View More View Less
  • a University of Debrecen
  • | b University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Böszörményi út 138, Hungary
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $878.00

The aim of the research is to reveal the most important influencing factors that lead to consumers’ acceptance of personalised nutrition based on genetic testing. A nationwide representative questionnaire-based consumer survey was carried out involving 500 people in Hungary in 2014. The results show that consumers are divided over the new technology. Only 27.0% of the respondents have a positive attitude toward the new possibility, and they would be glad to use this new service in order to stay healthy. The rate of those who would have a genetic test because they want to follow a diet tailored to their needs is very low (16.0%). Our result suggested that the most important factors in consumer preference on personalised nutrition are positive health message and perceived risk/benefits, gender, and educational level. The most important factors regarding the attitude toward genetic testing are easy usage, benefits, the agreement among experts, and educational level.

  • BIRÓ, GY. (2004): Új funkcionális élelmiszer alkotórészek –A rosszindulatú daganatok és az oxidatív degradáció. (New functional food components –Malignant tumours and oxidative degradation.) Édesipar, 50(4), 137146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GERMAN, J.B., WATZKE, H.J. (2004): Personalizing foods for health and delight. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. F., 3(4), 145151.

  • HARLAND, J.I. (2005): Nutrition and genetics. Mapping individual health. ILSI Concise Monograph Series. 32 p.

  • BIRÓ, GY. (2006): Táplálkozás és genetika. Az egészség feltérképezése. Élelmiszervizsgálati közlemények, 52(1), 3042.

  • KUSSMANN, M., FAY, L.B. (2008): Nutrigenomics and personalized nutrition. Pers. Med., 5(5), 447455.

  • MEHROTRA, I. (2004): A perspective on developing and marketing food products to meet individual needs of population segments. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. F., 3(4), 142144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MUTCH, D.M., WAHLI, W., WILLIAMSON, G. (2005): Nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics: the emerging faces of nutrition. FASEB J., 19, 16021616.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RONTELTAP, A. (2008): Public acceptance of nutrigenomics-based personalised nutrition. Exploring the future with experts and consumers. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands. 165 pages.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • STEWART-KNOX, B.J., BUNTING, B.P., GILPIN, S., PARR, H.J., PINHAO, S., STRAIN, J.J., DE ALMEIDA, D.V., GIBNEY, M. (2009): Attitudes toward genetic testing and personalized nutrition in a representative sample of European consumers. Brit. J. Nutr., 101, 982989.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SZABÓ, S.A. (2013): Táplálkozásgenomika a sportban. (Nutrigenomicsin sport.) Magyar sporttudományi szemle, 14(53), 4044.

  • SZAKÁLY, Z. (2011): Táplálkozásmarketing. (Nutrition marketing.) Mezogazda Kiadó, Budapest. 216 pages.

  • WHO (2004): The global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. WHO Press, Geneva, 18 pages.

  • WHO (2014): World Health Statistics 2014. WHO Press, Geneva

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Jan 2021 5 0 0
Feb 2021 6 0 0
Mar 2021 6 1 1
Apr 2021 5 0 0
May 2021 5 0 0
Jun 2021 3 0 0
Jul 2021 0 0 0