View More View Less
  • a Fornetti Kft, H-6000 Kecskemét, Városföld 92, Hungary
  • b National Food Chain Safety Office,, H-1024 Budapest, Keleti Károly utca 24., Hungary
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $878.00

In recent years, there have been many changes in the food market, which have greatly transformed our approach to food chain supervision. The increasing complexity of the food chain (e.g. globalization of food trade, expansion of raw materials and additives, technical advancement), the frequent changes in food consumption trends and the phenomenon of food crime belong to the most challenging issues for food chain control institutions. These factors require the re-evaluation of the role of consumers in the food chain. The overall aim of this research was to explore consumers’ risk perception and risk avoidance for a more efficient, targeted risk communication. In the survey 1003, face-to-face interviews were made using questionnaire. The statistical analysis of data was followed by the identification and characterization of 4 relevant target groups with cluster analysis method: disinterested youngsters (17.0%), conscious elders (39.4%), food adepts (27.5%), and soul of the family (16.1%). Results indicated, that the Hungarian society can be segmented regarding to food associated risk perception and avoidance. It has been also proven, that risk perception is influenced by demographic factors. Furthermore, we have also managed to conclude that efficient risk communication would require a well-aimed and focused communication strategy.

  • Ajzen, I. (2015): Consumer attitudes and behavior: The theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions. Riv. Econ. Agr., 70(2), 121138.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bánáti, D. & Lakner, Z. (2002): The food safety issue and the consumer behaviour in a transition economy: A case study of Hungary. Acta Alimentaria, 31, 2136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bánáti, D., Lakner, Z., Szabó, E. & KASZA, GY. (2004): Towards the understanding of the food consumers attitudes and choices. Hungarian Agricultural Research, 2944.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EC (2000): White paper on food safety. European Commission, 52 pages.

  • EC (2002): Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. OJ EC, L 31, 01/02/2002, P. 00010024.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frewer, L. (2004): The public and effective risk communication. Toxicol. Lett., 149(1), 391397.

  • Frewer, L.J., Howard, C., Hedderly, D. & Shepherd, R. (1996): What determines trust in information about foodrelated risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk anal., 16(4), 473486.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hansen, J., Holm, I., Frewer, L., Robinson, P. & Sandoe, P. (2003): Beyond the knowledge deficit: Recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite, 41(2), 111121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HCSO (2014): Population by gender (2001–). Source: http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xstadat/xstadat_eves/i_wdsd003a.html (last accessed: 22 December 2017)

  • Kasza, GY. (2010): Kockázatkommunikáció az élelmiszerbiztonság területén. (Risk communication in the field of food safety.) PhD Dissertation, Budapesti Corvinus University, 158 pages.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keleman, D.R. (2002): The politics of bureaucratic structure and the new European agencies. West Eur. Polit., 25(4), 93118.

  • Klinke, A. & Renn, O. (2002): A new approach to risk evaluation and management: risk-based, precaution-based, and discourse-based strategies. Risk anal., 22(6), 10711094.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laczay, P. (2012): Élelmiszer-higiénia, élelmiszer-biztonság. (Food hygiene, food safety.) Magyar Tudomány, 173(1), 410.

  • Lakner, Z., Hajdu, I., Bánáti, D., Szabó, E. & Kasza, GY. (2006): The application of multivariate statistical methods for understanding food consumer behaviour. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 105, 5970.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lakner, Z. & KASZA, GY. (2009): Food industry: Risk factory in the risk society. -in: Millar, K., West, P.H. & Nerlich, B. (Eds) Ethical futures: Bioscience and food horizons, EurSafe 2009, Nottingham, UK, 24 July 2009, pp. 251258.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Macqueen, J.B. (1967): Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. University of California Press, pp. 281297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mcintosh, W.A., Christensen, L.B. & Acuff, G.R. (1994): Perceptions of risks of eating undercooked meat and willingness to change cooking practices. Appetite, 22, 8396.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miles, S. & Frewer, L.J. (2001): Investigating specific concerns about different food hazards –higher and lower order attributes. Food Qual. Prefer., 12, 4761.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Prades, J., Farré, J. & Gonzalo, J.L. (2014): Journalists and bloggers. Professional identities and practices in food risk/benefits communication in Spain. Communication & Society, 27, 121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Raab, C.A. & Woodburn, M.J. (1997): Changing risk perceptions and food handling practices of Oregon household food preparers. J. Consum. Stud. Home Econ., 21, 117130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Redmond, E.C. & Griffith, C.J. (2003): Consumer food handling in the home: a review of food safety studies. J. Food Protect., 66(1), 130161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schultz, F., Utz, S. & Göritz, A. (2011): Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relat. Rev., 37, 2027.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Starr, C. (1969): Social benefits versus technological risks. Science. 165. 12321238.

  • Verbeke, W. (2008): Impact of communication on consumers’ food choices: Plenary lecture. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 67(3), 281288.

  • Verbeke, W., Frewer, L.J., Scholderer, J. & De Brabander, H.F. (2007): Why consumers behave as they do with respect to food safety and risk information. Anal. Chim. Acta, 586(1), 27.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vos, E. (2000): EU food safety regulation in the aftermath of the BSE crisis. J. Consum. Policy, 23, 227255.

 

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

  • Impact Factor (2019): 0.458
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 0.212
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 27
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q3 Food Science
  • Impact Factor (2018): 0.547
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 0.24
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 25
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q3 Food Science

Language: English
Founded in 1972
Publication: One volume of four issues annually
Publication Programme: 2019: Vol. 48
Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • ASCA
  • Linguistics Abstracts
  • Biological Abstracts
  • BIOSIS Previews
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Chemical Abstracts
  • Current Contents: Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
  • Elsevier Science Navigator
  • Global Health
  • Index Veterinarius
  • Science Citation Index
  • Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch)
  • SCOPUS
  • The ISI Alerting Services

 

Subscribers can access the electronic version of every printed article.

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Salgó, András

Co-ordinating Editor(s) Tóth-Markus

Co-ordinating Editor(s) Marianna

Co-editor(s): A. Halász

       Editorial Board

L. Abrankó (Budapest), J. Baranyi (Norwich), I. Bata-Vidács (Budapest), J. Beczner (Budapest), Gy. Biró (Budapest), A. Blázovics (Budapest), F. Capozzi (Bologna), M. Carcea (Rome), Zs. Cserhalmi (Budapest), M. Dalla Rosa (Bologna), I. Dalmadi (Budapest), K. Demnerova (Prague), Muying Du (Chongqing), S. N. El (Izmir), S. B. Engelsen (Copenhagen), E. Gelencsér (Budapest), V. M. Gómez-López (Murcia), J. Hardi (Osijek), N. Ilić (Novi Sad), D. Knorr (Berlin), H. Köksel (Ankara), R. Lásztity (Budapest), K. Liburdi (Cork), M. Lindhauer (Detmold), M.-T. Liong (Penang), M. Manley (Stellenbosch), M. Mézes (Gödöllő), Á. Németh (Budapest), Q. D. Nguyen (Budapest), L. Nyström (Zürich), V. Piironen (Helsinki), A. Pino (Catania), M. Rychtera (Prague), K. Scherf (München), R. Schönlechner (Wien), A. Sharma (Mumbai), A. Szarka (Budapest), M. Szeitzné Szabó (Budapest), L. Varga (Mosonmagyaróvár), R. Venskutonis (Kaunas), B. Wróblewska (Olsztyn)

 

Acta Alimentaria
Central Food Research Institute
Herman Ottó út 15.
H-1022 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 356 4673 or 355 8244 ext. 179
Fax: (36 1) 356 4673
E-mail: actaalim@cfri.hu