Author:
Authors:
,
,
, and
Annamária Babos
annamaria.babos@gmail.com
Annamária Babos
PhD student. Department of Urban Planning and Design, BME Műegyetem rkp. 3, H-1111 Budapest , Hungary
Search for other papers by Annamária Babos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Annamária Babos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Julianna Szabó
szabojuliannaphd@gmail.com
Julianna Szabó
PhD, associate professor. BME Műegyetem rkp. 3, H-1111 Budapest , Hungary
Search for other papers by Julianna Szabó in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julianna Szabó in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Annamária Orbán
aorban@eik.bme.hu
Annamária Orbán
PhD, associate professor. Department of Sociology and Communication/Department of Urban Planning and Design, BME, Egry J. u. 1, H-1111, Budapest , Hungary
Search for other papers by Annamária Orbán in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Annamária Orbán in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Melinda Benkő
benko@urb.bme.hu
Melinda Benkő
PhD, habil. associate professor. Department of Urban Planning and Design, BME Műegyetem rkp. 3, H-1111 Budapest , Hungary
Search for other papers by Melinda Benkő in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Melinda Benkő in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
The European urban areas are growing fast, with many contemporary housing forms. Among these, co-housing forms related to sharing have become a key issue for urban housing development. These housing forms are analysed (their physical and social characteristics or effects) in more and more publications, without a common terminology of this interdisciplinary research field. In our study, based on the overview of existing definitions, characteristics we introduce a comprehensive sharing based categorization that could be valuable for terms and projects, as well. With the note, that the social dimension of sharing methods would not exist without the physical ones, because in co-housing the shared space is the basic criteria. In this paper, we focus on three groups of the social fields of sharing related to housing: the shared creation, the shared tenure, and the shared activities. We conclude the structural approach of our overview unravels new perspectives for the classification of housing forms. Based on our categorization and methodology, we recommend the development of a sharing based scalable classification that measures projects consistent and comparable.
Összefoglaló. A városias, beépített területek aránya Európa szerte folyamatosan növekszik, ennek következtében kortárs városi lakhatási formák is teret nyernek. A megosztáshoz kötődő, úgynevezett co-housing formák a kortárs városi lakófejlesztések jelentős részét képzik. Éppen ezért egyre több elemzés és publikáció születik a témában (például a fizikai és társadalmi jellemzőikről vagy azok hatásairól), azonban a lakhatás kutatási területén nincs egyetértés a kifejezések és definíciók használatában. A következő tanulmányban egy, a lakhatási formákat megosztás alapján rendszerező kategorizáció kerül bemutatásra, melynek elméleti és gyakorlati haszna is lehet. A kategorizáció a meglévő kifejezésekre, definíciókra és jellemzőkre egyaránt épít. A co-housing lakhatás alapvető feltétele a – változó méretű és minőségű – megosztott tér, így a társadalmi dimenziók minden esetben kötődnek egy fajta tériséghez is. A lakhatási formákban jelenlévő társadalmi és fizikai dimenziók együttes vizsgálata nem képezi jelen kutatás tárgyát, a társadalmi típusúakra koncentrál: a megosztott létrehozásra, tulajdonlásra és a tevékenységekre. Megállapítható, hogy a kutatás során alkalmazott rendszerezett áttekintés új irányvonalakra mutatott rá a lakhatási formák osztályozásának területén. A tanulmányban tárgyalt megosztás-alapú kategorizálásra és módszertanra alapozva egy, a megosztásra épülő és skálázható osztályozás kidolgozása javasolt, melyben a projektek mérése és összehasonlítása egységes módon történhet.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
Arc en reve Centre d’Architecture 2009 Arc en reve Centre d’Architecture: New Forms of Collective Housing in Europe. Birkhauer, Basel 2009.
-
Atkinson–Blandy 2005 Atkinson, R – Blandy, S: Introduction: International Perspectives on the New Enclavism and the Rise of Gated Communities. Housing Studies 20 (2005) 2. 177–186.
-
Babos 2019a Babos, Annamária: COLLECTIVE REUSE – Co- housing Developments in the Service of Preservation of the Built Heritage. In: Places and Technologies. Ed.: Molnár, Tamás et al. Pécsi Tudományegyetem Műszaki és Informatikai Kar, Pécs 2019. 117–127.
-
Babos 2019b Babos, Annamária: Werkpalast CoHousing: Case Study of Collective Reuse of a Prefabricated School Building. In: Facing Post-Socialist Urban Heritage Conference Proceeding. Ed.: Benkő, Melinda. Urb/ bme, Budapest 2019. 34–37.
-
Babos–Horogh–Theisler 2018 Babos, Annamária – Horogh, Petra – Theisler, K Katalin: Co-housing. Példák Bécsben és a közösségi együttélés lehetőségei Budapesten. Utóirat. A Régi-Új Magyar Építőművészet melléklete 18 (2018) 101. 69–76.
-
Bamford 2001 Bamford, Greg: Bringing Us Home. Cohousing and the Environmental Possibilities of Reuniting People with Neighbourhoods. Situating the Environment at the University of Queensland, Brisbane, 2001.
-
Beck 2020 Beck, A. F.: What Is Co-Housing? Developing a Conceptual Framework from the Studies of Danish Intergenerational Co-Housing. Housing Theory and Society 37 (2020) 1. 40–64.
-
Becker et al. 2015 Becker, Annette – Kienbaum, Laura – Ring, Kristien – Cachola Schmal, Peter: Building and Living in Communities – Ideas-Processes-Architecture .Birkhauser, Basel 2015.
-
Bengtsson 1998 Bengtsson, B: Tenant’s Dilemma – on Collective Action in Housing. Housing Studies 13 (1998) 1. 99– 120.
-
Bouma–Voorbij 2009 Bouma, J. – Voorbij, L.: Factors in Social Interaction in Cohousing Communities. ‘Include’ Conference, London. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/ 228748628_Factors_in_Social_Interaction_in_Cohousing_Communities (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
Brasson–Sylvette 2015 Bresson, Sabrina – Sylvette Denefle: Diversity of Self-Managed Cohousing Initiatives in France. Journal of Urban Research and Practice 8 (2015) 1.5–16.
-
Canadian Cohousing Network Canadian Cohousing Network – What is Cohouing? Available at: https://www.cohousing.ca/about- cohousing/what-is-cohousing/ (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
Chan 2010 Chan, Winnie Yuen-Pik: The Phenomenon of Building Groups (Baugruppe) in Berlin: What Changes When a Community Starts Building? Dessau Institute of Architecture 2010. Available at: https://issuu.com/ winnie/docs/thesis_book/27 (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
Chatterton 2013 Chatterton, Paul: Towards an Agenda for Post-carbon Cities: Lessons from Lilac, the UK’s First Ecological, Affordable Cohousing Community. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (2013) 5. 1654–1674.
-
Chiodelli 2015 Chiodelli, Francesco: What is Really Different between Cohousing and Gated Communities? European Planning Studies 23 (2015) 12. 2566–2581.
-
Chiodelli– Baglione 2014 Chiodelli, Francesco – Baglione Valeria: Living Together Privately: for a Cautious Reading of Cohousing. Urban Research and Practice 7 (2014) 1. 20–34.
-
Collins Dictionary’s definition Collins Dictionary –Definition of Commune .Available at: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/ dictionary/english/commune (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
Cohousing Association of the US Cohousing Association of the US Website – What is Cohousing? Available at: https://www.cohousing.org/ what-cohousing/cohousing/ (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
CoHousing Budapest Association 2019 Cohousing Budapest Association Website. Available at: https://www.cohousingbudapest.hu/ (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
Community Living Hungary 2012 Community Living Hungary Website. Available at: http://kozossegbenelni.blogspot.com/p/english.html (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
Czischke 2018 Czischke, Darinka: Collaborative Housing and Housing Providers: Towards an Analytical Framework of Multi-stakeholder Collaboration in Housing Co-production. International Journal of Housing Policy 18 (2018) 1. 55–81.
-
Daly 2017 Daly, M: Quantifying the Environmental Impact of Ecovillages and Co-Housing Communities. A Systematic Literature Review. Local Environment 22 (2017) 11. 1358–1377.
-
DASH 2013 DASH-Delft Architectural Studies on Housing:Building Together – The Architecture of Collective Private Commissions .nai010 publishers, Belgium 2013.
-
Fedrowitz–Gailing 2003 Fedrowitz, M. – Gailing, L.: Zusammen Wohnen–Gemeinschaftliche Wohnprojekte als Strategie sozialer und ökologischer Stadtentwicklung .Institut für Raumplanung Universität Dortmund Fakultät Raumplanung, Dortmund 2003. 19–25.
-
Fenster 1999 Fenster, M.: Community by Covenant, Process, and Design. Cohousing and the Contemporary Common Interest Community. Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law 15 (1999) 1. 3–54.
-
Fernández et al. 2015 Fernández, Per Aurora et al.: Why Ddensity?–Debunking the Myth of the Cubic Watermelon .a+t architecture publishers, Vitoria-Gasteiz 2005.
-
Fernández–Mozas–a+t research group 2016 Fernández, Per Aurora – Mozas, Javier – a+t research group: Form and Data – Collective Housing Projects. An Anatomical Review .a+t architecture publishers, Vitoria-Gasteiz 2016.
-
Fernández–Mozas–Ollero 2013 Fernández, Per Aurora – Mozas, Javier – Ollero, Álex S.: 10 Stories of Collective Housing – Graphical Analysis of Inspiring Masterpieces .a+t architecture publishers, Vitoria-Gasteiz 2013.
-
Field 2004 Field, Martin: Thinking about CoHousing. The Creation of Intentional Neighbourhoods .Diggers & Dreamers, London 2004.
-
Field 2017 Field, Martin: Models of Self-build and Collaborative Housing in the United Kingdom. In: Self-Build Homes – Social Discourse, Experiences and Directions. Ed.: Benson, Michaela – Hamiduddin Iqbal. JSTOR, UCL Press. 2017. 38–55.
-
Flender 2019 Flender, Simona Joscha: Do It Together – Cohousing as a Tool for Finding Better Ways of Living. Master thesis report, Lund University, 2019. Available at Issue. https://issuu.com/simonjflender/docs/ (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
Franck–Ahrentzen 1991 Franck, Karen A. – Ahrentzen, Sherry: New Households, New Housing .Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York 1991.
-
Fromm 1991 Fromm, Dorit: Collaborative Communities. Cohousing, Central Living, and Other New Forms of Housing with Shared Facilities .Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York 1991.
-
Fromm 2000 Fromm, Dorit: American Cohousing. The First Five Years. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17 (2000) 2. 94–109.
-
Gehl–Svarre 2013 Gehl, Jan – Svarre, Brigitte: How to Study Public Life .Island Press, Washington 2013.
-
Giorgi 2020 Giorgi, Emanuele: The Co-Housing Phenomenon – Environmental Alliance in Times of Changes .Springer – The Urban Book Series, Switzerland 2020.
-
Global Ecovillage Network Global Ecovillage Network–What is an Ecovillage? Available at: https://ecovillage.org/projects/ what-is-an-ecovillage/ (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
Heath et al. 2018 Heath, S. – Davies, K. – Edwards, G. – Scicluna, R. M.: Shared Housing, Shared Lives–Everyday Experiences across the Lifecourse .Routledge Advances in Sociology, New York 2018.
-
Hemmens–Hoch–Carp 1996 Hemmens, George C. – Hoch, Charles J. – Carp Jana: Under One Roof – Issues and Innovations in Shared Housing .State University of New York Press, Albany 1996.
-
Henilane 2016. Henilane, Inita: Housing concept and analysis of housing classification. Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management 4 (2016) 1. 168–178.
-
id22 2012 id22: Institute for Creative Sustainability: Experimentcity: CoHousing Cultures –Handbook for Self-organized, Community-oriented and Sustainable Housing. JOVIS, Berlin 2012.
-
Insee’s definitions Institut national de la statistique et des etudes economiques – Individual or Collective Building Definitions .Available at: https://www.insee.fr/en/ metadonnees/definition/c1808 (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
Jabareen 2006 Jabareen, Y. R.: Sustainable Urban Forms. Their Typologies, Models, and Concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26 (2006) 1. 38–52.
-
Jakobsen–Larsen 2019 Jakobsen, Peter – Larsen, Henrik Gutzon: An Alternative for Whom? The Evolution and Socioeconomy of Danish Cohousing. Urban Research and Practice 10 (2019) 4. 414–430.
-
Lang–Carriou–Czischke 2020 Lang, R. – Carriou, C. – Czischke, D.: Collaborative Housing Research (1990–2017). A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of the Field. Housing, Theory and Society 37 (2020) 1. 10–39.
-
Jarvis 2011. Saving Space, Sharing Time: Integrated Infrastructures of Daily Life in Cohousing. Environment and Planning A 43 (2011) 3. 560–577.
-
Jarvis 2015. Jarvis, H.: Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Social Architecture of Co-Housing: Evidence from the UK, USA and Australia. Urban Research and Practice 8 (2015) 1. 93–105.
-
Lapuerta 2007 Lapuerta, Jose Maria de: Collective Housing: A Manual. Actar Publishers, 2007.
-
Larousse definition Larousse – Definition of Ecoquartier or Eco-quartier. Available at: https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/ francais/%C3%A9coquartier/10910366 (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
Larsen 2019. Larsen, H. G.: Three Phases of Danish Cohousing: Tenure and the Development of an Alternative Housing form. Housing Studies 34 (2019) 8. 1349– 1371.
-
Law Insider Law Insider–Definitions of Communal Housing, Condominium and Commune .Available at: https:// www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/ (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
Leafe Christian 2003 Leafe Christian, Diana: Creating Life Together – Practical Tools to Grow Ecovillages and Intentional Communities. New Society Publishers, 2003.
-
Lee 2013 Lee, Ann Nicol: Sustainable Collective Housing – Policy and Practice for Multi-family Dwellings .Routledge, New York 2013.
-
Lietaert 2010 Lietaert, M.: Cohousing’s Relevance to Degrowth Theories. Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (2010) 6. 576–580.
-
Marckmann–Gram-Hanssen–Toke 2012 Marckmann, Bella Margrethe Mørch – Gram-Hanssen, Kirsten – Christensen, Toke Haunstrup: Sustainable Living and Co-Housing. Evidence from a Case Study of Eco-Villages. Built Environment 38 (2012) 3. 413– 429.
-
McCamant–Durrett 1988 McCamant, Kathryn – Durrett, Charles: Cohousing – A Contemporary Approach to Housing Ourselves .Habitat Press/Ten Speed Press, Berkeley, California 1988.
-
McIntosh–Gray–Maher 2010 McIntosh, J. – Gray, J. – Maher, S.: In Praise of Sharing as a Strategy for Sustainable Housing. Journal of Green Building 5 (2010) 1. 155–163.
-
Mehl 2019 Mehl, Bernhard: The Rising Trend of Co-living Spaces .Available at: https://www.coworkingresources. org/blog/coliving-spaces (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
Meltzer 2005 Meltzer, Graham: Sustainable Community. Learning from the Co-housing Model .Trafford Publishing, Victoria BC 2005. 1–17.
-
Miethauser Syndikat Miethauser Syndikat – Self-organized Living – Solidarity-based Economy! – Website. Available at: https://www.syndikat.org/en/ (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
NaCSBA 2011 National Custom and Self-Build Association. An Action Plan to Promote the Growth of Self-Build Housing. 2011. Available at: https://nacsba.org.uk/ wp-content/uploads/ 2018/08/nacsbadocs_2011_07_ anactionplanto.pdf (Acces sed 20 March 2020).
-
Neufert 1980 Neufert, Ernst: Architect’s data. Second English Edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford 1980.
-
Orbán 2006 Orbán, Annamária: Community Action for Collective Goods – An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Internal and External Solutions to Collective Action Problems – The case of Hungarian condominiums .Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2006. 72–77.
-
Ring–Eidner 2013 Ring, Kristien – Eidner, Franziska: Self made city – Berlin: Self-initiated Urban Living and Architectural Interventions. JOVIS, Berlin 2013.
-
Ruonavaara 2018 Ruonavaara, Hannu: Theory of Housing, from Housing, about Housing, Housing. Theory and Society 35 (2018) 178–192.
-
Ruiu 2014 Ruiu, L. Maria: Differences between Cohousing and Gated Communities. A Literature Review, Sociological Inquiry 84 (2014) 2. 316–335.
-
Sandu Publications Co 2014 Sandu Publications Co: Collective Housing. Gingko Press, Berkeley CA 2014.
-
Sanguinetti 2014.Sanguinetti, A.: Transformational Practices in Cohousing; Enhancing Resident’ Connection to Community and Nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 40 (2014) 86–96.
-
Sargisson 2012 Sargisson, Lucy: Second-Wave Cohousing – A Modern Utopia? Utopian Studies 23 (2012) 1. 28–56.
-
Schill–Voicu–Miller 2007 Schill, M H. – Voicu I. – Miller, J: The Condominium versus Cooperative Puzzle. An Empirical Analysis of Housing in New York City. The Journal of Legal Studies 36 (2007) 2. 275–324.
-
Scotthanson–Scotthanson 2005 Scotthanson, Chris – Scotthanson, Kelly: The Cohousing Handbook – Building Place for Community. New Society Publishers, Canada 2005.
-
Smith 2012. Smith, J. Susan: Preface and Acknowledgements. In: International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home . Ed.: Smith, J. Susan. Elsevier, Cambridge 2012. 6–7.
-
Stevenson–Baborska-Narozny–Chatterton 2016. Stevenson, F. – Baborska-Narozny, M. – Chatterton, P.: Resilience, Redundancy and Low Carbon Living: Co-producing Individual and Community Learning. Building Research & Information 44 (2016) 7. 789–803.
-
Student Co-op Homes Student Co-op Homes – the UK Federation of Student Housing Co-ops. Website, Available at: https://www. studenthomes.coop/ (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
Szabó– Babos 2019 Szabó Julianna – Babos Annamária: Co-housing: Kortárs városias közösségi lakóházak innovatív építészeti megoldásai. Utóirat. A Régi-Új Magyar Építőművészet melléklete 19 (2019) 103. 56–65.
-
Szabó–Kissfazekas–Babos 2019 Szabó, J. – Kissfazekas, K. – Babos A.: Co-housing és városi fenntarthatóság. Piaci és közösségi többlakásos fejlesztések helyválasztása a fenntarthatóság tükrében. Építés – Építészettudomány 47 (2019) 3–4. 383–403.
-
Tummers 2015a Tummers, Lidewij: Understanding Co-housing from a Planning Perspective: Why and How? Urban Research and Practice 8 (2015) 1. 64–78.
-
Tummers 2015b Tummers, Lidewij: Towards a Long-term Perspective of Self-managed Collaborative Housing Initiatives. Journal of Urban Research and Practice 8 (2015) 1. 5–16.
-
Tummers 2016 Tummers, Lidewij: The Re-emergence of Selfmanaged Co-housing in Europe: A Critical Review of Co-housing Research. Urban Studies 53 (2016) 10. 2023–2040.
-
Tummers 2017 Tummers, Lidewij: Learning from Co-housing Initiatives–Between Passivhaus Engineers and Active Inhabitants .TU Delft, Delft 2017. 66–70, 204–244.
-
UK Cohousing Network UK Cohousing Network Website – About Cohousing .Available at: https://cohousing.org.uk/about/about- cohousing (Accessed 20 March 2020).
-
Vestbro 1998 Vestbro, Urban Dick: The Study of Collective Housing: A Swedish Perspective. In: The Meaning and Use of Housing: International Perspectives, Approaches and Their Applications . Ed.: Arias, Ernesto G. Taylor and Francis Ltd, Avebury 1998. 405–424.
-
Vestbro 2000 Vestbro, Urban Dick: From Collective Housing to Cohousing – A Summary of Research. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17 (2000) 2. 164–178.
-
Vestbro 2010 Vestbro, Urban Dick: Concepts and Terminology. In: Living Together – Cohousing Ideas and Realities around the World. Proceedings from the International Collaborative Housing Conference in Stockholm. Ed.: Vestbro, Urban Dick. Div of Urban and Regional Studies, 2010. 21–29.
-
Williams 2005a Williams, J: Designing Neighboorhoods for Social Interaction: The Case of Cohousing. Journal of Urban Design 10 (2005) 2. 195–227.
-
Williams 2005b Williams, J: Sun, Surf and Sustainable Housing – Cohousing, the Californian Experience. International Planning Studies 10 (2005) 2. 145–177.
Department of History of Architecture and of Monuments
Name of the Institute: Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Address: Műegyetem rkp. 3, K II. 82, 1111 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 463 1330
Indexing and Abstracting Services:
- SCOPUS
| 2023 | |
|---|---|
| Scopus | |
| CiteScore | 0.2 |
| CiteScore rank | Q3 (Visual Arts and Performing Arts) |
| SNIP | 0.458 |
| Scimago | |
| SJR index | 0.16 |
| SJR Q rank | Q2 |
| Építés - Építészettudomány | |
|---|---|
| Publication Model | Hybrid |
| Submission Fee | none |
| Article Processing Charge | 900 EUR/article (only for OA publications) |
| Printed Color Illustrations | 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece |
| Regional discounts on country of the funding agency | World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50% World Bank Low-income economies: 100% |
| Further Discounts | Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50% Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100% |
| Subscription fee 2025 | Online subsscription: 164 EUR / 180 USD Print + online subscription: 184 EUR / 220 USD |
| Subscription Information | Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content. |
| Purchase per Title | Individual articles are sold on the displayed price. |
| Építés - Építészettudomány | |
|---|---|
| Language | English Hungarian |
| Size | B5 |
| Year of Foundation |
1957 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
4 |
| Founder | Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  |
| Founder's Address |
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9. |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 0013-9661 (Print) |
| ISSN | 1588-2764 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2024 | 0 | 46 | 23 |
| Sep 2024 | 0 | 76 | 28 |
| Oct 2024 | 0 | 71 | 41 |
| Nov 2024 | 0 | 55 | 44 |
| Dec 2024 | 0 | 67 | 49 |
| Jan 2025 | 0 | 39 | 20 |
| Feb 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Author:
Author:
Author:
Magyarország templomépítészete 1945–1964 között
Vázlat az alkotóművészi értékeléssel megállapítható építészeti folytonosságról
Author:
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory