yoad. 1996. A unified semantic treatment of singular NP coordination. Linguistics and Philosophy 19. 337391.

  • Yatsushiro, Kazuko. 2009. The distribution of quantificational suffixes in Japanese. Natural Language Semantics 17. 141173.

  • Zhang, Niina Ning. 2010. Coordination in syntax. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.