Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the self-assembly process for m-8-m gemini surfactants, for m = 8 and 12, in water, using the microcalorimetric titration method within the temperature range of 283.15–343.15 K. The enthalpy of micellization (ΔHmic) and critical micelle concentration (c.m.c.) have been calculated by using modified sigmoidal Boltzmann equation. Other thermodynamic parameters ΔGmic, ΔSmic, and ΔCp,mic, associated with micellization process were determined on the basis of the calorimetric results by applying the pseudo-phase separation model. The c.m.c. and ΔHmic values strongly depend on the temperature and the alkyl chain length. The enthalpy of micellization decreases and then changes its sign and becomes negative when temperature increases. The temperature dependence of the c.m.c. for the surfactants investigated exhibits typical U-shape. The results obtained are compared with literature data for other gemini cationic surfactants with a different alkyl chain length. The differences are analyzed in terms of differences in the hydrophobic interactions between the hydrocarbon chains.
Introduction
As the name implies, gemini surfactants of general formula m-s-m, consist of two surfactant moieties with alkyl chain-m covalently connected by a spacer unit s. The chain length governs many of the properties of these surfactants and similarly as temperature does, the chain length determines the association process in aqueous solutions of gemini surfactants. The temperature dependence of the properties of surfactant solutions is relevant to their applications in many fields of science and industry [1–6] while thermodynamic information is indispensable to understand the phenomenon of self-organization of surfactants into micelles. A powerful and useful technique for obtaining thermodynamic parameters of association is the isothermal titration microcalorimetry (ITC). It has been successfully applied in a growing number of studies of surfactant systems [7–19]. The major advantage of ITC for micellization studies is the ability to perform direct determination of the heat of demicellization and the c.m.c. in a single isothermal titration experiment and to carry out the experiment within a wide range of temperature. In this study we examined the thermodynamics of micellization process of aqueous solutions of alkylene-α,ω-bis(dimethylalkylammonium bromides) with the general formula: m-8-m for m = 8, 12 within the temperature range of 283.15–343.15 K using the ITC. We used this method to determine the enthalpy of micelle formation (ΔHmic) and the critical micelle concentration (c.m.c.) within the temperature range investigated. In order to describe the plots of the enthalpy of dilution versus surfactant concentration we adopted the sigmoidal Boltzmann equation (SBE) but with some modifications. The aqueous solutions of 8-8-8 gemini surfactant were earlier investigated by means of densimetric and DSC III methods [20], but no information on the temperature dependence of the enthalpy of micellization for the mentioned system is available. There are also some literature data on the micellization process of 8-12-8 in aqueous solutions obtained by means of conductometric [21], dilatometric [22], and calorimetric methods [11, 23] but they concern only few temperatures. We expected that our results together with appropriate literature data concerning other gemini surfactants would make it possible to analyze the effect of the alkyl chain length as well as that of temperature change on the value of enthalpy of micellization and on the c.m.c value of the systems under question.
Experimental section
Materials
Octylene-1,8-bis(dimethyloctylammonium bromide) was synthesized as it was described in our earlier paper [20].
Octylene-1,8-bis(dimethyldodecylammonium bromide), (surfactant 12-8-12) was carried out according to procedure given by Zana [21] for the preparation of surfactants but methanol was used as solvent. The obtained crude product was purified by crystallization from ethyl acetate/propan-2-ol (95/5) mixture (m.p. 202–204 °C, yield 58%).
1H NMR (600 MHz, D2O) 3.45–3.34 (8H, m, N-dod-1-CH2 and N-oct-1,8-CH2), 3.19 (12H, s, N-CH3), 1.84–1.73 (8H, br s, N-dod-2-CH2 and N-oct-2,7-CH2), 1.50–1.28 (44H, m, N-dod-3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11-CH2 and N-oct-3,4,5,6-CH2), 0.93 (6H, t J = 7,2 Hz, N-dod-12-CH3).
13C NMR (150 MHz, D2O) 65.41, 65.20, 54.42, 34.63, 32.53, 32.48, 32.43, 32.18, 32.14, 31.76, 30, 79, 28.71, 28.18, 55.29, 24.71, 16.53.
Before measurements, the synthesized surfactants were dried under vacuum at a temperature of 323.15 K. All solutions were made up using freshly boiled double distilled water. Solution concentrations were expressed by molarity (mol dm−3).
Method
The experiments were carried out within the temperature range of 283.15–343.15 K using isothermal titration calorimeter (Microcal). Aliquots of the concentrated surfactant solution (from 1 to 12 μl, depending on the surfactant and the temperature) were added to 1.4 ml of water in the sample cell under constant stirring 307 revolutions per minute. The concentration of the surfactant in the syringe was 1.3 mol dm−3 for 8-8-8 and 0.018 mol dm−3 for 12-8-12 (∼20 times larger than the c.m.c.). The rough c.m.c. values were determined by the trial and errors method.
Results and discussion
The typical experimental titration curves obtained for the dilution of micellar 8-8-8 and 12-8-12 solutions into water are given in Figs. 1a and 2a.
The enthalpies of dilution, ΔHdil for aqueous solutions of the surfactants investigated, are plotted against the surfactant concentration at each the temperatures under investigation in Figs. 1b and 2b. In the case of 8-8-8 surfactant only every fifth point is presented in the plot.
Because of many fitting parameters, it was impossible to determine all these parameters during a single optimalization. For this reason we separately fitted the data for pre- and post-micellar region to Eqs. 5 and 6, respectively. As low a polynomial degree as possible was used. The parameters obtained in this way were applied to Eq. 1 and they were not changed during subsequent fitting.
The dilution enthalpy curve for ionic surfactants loses its sigmoidal shape. The determination of the c.m.c. for ionic surfactants within the temperature range where ΔHmic is close to zero is often impossible, even by using modified SBE, as no jump in the enthalpy versus concentration curve is observed (Figs. 3, 4). According to Bijma et al. [14] this type of curve is a consequence of both micelle degradation during injection process and the non-ideal thermodynamic properties of the solution. For this shape of curve the determination of c.m.c. from the titration calorimetric plots becomes quite difficult. Therefore, the value of critical micelle concentration for this specific temperature range was obtained through the interpolation of data concerning other temperatures. To this aim the temperature dependences of the c.m.c. for both surfactants were fitted by the second degree polynomial [8, 9]. The values of c.m.c. determined are presented as a function of temperature in Figs. 6 and 7 and they are collected in Table 1 together with appropriate literature data.
C.m.c., enthalpy, and specific heat of the micellization of the surfactants investigated
Compound | T/K | c.m.c./mol/dm3 | ΔHmic/kJ/mol | ΔGmic/kJ/mol | TΔSmic/kJ/mol | ΔCp,mic/kJ/mol/K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8-8-8 | 283.15 | 0.0922 | 5.66 | −12.26 | 17.91 | −0.178 |
288.15 | 0.0823 | 5.80 | −12.91 | 18.71 | −0.181 | |
293.15 | 0.0769 | 4.52 | −13.30 | 17.82 | −0.183 | |
298.15 | 0.0709 | 3.67 | −13.73 | 17.40 | −0.185 | |
303.15 | 0.0671 | 3.29 | −14.18 | 17.46 | −0.188 | |
308.15 | 0.0638 | 2.29 | −14.46 | 16.76 | −0.190 | |
313.15 | 0.0635 | 1.39 | −14.75 | 16.14 | −0.193 | |
318.15 | 0.0697a | −0.13a | −14.69 | 14.57 | −0.195 | |
323.15 | 0.0895 | −1.77 | −14.26 | 12.49 | −0.198 | |
328.15 | 0.1134 | −2.81 | −13.84 | 11.02 | −0.200 | |
333.15 | 0.1219 | −4.00 | −13.85 | 9.86 | −0.202 | |
338.15 | 0.1300 | −4.09 | −13.88 | 9.78 | −0.205 | |
343.15 | 0.1341 | −4.05 | −13.77 | 9.73 | −0.207 | |
12-8-12 | 283.15 | 0.000664 | 14.80 | −24.03 | 38.83 | −1.78 |
288.15 | 0.000647 | 8.19 | −24.52 | 32.71 | −1.65 | |
293.15 | 0.000727a | −0.81a | −24.97 | 24.15 | −1.52 | |
298.15 | 0.000703; 0.00083b; 0.000682 | −9,32; −9.0b; −4.8b | −25.16 | 15.84 | −1.39 | |
303.15 | 0.000682 | −14.40; | −25.66 | 11.27 | −1.26 | |
308.15 | 0.000695 | −19.29; −17.3b;; −13.87b | −26.04 | 6.74 | −1.13 | |
313.15 | 0.000714 | −24.87 | −26.39 | 1.52 | −1.00 | |
318.15 | 0.000741 | −33.13 | −26.71 | −6.41 | −0.87 | |
323.15 | 0.000808 | −33.46 | −26.90 | −6.56 | −0.74 | |
328.15 | 0.000882 | −36.70 | −27.08 | −9.62 | −0.61 | |
333.15 | 0.000953 | −44.65 | −27.30 | −17.37 | −0.48 | |
338.15 | 0.001035 | −43.55 | −27.45 | −16.09 | −0.35 | |
343.15 | 0.001165 | −42.45 | −27.52 | −14.92 | −0.22 |
Value calculated as indicate in the text
Literature data Ref. [23]
As it is seen from Figs. 5 and 6 the c.m.c. versus temperature functions for both surfactants investigated exhibit characteristic U-shaped plot. In general, such behavior is frequently observed for the aqueous solutions of ionic surfactants [8, 9, 12]. It is a resultant of two opposing effects which influence the micellization process. The first effect is connected with the hydration of polar group of surfactant molecule and plays a key role in low range of temperature where hydrogen bond formation is more probably and the strong hydration of polar head disfavors the micelle formation process. The increase in temperature causes that the hydration of polar group decreases and thus the micellization can occurs at lower concentrations. The second effect is connected with the hydrophobic hydration of the alkyl chain, which changes the structure of water surrounding the hydrophobic tail. As is well known, the structure of water strongly depends on temperature. Because of that, the structure of water surrounding hydrophobic chains becomes looser and the hydrophobic interaction effect is weaker when the temperature increases. This phenomenon shifts the micellization process toward the higher concentration range. The competition between these two effects is the reason of the observed characteristic shape of the curve under question [12, 23].
The minimum temperatures of the c.m.c. Tmin, were determined from the same c.m.c. as a function of temperature curves. The Tmin values obtained for 8-8-8 and 12-8-12 are 304.92 and 294.81 K, respectively. This fact confirms that Tmin systematically decreases as the hydrophobic alkyl chain length m increases in homologous series of surfactants with the same counter ions. This relation can be easily explained taking into consideration the previously discussed effects. In the case of surfactants with longer hydrophobic chains (12-8-12) the contribution of the hydrophobic hydration of alkyl group is more significant than for surfactants with shorter hydrophobic chain. Accordingly, the micellization process is hindered after crossing 295 K for 12-8-12 surfactant whereas for 8-8-8 micellization starts to be disfavored only for temperature higher than 305 K. In order to analyze the effect of hydrophobic chain length on critical micelle concentration, the c.m.c values for surfactants m-8-m, obtained by different methods, were set up in Table 2. The data presented confirms that the chain length—m, strongly influences the critical micelle concentration. An increase in the hydrocarbon chain length leads to stronger hydrophobic interactions between the hydrocarbon chains, hence the micelles can be formed easier and the c.m.c. value decreases. Moreover, the increase in m chain length causes that the micelles created are bigger and less dissociated [24]. A similar result was experimentally confirmed for other monomeric surfactants [25].
The c.m.c. values of the m-8-m gemini surfactants at 298.15 K
Surfactant | c.m.c. × 10−3/mol/dm3 |
---|---|
8-8-8 | 71.0a, 75.0b |
10-8-10 | 5.8c |
12-8-12 | 0.703a 0.80c 0.83d |
14-8-14 | 0.018d |
16-8-16 | 0.038d |
18-8-18 | 0.0115d |
The experimental results of the ΔHmic for 8-8-8 and 12-8-12 surfactants obtained from modified Sigmoidal–Boltzmann equation for the temperature range investigated were listed with some literature data in Table 2 and shown as a function of temperature in Figs. 7 and 8, respectively. The enthalpies of micellization for the temperature range where no jump in the enthalpy versus concentration curve was observed were calculated similarly as in the case of the c.m.c. Non linear regression yields a transition temperature where ΔHmic = 0 for 8-8-8 and 12-8-12. Consequently, the c.m.c has a shallow minimum near this temperature (Figs. 5, 6). As it can be seen from the presented data at low temperatures, the micellization enthalpy at temperatures below 313.15 K for 8-8-8 and below 288.15 for 12-8-12 is endothermic and then becomes exothermic as the temperature raises (Figs. 7, 8). As is well know, the enthalpy of micellization illustrates of energetic effect of the micelle formation process. It is a sum of several contributions which are connected with the structure of amphiphilic molecule [12, 23, 26]. The main contribution to this value comes from the transfer of the surfactant alkyl chains from aqueous solution to the micelle core while the water molecule surrounding hydrophobic chain are released to the bulk aqueous phase. This effect can be either exothermic or endothermic depending on temperature. At low temperatures, the destruction of structured water surrounding alkyl chains dominates over the condensation of alkyl chains into a micelle and in consequence the is endothermic, and reversely at higher temperatures the is exothermic. The second contributing effect, , describes the repulsion among the same charged heads of surfactant molecules and among the counter ions as well as attracting interactions between opposite charged ions and ionic groups. According to the opinion of Grosmaire et al. [23], the has negative contribution because of superior repulsive interaction.
The contributions connected with changes in the conformation of alkyl chain which take place during their transfer to the micelle core or with steric interaction between hydrophilic groups are unknown, but their magnitude is not meaningful [23]. Other effects that involve spacer chain length were not taken into account, because we compared compounds with the same spacer chain.
At low temperatures, the micellization enthalpy for 8-8-8 and 12-8-12 is endothermic and then becomes exothermic as the temperature raises (Figs. 7, 8). This behavior is determined by sign changes in the major contribution of the enthalpy of micellization— Increasing temperature causes that the structure of water breaks down. As a result the positive effect related to destruction of structured water surrounding alkyl chains is dominated by the negative effect connected with the condensation of hydrophobic chains inside the micelle and the becomes more exothermic upon increasing temperature [12, 23]. The effect of temperature on the enthalpy of micellization appears to be less visible at higher range of temperatures—333.15–343.15 K, as shown in Figs. 7 and 8. The above discussion leads to the conclusion that at 333.15 K the structured of water is so disturbed that any changes in temperatures do not significantly .
The isobaric heat capacity of micellization was found to be negative for both the surfactants investigated through the whole temperature range, as for most processes involving hydrophobic aggregation effects [8, 9] (Table 1).
Summary
This study proved that the isothermal titration microcalorimetry can be used as a sensitive research tool for the examination of the bulk behavior of gemini surfactants by determining the c.m.c. and enthalpy of micellization within a wide range of temperature. The modified Sigmoidal–Boltzmann equation, which was presented in the study, can be fruitfully employed for describing the titration curves and determining the thermodynamic parameters of micellization of surfactants. The thermodynamics parameters of the self-assembly process are indispensable for the determination of the factors that contribute to the aggregation process in solution: water structure, van der Waals interaction, hydrophobic hydration, etc. In the case of m-8-m surfactants, lengthening the alkyl chain results in a decrease in the c.m.c. values, which is consistent with the enhanced hydrophobic character of the surfactant molecule. The critical micelle concentration of 8-8-8 and 12-8-12 surfactants passes through a minimum with increasing temperature. This behavior is the outcome of two opposite contributions, one coming from the hydration of the hydrophobic chains and the other due to a partial hydration of the head group in the surfactant. The values of ΔHmic obtained for the surfactants investigated indicate that the thermal effect of micellization is also dependent on the water structure and interaction between hydrophobic chains. The Gibbs free energy change was found to be negative, implying as expected that micellization occurs spontaneously. Further it was found that the changes in enthalpy and entropy almost compensate each other for surfactant with shorter chain lengths (8-8-8). In the case of 12-8-12 the entropy is the main factor responsible for micellization only at temperatures near 298 K, because at higher temperature the unique structure of water is broken down and, consequently, hydrophobic interactions becomes weaker. The experiments confirm that the micelle formation can be seen as a compromise of a variety of attractive and repulsive forces.
References
1. Maithufi, MN, Joubert, DJ, Kulmperman, B 2011 Application of gemini surfactants as a diesel fuel wax dispersants. Energy Fuels 25:162–171 .
2. Laatiris, A, Achouri, ME, Infante, MR, Bensouda, Y 2008 Antibacterial activity, structure and CMC relationships of alkanediyl α,ω-bis(dimethylammonium bromide) surfactants. Microbiol Res 163:645–650 .
3. Cardoso, A, Faneca, H, Almedia, JA, Pais, AA, Marques, EF MC de Lima Jurado, AS 2011 Gemini surfactant dimethylene-1,2-bis(tetradecyldimethylammonium bromide)-based gene vectors: a biophysical approach to transfection efficiency. Biochim Biophys Acta 1808:341–351 .
4. Wetting, SD, Verrall, RE, Foldvari, M 2008 Gemini surfactants: a new family of building blocks for non-viral gene delivery systems. Curr Gene Ther 8:9–23 .
5. Zana, R, Xia, J 2004 Gemini surfactants Marcel Dekker New York.
6. Jones, M, Leroux, J 1999 Polymeric micelles—a new generation of colloidal drug carriers. Eur J Pharm Sci 48:101–111.
7. Hait, SK, Moulik, SP, Palepu, R 2002 Refined method of assessment of parameters of micellization of surfactants and percolation of W/O microemulsions. Langmuir 18:2471–2476 .
8. Paula, S, Süs, W, Jürgen, T, Blume, A 1995 Thermodynamics of micelle formation as a function of temperature: a high sensitivity titration calorimetry study. J Phys Chem 99:11742–11751 .
9. Kirláy, Z, Dekány, I 2001 Thermometric titration study on the micelle formation of sodium decyl sulfate in water. J Colloid Interf Sci 242:214–219 .
10. Bouchemal, K, Agnely, F, Koffi, A, Ponchel, G 2009 A concise analysis of the effect of temperature and propanediol-1,2 on pluronic F127 micellization using isothermal titration microcalorimetry. J Colloid Interf Sci 338:169–176 .
11. Grosmaire, L, Chorro, M, Chorro, C, Partyka, S, Lagerge, S 2001 Micellar structure of gemini cationic surfactants: influence of the spacer length. Termochimica Acta 379:255–260 .
12. Shimzu, S, Augusto, RP, Seoud, OA 2004 Thermodynamics of micellization of benzyl(2-acylaminoethyl)dimethylammonium chloride surfactants in aqueous solutions: a conductivity and titration calorimetry study. Langmuir 20:9551–9559 .
13. Bouchemal, K, Agnely, F, Koffi, A, Djabourov, M, Ponchel, G 2010 What can isothermal titration microcalorimetry experiments tell us about the self-organization of surfactants into micelles?. J Mol Recognit 23:335–342 .
14. Bijma, K, Engberts, JBFN, Blandamer, MJ, Cullis, PM, Last, MP, Irlam, KD, Soldi, LG 1997 Classification of calorimetric titration plots for alkyltrimethylammonium and alkylpyridinium cationic surfactant in aqueous solutions. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 93 8 1579–1584 .
15. Wang, Y, Han, Y, Huang, X, Cao, M, Wang, Y 2008 Aggregation behaviors of a series of anionic sulfonate gemini surfactants and their corresponding monomeric surfactant. J Colloid Interf Sci 319:534–541 .
16. Li, Y, Li, P, Wang, J, Wang, Y, Yan, H, Dong, C, Thomas, RK 2005 Thermodynamics of micellization for partially fluorinated cationic gemini surfactants and related single-chain surfactants in aqueous solution. J Colloid Interf Sci 287:333–337 .
17. Grosmaire, L, Chorro, M, Chorro, C, Partyka, S, Zana, R 2000 Thermodynamics of micellization of cationic dimeric (gemini) surfactants. Progr Colloid Polym Sci 115:31–35 .
18. Lagerge, S, Kamyshny, A, Magdassi, S, Partyka, S 2003 Calorimetric methods applied to the investigation of divided systems in colloid science. J Therm Anal Calorim 71:291–310 .
19. Geng, F, Liu, J, Zheng, L, Yu, L, Ganzuo, L, Chenho, T 2010 Micelle formation of long-chain imidazolium ionic liquids in aqueous solution measured by isothermal titration microcalorimetry. J Chem Eng Data 55:147–151 .
20. Piekarski, H, Łudzik, K, Wasiak, M 2011 Calorimetric and densimetric examinations of aqueous solutions of heptylene-1,7-bis (dimethyloctylammonium bromide) and octylene-1,8-bis(dimethyloctylammonium bromide). J Therm Anal Calorim 104:765–770 .
21. Zana, R 2002 ω-Bis(dimethylalkylammonium bromide) surfactants. 10 Behavior in aqueous solution at concentrations below the critical micellization concentration: en electrical conductivity study. J Colloid Interf Sci 246:182–190 .
22. Wetting, SD, Verrall, RE 2001 Thermodynamic studies of aqueous m-s-m gemini surfactant systems. J Colloid Interf Sci 235:310–316 .
23. Grosmaire, L, Chorro, M, Chorro, C, Partyka, S, Zana, R 2002 Alkanediyl-α,ω-bis(dimethylalkyammonium bromie) surfactants. 9. Effect of the spacer carbon number and temperatures on the enthalpy of micellization. J Colloid Interf Sci 246:175–181 .
24. Danino, D, Talmon, Y, Zana, R 1995 Alkanediyl-α,ω-bisdimethylalkylammonium bromide) surfactants (dimeric surfactants). 5 Aggregation and microstructure in aqueous solutions. Langmuir 11:1448–1456 .
25. Cho, S, Kim, J, Chun, J, Kim, J 2005 Ultrasonic formation of nanobubbles and their zeta-potentials in aqueous electrolyte and surfactant solutions. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp 269:28–34 .
26. Chachaty, C, Berdel, T 1992 Nuclear spin relaxation and dynamical behaviour of short-chain surfactants in micellar and liquid-crystalline aggregates. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 88:1893–1900 .
27. Lah, J, Pohar, C, Vesnaver, G 2000 Calorimetric study of the micellization of alkylpyridinium and alkyltrimethylammonium bromides in water. J Phys Chem B 104:2522–2526 .
28. Lumry, R, Rajender, S 1970 Enthalpy–entropy compensation phenomena in water solutions of proteins and small molecules: a ubiquitous property of water. Biopolymers 9:1125–1227 .